The relationships of a man and a text in the prognostic aspect | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 357.

The relationships of a man and a text in the prognostic aspect

In the following article the text is described in the communicative space as the bearer of the category ofpredictability. The category of predictability of the text comes from the recognition of its communicative character. The process of textgeneration has a kind of the "macro signified" part, that is defined by the original idea of the text as a meaningful unit, later divided intothe "micro signified". The studied category of predictability is described in two parameters: the parameter that actualises semiotic plansof the text (semantic, pragmatic and syntactic), and the parameter that actualises the levels of determination (lexical, textual,"undertextual"). According to the systemocentrism, the predictability of the text is made up of the text itself, because it consists of theunits within the limits of the system. Forecasting and monitoring mechanisms of text creation are caused by the word-factor and the textfactor. If the word is regarded as a coagulated text (textual aspect of the word), it serves as both the determinant and the deterministic.Each word has semantics, pragmatics, and internal syntactics. The factor of conditionality of the text is an important step of textderivation and is under construction on the basis of cause and effect attitudes of initial units of the speech matter. The plan of the textrepresents the macromeant and by that defines units and ways of derivation. The communicative space is understood as the environmentof life of the text, representing a complicatedly organized, internally controversial system. Research of the text in the communicativespace assumes orientation of the text on perceiving. It is a question of language space, formed during text formation and text perception.In this paradigm the text appears as a display of properties of text prognostics, i.e. as an anticipation of the future phenomena. In thestructure of language capacity the derivational component shows the complex capacity of speaking and listening to perception,understanding, transformation, forecasting and control of text activity. In the system of language there exists a synergetic potential oflanguage units and the general determinism of text space based on intratext properties. Eventually, the author says that the prediction ofthe text, being an internal seme of text generation and developed in three complementary ways (pragmatics, semantics, syntactics), hasdifferent kinds of intensity, so the derivation-association experiment that reflects and systematizes its materials, gives a possibility tostudy the prediction of the text. Prognostic examination of linguistic phenomena makes it possible to draw the following conclusions: aword / a syntagma can not be identified out of the context, the perception takes place in the paradigmatic way; the context alwaysdefines and specifies the meaning of the word; in the language / speech ambivalent contexts are an exception, since the language savingsand redundancy, dialectically combined, remove ambiguity statements by the contextual environment, usual normalization of speechand the situation of speaking.

Download file
Counter downloads: 19

Keywords

predictability, signified and signifier of text, text generation, прогнозируемость, означаемое и означающее текста, текстопорождение

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Lopatina Irina A.Altai State Institute of Teacher Training (Barnaul)Lopatinai@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Лопатина (Крылова) И.А. Прогностика текста как универсальная функционально-семантическая категория // Русский язык как средство реализации диалога культур : сб. статей участников 2-й Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. (16-18 марта 2005 г., Хабаровск) : Изд-во Хабар. гос. техн. ун-та, 2005. С. 114-123.
Лопатина (Крылова) И.А. Текстовая прогностика: теоретическая постановка проблемы // Филология: ХХI век (теория и методика преподавания) : Материалы Всерос. конф., посвящ. 70-летию БГПУ (10-11 дек., 2003 г.) / под ред. Н.Б. Лебедевой, Е.А. Косых. Барнаул : Изд-во БГПУ, 2004. С. 49-51.
Гальперин И.Р. К проблеме зависимости предложения от контекста // Вопросы языкознания. 1968. № 1. С. 54-58.
Голев Н.Д., Лопатина (Крылова) И.А. Прогностика слова в тексте / Н.Д. Голев, И.А. Лопатина // Проблемы лингвистической прогностики: сб. науч. тр. / под ред. А.А. Кретова. Вып. 3. Воронеж : ЦЧКИ, 2004. С. 51-55.
Кретов А.А. Контуры лингвистической прогностики // Проблемы лингвистической прогностики : сб. науч. тр. / под ред. А.А. Кретова. Воронеж : ЦЧКИ, 2000. Вып. 1. С. 3-9.
Лаптева О.Н. Речевые возможности текстовой омонимии. 2-е изд., стереотип. М. : Едиториал УРСС, 2003. 416 с.
Голев Н.Д. Динамический аспект лексической мотивации. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1989. 252 с.
Основы теории текста : учеб. пособие / под ред. A.A. Чувакина. Барнаул : Изд-во АГУ, 2003. 179 с.
Садовский В.Н. Смена парадигм системного мышления // Системные исследования. Методологические проблемы : Ежегодник - 1992-1994. М., 1996. С. 64-79.
 The relationships of a man and a text in the prognostic aspect | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 357.

The relationships of a man and a text in the prognostic aspect | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 357.

Download file