Fact invariance in terms of phenomenology of perception | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

Fact invariance in terms of phenomenology of perception

Topicality of such a systemically important factor for cognitive andhistorical complexes as knowledge systems is inevitable in terms of modern scientific and pseudo-scientific discourse. The systemicallyimportant factor is also a demonstration of the phenomenon of intersubjectivity constituting the united discourse field at a certainhistorical stage of intellectual generation. The present article covers the assumption that fact as a reality simulation constituted in acertain way is grounded on the object as a determining factor of ''universality'', since the infinitely variable representation of the latter isabsolutely impossible beyond the fact; the transcendent nature of fact and its perception conditioned by two aspects - ontological andepistemological are also considered; intentionality of context always predetermines not only the real state of affairs but also the potentialone, like the simulation that would be otherwise impossible; the assumption that science not taking into account possible ''sources ofmistakes'' (E. Mach) is of rather doubtful quality, has also been considered; also the phenomenological aspect of knowledge ofE. Husserl is compared to the conception of ''all-encompassing unity'' of V. Solovyov in the article; the synthetic nature of an act of thefact's constitution is supposed to be determined by the preceding comprehensive experience of Self. Thus, the I, structuring the model ofreality in the broadest sense, practically gives structure to the possible perspectives/borders, acceptable from the point of perception andreflection, perspectives/borders and synthetic nature of the created epistemological space cannot be abolished by the means of thecommon rules. The transcendental nature of the fact and of its perception is defined by two aspects - ontological and epistemological.Infinite variability of the stimulated reality excludes the monopoly of the rational as stimulation can only be possible with application ofall the means known and available to us (in any sense thereof). Conditions accuracy (E. Mach) is established by the systemicallyimportant factor, the transcendental nature of which indicates that the simulation is syncretical. Knowledge substantiality as its mainproblem (according to V.A. Lektorsky) can be defined only within the cultural and historical context.

Download file
Counter downloads: 236

Keywords

факт, объект, интерсубъективность, прафеномен, дискурс, fact, object, intersubjectivity, praphenomenon, discourse

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Goncharenko Mark V.Russian University of Cooperation, Kaliningrad Affiliatemarkgon73@rambler.ru
Всего: 1

References

Касавин И.Т. Что недостаточно знать о знании // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2009. Т. 21, № 3.
Антология мировой философии : в 4 т. М., 1969. Т. 1, ч. 2.
Гуссерль. Э. Картезианские размышления. URL: htpp://elenakosilova.ru/studia/Husserl.htm (дата обращения 23.06.2011).
Поппер К. Объективное знание // Логика и рост научного знания. М. : Прогресс, 1983. 605 с.
Соловьев В. Критика отвлеченных начал. Минск : Харвест, 1999. 912 с.
Лекторский. О проблеме знания // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2009. Т. 21, № 3.
Мах Э. Познание и заблуждение. М. : БИНОМ; Лаборатория знаний, 2010. 456 с.
Суровцев В., Сыров В. Языковая игра и роль метафоры в научном познании. URL: htpp://ru. Philosophy.kiev.ua/library/surovtsev/syrov. html (дата обращения 13.05.2011).
Юнг К.Г. Синхрония. М. : АСТ, 2010. 347 с.
 Fact invariance in terms of phenomenology of perception | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

Fact invariance in terms of phenomenology of perception | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. № 362.

Download file