Dynamics of vegetable substance reserves and phases of post-technogenous soil formation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 346.

Dynamics of vegetable substance reserves and phases of post-technogenous soil formation

A complex of factors determined by technogenesisconditions natural forming of soil and vegetative cover in technogenic landscapes. In self-regenerating ecosystems the process of soiland vegetative community transformation is syngenetic. The initial phase of post-technogenous soil formation is diagnosed by the pioneergrouping on initial embryonic soil; the dynamic phase of soil formation - by a simple plant grouping on organic-accumulative embryonicsoil; it transforms into the complex plant grouping on caespitose embryonic soil. The metastable phase of soil formation is diagnosedby the existing grouping on humus-accumulative embryonic soil. Peculiarities of soil and biological processes can be characterizedby vegetable substance dynamics observation. Overground vegetable substance (green phytomass, dead grass, ground litter) wascalculated from cuts (1m2); to determine the amount of underground phytomass, soil monoliths were cradled and roots were singularised.Differently aged self-overgrowing coal damps of Kuzbass (southern forest-steppe) were chosen as objects of research. The initialstage is diagnosed by predominance of single ruderal types of pioneer groupings with low projective cover and initial embryonic soilswith no organic bedrocks. Young species with tap root system predominate in groupings. They are not able to reproduce themselves asecond time during one vegetative period that is why the common reserve of vegetable substance grows on overground parts of plants. Adiagnostic sign of transition from the initial stage to the dynamic stage of evolution is the accumulation of ground litter - the first organicbedrock (A0) in the cross section of embryonic soils, which is formed by grassy polycarpic plants giving much overground phytomass.This phytomass in time will transform into mortmass. Further settling of mesophilic polycarpic short- and long-root pratal,pratal-hylile species helps to bind the upper layer of soil by a complicated root system and to form distinct sod in soil cross section.(A0+AД). This species predetermine changing vegetative grouping succession to the next stage, and embryonic soils to the sodphase of soil formation. Conversion to the stage of a closed community is diagnosed by the humus-accumulative horizon in soil crosssection (A0+AД+А1). Common substance reserve is 20 times bigger than at the initial stage and from 9 to 1,4 times bigger than at thedynamic stage. A bigger part of reserves (85%) of vegetative groupings is in the underground part, the other (15%) reserves are in theoverground part. The existing groupings are predominantly formed at horizontal surfaces with relatively propitious ecological conditions.

Download file
Counter downloads: 333

Keywords

эмбриозем, растительная группировка, сингенетичность, сукцессия, запас растительного вещества, embryonic soil, plant grouping, syngenetics, succession, vegetable substance reserve

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Podurets Olga I.Kuzbass State Pedagogical Academy (Novokuznetsk)Glebova-Podurets@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Таранов С.А., Кандрашин Е.Р., Фаткулин Ф.А. и др. Парцеллярная структура фитоценоза и неоднородность молодых почв техногенных ландшафтов // Почвообразование в техногенных ландшафтах. Новосибирск: Наука, 1979. С. 19-58.
Курачев В.М., Кандрашин Е.Р., Рагим-заде Ф.К. Сингенетичность растительности и почв техногенных ландшафтов: экологические аспекты, классификация // Сибирский экологический журнал. 1994. № 3. С. 205-213.
Воронов А.Г. Геоботаника. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1973. 383 с.
Кандрашин Е.Р. Сингенез и продуктивность естественной растительности и полукультурфитоценозов на отвалах угольных разрезов Южного Кузбасса // Почвообразование в техногенных ландшафтах. Новосибирск: Наука, 1979. С. 163-172.
Андроханов В.А., Куляпина Е.Д., Курачев В.М. Почвы техногенных ландшафтов: генезис и эволюция. Новосибирск: Изд-во СО РАН, 2004. 151 с.
Гаджиев И.М., Курачев В.М., Андроханов В.А. Стратегия и перспективы решения проблем рекультивации нарушенных земель. Новосибирск: ЦЭРИС, 2001. 37 с.
Глебова О.И. Биогеографическая диагностика эмбриоземов Кузбасса: Автореф. дис. ... канд. биол. наук. Новосибирск, 2005. 18 с.
Родин Л.Е., Базилевич Н.И. Динамика органического вещества и биологический круговорот в основных типах растительности. М.; Л.: Наука, 1965. 253 с.
Титлянова А.А., Афанасьев Н.А., Наумова Н.Б. Сукцессии и биологический круговорот. Новосибирск: Наука, 1993. 157 с.
Титлянова А.А., Косых Н.П., Миронычева-Токарева Н.П., Романова И.П. Подземные органы растений в травяных экосистемах. Новосибирск: Наука, 1996. 128 с.
Корчагин А.А. Видовой (флористический) состав растительных сообществ и методы его изучения // Полевая геоботаника. М.; Л.: Наука, 1964. Т. 3. С. 39-62.
Махонина Г.И. Экологические аспекты почвообразования в техногенных экосистемах Урала. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Уральского ун-та, 2003. 356 с.
Миронычева-Токарева Н.П. Динамика растительности при зарастании отвалов (на примере КАТЭКа). Новосибирск: Наука, 1998. 172 с.
 Dynamics of vegetable substance reserves and phases of post-technogenous soil formation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 346.

Dynamics of vegetable substance reserves and phases of post-technogenous soil formation | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2011. № 346.

Download file