Corporate social policy: methods of research | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 355.

Corporate social policy: methods of research

There is an increasing socialimpact on economy in the course of the social system development. It leads to the qualitative change of relations in the society and is expressedin the form of changing the economized principle by a socialized principle, which in its turn arises from the interests of societydevelopment as a whole and of a single person but not from the full satisfaction of individual needs. From this we form the understanding ofa new role of the worker and the new perception of labour economics (as a science concerning the worker as a creative individual) and alsothe realization of the necessity to add the knowledge of social communication and cooperation between individuals to the labour economy.The international practice shows that if the companys sustainable development is based both on economic and social factors then it leads toa decrease in business risks, strengthens competitiveness, raises the personnel efficiency and the consumers loyalty, improves the reputationof the company and makes a positive contribution of the company to the economic and social development of the territory where the companyis located. It means that national priorities of society development and the problem of effective businesses are strategically compatibleand directly connected with each other. However, Russian companies are in the process of comprehension of the necessity to formulate,implement and develop the corporate social policy. There is a detailed literature review on the research problems. This review includes thepapers of foreign and Russian scientists. The main ways of discussion were determined. A new strategy of corporate social responsibilitywas highlighted adopted by the European Commission. The following types of reports are accepted: the Corporate Social ResponsibilityReport, the Sustainable Development Report and the Social Development Report. The Russian experience was examined according to thesestandards. The article includes the definition of the corporate social policy including the following main elements: companys legal responsibilities,conditions of the collective bargaining contract, voluntary social services for employees. We suppose that it is necessary to estimatethe efficiency of the implemented corporate social policy in order to control the correlation between social investments and companycapitalization, to forecast the impact of social policy on the employees, company reputation. To achieve these purposes we suggest to usethe index of social development, which includes three levels of corporate social policy estimation.

Download file
Counter downloads: 17

Keywords

efficiency of corporate social policy, social responsibility of business, corporate social policy, social investment, social programs, social aspect of modernization, эффективность социальной политики, социальные программы предприятий, социальные инвестиции, корпоративная социальная политика, социальные аспекты модернизации, социальная ответственность бизнеса

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Nekhoda Yevgenia V.National Research Tomsk State Universitysheyna@sibmail.com
Rakovskaya Vera S.National Research Tomsk Polytechnic Universityvera.rakovskaya@gmail.com
Minigulova Guzial S.BelovoBranch of Kemerovo State UniversityMinigulova_GS@mail.ru
Всего: 3

References

Бурджалов Ф. Социальная сфера предприятия: корпоративный вариант // Труд за рубежом. 2004. № 1. С. 95-112.
Усатый Н. Предприятие как субъект социальной политики // Человек и труд. 2008. № 6. С. 37-38.
Гонтмахер Е. Российская модернизация: институциональные ловушки и цивилизационные ориентиры // Международная экономика и международные отношения. 2010. № 10. С. 3-11.
Прокопов Ф., Феоктистова Е. и др. Базовые показатели результативности. Рекомендации по использованию в практике управления и корпоративной нефинансовой отчетности / под общ. ред. А. Шохина. М. : РСПП, 2008. 68 с.
Соболева И. Социальная ответственность бизнеса: глобальный контекст и российские реалии // Вопросы экономики. 2005. № 10. С. 90-102.
ЕС: поддержка принципов корпоративной социальной ответственности // Человек и труд. 2003. № 2. С. 42-45.
Костин А. Корпоративная социальная ответственность: мировой опыт и концепция для России // Стратегии России. 2004. № 2. С. 63-69.
Приходько В., Иванова Т. О смене управленческих парадигм // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2004. № 6. С. 96-100.
Балацкий Е. Кризис социальных наук в свете развития рынков // Общество и экономика. 2010. № 5. С. 14-35.
Karjaliainen Т. Institutional Framing of Environmental Issues // I. Massa, V.-P. Tynkynen, eds. The Struggle for Russian Environmental Policy. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications, 2001. P. 34-56.
Сейранян Т. Дж. Стиглиц: нездоровый интерес к динамике ВВП привел к кризису. URL: http://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/news/2009/09/23/ 844148 (дата обращения 15.09.2011 г.).
Теория фирмы. СПб. : Экономическая школа, 2006. 534 с.
Сорнина Г.Н. Экономическая мысль XX столетия: страницы истории. М. : РОССПЭН, 2000. 223 с.
Иноземцев В.Л. Цели и структура корпорации как основа ее конкурентоспособности // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2001. № 3. С. 63-68.
Петросян Д., Фаткина Н. Экономический эгоизм и гуманизация экономики // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 8. С. 123-131.
Яницкий О.Н. Социальные ограничения модернизации России // Социологические исследования. 2010. № 7. С. 17-27.
 Corporate social policy: methods of research | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 355.

Corporate social policy: methods of research | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 355.

Download file