The emergence and coming into being of multilingual and multicultural education under the conditionsof traditional monolingual thinking | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2010. № 338.

The emergence and coming into being of multilingual and multicultural education under the conditionsof traditional monolingual thinking

The paper is devoted to the processes of emergence, development and coming into being of bilingual and multilingual education, as well as factors influencing the effectiveness of language education. Multilingual education has a rather long history, and is not a result of the growth of linguistic and cultural self-consciousness and a need for interlingual and intercultural communication in the second half of the 20 century. Unlike most of the European countries, where with the introduction of the compulsory education, the linguistic policies, with the exception of a few multinational states, were directed at supporting monolingualism, in the USA a number of bilingual schools were opened for the children of European immigrants. The organization of bilingual schools allowed ethnic communities to preserve and maintain the cultural and linguistic heritage of the countries of their origin. After the First World War bilingual teaching was ousted from the system of national education as the result of the growth of anti-immigrant sentiments in the American society. Next, the paper presents the analysis of the reasons for the revival of the bilingual education in the USA in the 70s of the 20 century, and of the reasons for the failure of the bilingual education for language minorities on the basis of a number of legislative acts passed by the US Congress in the 60s and 70s. The American legislation on introducing bilingual education was a result of the reaction to the political movements for civil rights. The theoretical basis of bilingual education, which was based on using first the native tongue as the medium of instruction and then changing over to the second language, was provided by the theoreticians of the "supportive education in the mother tongue". Bilingual education, however, did not lead to the expected results, and in 2002 the action of the bilingual education law was discontinued. The causes for the bilingual education experiment failure are based in the rejection of early foreign language teaching, which led to artificial delay in the native language education and to depriving students of the advantages of early language teaching in achieving balanced multilingualism. Another conclusion made in the paper concerns the importance of a favourable supportive language environment in providing for the development of balanced multilingualism, which can be achieved through accumulating a rich language experience by participating in diverse language activities in an unconstrained informal setting. Next, the paper considered the experience in organizing multilingual and multicultural education in Europe. In the process of economic and political integration of Europe, multilingualism and multiculturalism were declared the leading principles. Linguists and researchers in the field of language teaching methodology were given the task of looking for ways of achieving individual multilingualism and multiculturalism in the European society. On the basis of an analysis of the organization of multilingual education in the world, the paper proposes a number of measures in developing multilingual programs aimed at balanced multilingualism, including early language teaching, creating afavour-renderable supportive language environment and using the Content and Subject Integrated Teaching and Learning, based on the use of the second language as the medium of instruction in non-language subjects

Download file
Counter downloads: 243

Keywords

CLIL, bilingual and multilingual education, Европа, США, мышление, двуязычное и многоязычное образование

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Smokotin V.M.vmsmokotin@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Общеевропейские компетенции владения иностранным языком: изучение, обучение, оценка // Департамент по языковой политике, Совет Европы. Страсбург: Совет Европы, 2004
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice, 2006.
Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004-2006. COM (2003) 449 final. Brussels, 24.07.2003.
Pugliese Ch. Languages go to top of the class, TEFL news, March 22, 2001, EducationGuardian.co.uk.
Marsh D. CLTL / EMILE - the European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresights Potential. Brussels: The European Union, 2002.
Kai-Hwa Wang F. On Raising Bilingual and Multilingual Children. Asian-American Village, IMDIVERSITY.COM, 2000.
Dowty T. Free Range Education: How Home Education Works. Stroud, U.K.: Hawthorn Press, 2000.
Multilingualism in the brain. Basel University essay. Basel: Basel University, 2002.
Lenneberg E.H. The Biological Foundations of Language. N.Y.: Wiley, 1967.
Sternberg R.J. Cognitive psychology. N.Y.: Hartcourt, Brace, 1999.
Oyama S. A sensitive period for the acquisition of nonnative phonological system // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1976. № 5. Р. 261-184.
Penfield W., Roberts L. Speech and Brain-mechanisms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959.
McLaughlin B. Myths and Misconceptions About Second Language Learning: What Every Teacher Needs To Unlearn. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, 1992.
Peter Duignan. Bilingual Education: A critique. Hoover Institution, 1996.
Mini-Digest of Educational Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics, 1995.
Cummins J. The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students // Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles, 1981.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; The Bilingual Education Act of 1968 (Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act); The Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974.
Kloss H. The American Bilingual Tradition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1977.
 The emergence and coming into being of multilingual and multicultural education under the conditionsof traditional monolingual thinking | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2010. № 338.

The emergence and coming into being of multilingual and multicultural education under the conditionsof traditional monolingual thinking | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2010. № 338.

Download file