«Counter-text» as evaluative thinking form in information understanding process (based on the Bible text) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

«Counter-text» as evaluative thinking form in information understanding process (based on the Bible text)

The article analyses the linguistic andpsycholinguistic studies of such a specific property of the human mind as its ability to assess. The object of the experimental research isthe process of understanding different types of texts from the perspective of psycholinguistics. The purpose of the study, as reflected inthis article, is the psycholinguistic features of perception and understanding of the Bible, which did not receive adequate attention frommodern scholars of the text, its typology and understanding. The novelty of our study is to identify and analyse the phenomenon ofevaluative thinking, manifested in the process of understanding and interpreting the texts of the Bible as a special type of speechproducts from the point of view of "psycholinguistics of text." The urgency is due to the opportunities that the biblical text gives us inrelation to its features, the possession of great emotional stress, and the affecting potential. All this provides an opportunity to studymanifestations of different forms of evaluation thinking of the recipients, as well as the mechanisms of influence of information on theminds in the form of this type of texts. In the study, we rely on A.I. Novikov's hypothesis about the active role of the recipient,according to which understanding is thought to be a process that reflects the productive analytical and synthetic activity of humanconsciousness, during which the construction of the so-called "counter-text" is done. In analysing the data obtained in the course of ourexperiment, we first used the A.I. Novikov's technique of "counter-text" on the Bible. The study of evaluative category also requires anintegrative approach, including methods of linguistic analysis of the semantics of linguistic units, as well as methods ofpsycholinguistics. As a result of the pilot study the following conclusions were made. Evaluation is not simply one of the most importantcomponents in the structure of reflective consciousness, but it is its fundamental category. A great role is played by emotionalassessment. Comparison (on four types of text) of the data supports the hypothesis that the evaluative thinking is most clearlymanifested in the perception and understanding of this type of text, the Bible. Particularly this type of texts helps to identify features oflanguage consciousness of the individual, since it provides the necessary emotional stimulus for recipients to express their subjectiveattitude to the reality in the form of evaluation, mainly emotional.

Download file
Counter downloads: 369

Keywords

оценка, тип текста, понимание / восприятие текста, психолингвистика текста, evaluation, text type, understanding / perception of text, psycholinguistics of text

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Davletova Yaroslava A.Bashkir State University (Ufa)slavaza@bk.ru
Всего: 1

References

Бахтин М.М. Литературно-критические статьи. М., 1986.
Бахтин М.М. Проблема речевых жанров. М., 1979.
Никитин М.В. Основания когнитивной семантики. СПб. : Изд-во РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2003. 277 с.
Телия В.Н. Экспрессивность как проявление субъективного фактора в языке и ее прагматическая организация. М. : Наука, 1991.
Колесов Д.В. Оценка (психология и прагматика оценки). М. : Изд-во Моск. психолого-социального ин-та, 2006.
Колшанский Г.В. Соотношение субъективных и объективных факторов в языке. М. : Наука, 1975.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Язык и мир человека. М. : Языки русской культуры, 1999. 896 с.
Вольф Е.М. Метафора в языке и тексте. М. : Наука, 1988. С. 52-65.
Гибатова Г.Ф. Ментальные сферы русского языка: мнение и оценка: дис. … д-ра филол. наук. Уфа, 2011.
Жинкин Н.И. Речь как проводник информации. М. : Наука, 1982. 158 с.
Новиков А.И. Текст и его смысловые доминанты / под ред. Н.В. Васильевой, Н.М. Нестеровой, Н.П. Пешковой. М. : Ин-т языкознания РАН, 2007. С. 203-207.
Залевская А.А. Введение в психолингвистику. М. : Российский гос. гуманит. ун-т, 1999. 382 с.
Леонтьев А.А. Основы психолингвистики. М. : Смысл, 2005. 288 с.
Белянин В.П. Основы психолингвистической диагностики: модели мира в литературе. М., 2000.
Пешкова Н.П. Текст и его понимание: теоретико-экспериментальное исследование в русле интегративного подхода / Н.П. Пешкова, А.А. Авакян, И.В. Кирсанова, И.Н. Рыбка. Уфа : РИЦ БашГУ, 2010. 268 с.
Кирсанова И.В. Многозначность семантики текста как реализация индивидуальных стратегий понимания : автореф. … дис. канд. филол. наук. Уфа : БашГУ, 2007. 21 с.
Лихачёв Д.С. Первые семьсот лет русской литературы // Избранные работы. СПб. : Худ. лит., 1987. Т. 2.
Закон Божий (для семьи и школы). N.Y., 1987. 723 c.
Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград : Перемена, 2002. С. 221-230.
 «Counter-text» as evaluative thinking form in information understanding process (based on the Bible text) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

«Counter-text» as evaluative thinking form in information understanding process (based on the Bible text) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

Download file