The strategies of word semantization and the factors that determine their choice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 343.

The strategies of word semantization and the factors that determine their choice

The objective of this article was to describe the strategies of word semantizationby common native speakers and factors that determine speakers choice. Semantization of lexical meaning was carried out within a linguisticexperiment, in which 50 students of Kemerovo State University, aged from 18 to 22, took part. 60 words of the Russian languagereferring to denotative vocabulary were analysed. These words were from two thematic classes: Nature facts (wormwood, flood, crow)and Artefacts (church, table, dinner jacket). This research was aimed at proving experimentally that word semantization had variationcharacter, determined, on the one hand, by the type of lexical meaning, on the other hand, by the type of the preferred strategy of interpretation,speakers individual speech experience. The complex experimental research of denotation lexical meaning interpretationshowed the following: 1. Ordinary word semantization was a special kind of mental activity, which focused on language. The result ofthis semantization was the acquired knowledge verbalized by linguistic means. The process of word semantization by common nativespeakers was considered as some objective reality, due to which we could speak about multiple-aspect functioning of meta-language consciousness.2. During the process of lexical meaning interpretation the speaker chose a definite language strategy of word semantics perception.On the one hand, the potential strategy spectrum of word meaning perception was determined by the type of lexical meaning, on theother hand, by the type of mental action specific for every person. The research showed that some people had typical strategies of wordmeaning perception that reflected their individuality. It was also ascertained that some people chose different interpretation strategies of oneword while the others used the same ones. The choice similarity and the domination of this or that particular strategy could be explained bythe similarity of cognition, unanimity of psychical function of language sign perception for every member of this language society. But atthe same time this mental mechanism provided a speaker with the choice of strategy of word meaning perception.

Download file
Counter downloads: 340

Keywords

стратегии семантизации лексического значения слова, наивная лингвистика, рядовой носитель языка, strategies of lexical meaning semantization, naive linguistic, common native speaker

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kuznetsova Tatjana Yu.Kemerovo State Universitytanechka525@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Вепрева И.Т. О некоторых особенностях наивной лексикографии // Русский язык сегодня: проблемы русской лексикографии. М., 2004. Вып. 3. С. 55-64.
Дебренн М. Изменяющаяся Россия: новые парадигмы и новые решения в лингвистике // Новосибирский государственный университет. Сер. «Филологический сборник». Кемерово, 2006. Вып. 8, ч. 1. С. 3-4.
Кашкин В.Б. Обыденная философия, наивная лингвистика и наивная лингвистическая технология // Обыденное метаязыковое сознание: онтологические и гносеологические аспекты. Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2009. С. 41-61.
Резанова З.И. Функциональный аспект словообразования: Русское производное имя. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1996. 219 с.
Ростова А.Н. Обыденное метаязыковое сознание: статус и аспекты изучения // Обыденное метаязыковое сознание и наивная лингвистика: Межвуз. сб. науч. ст. / Отв. ред. А.Н. Ростова. Кемерово; Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2008. С. 49-57.
Блинова О.И. Носители диалекта - о своем диалекте (Об одном из источников лексикологического исследования) // Сибирские русские говоры. Томск, 1984. С. 3-15.
Брайт У. Параметры социолингвистики // Зарубежная лингвистика. М., 1999. С. 107-114.
Кашкин В.Б. Научные теории и бытовые представления о языке: история и перспективы исследования // Обыденное метаязыковое сознание и наивная лингвистика: Межвуз. сб. науч. ст. / Отв. ред. А.Н. Ростова. Кемерово; Барнаул: Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2008. С. 30-41.
Словарь русского языка / Под ред. А.П. Евгеньевой. М., 1999.
Ростова А.Н. Метатекст как форма экспликации метаязыкового сознания (на материале русских говоров Сибири). Томск: Изд-во Том. ун- та, 2000. 194 с.
Вежбицкая А. Язык. Культура. Познание. М.: Русские словари, 1996. 416 с.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Типы языковых значений: Оценка. Событие. Факт. М., 1988. 896 с.
Ростова А.Н., Кузнецова Т.Ю. Диалектика «общего» и «индивидуального» в обыденных толкованиях лексического значения // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2008. Вып. 2 (34). С. 180-182.
 The strategies of word semantization and the factors that determine their choice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 343.

The strategies of word semantization and the factors that determine their choice | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 343.

Download file