Waterfalls as geological heritage sites
Waterfalls are unique natural objects. Their physical (height, width, cliff angle) and hydrological (water discharge) parameterscan be measured easily to allow judgements about their uniqueness. However, waterfalls are interesting not only from the point of viewof physical geography, but also geology. Generally, the uniqueness of geological heritage sites is determined by their information value.Waterfalls offer, at least, five kinds of information about the geological environment. Firstly, they characterize the geological activity ofsurficial streams with the steep longitudal profile. This occurs, first of all, in the forms of cliff erosion via its undercutting with periodicrockfalls, gradual detachment of sedimentary particles from the waterfall face, stream cutting at the very edge of the cliff, and formationof potholes at the base of waterfall because of hydraulic power and mechanical destruction by transported sedimentary load. Secondly,waterfalls offer some information about geological phenomena, which control their spatial occurrence. Thirdly, peculiar geologicalfeatures can be exposed in cliffs and adjacent slopes of the river valley. Fourthly, the formation of waterfall and the subsequent landformchanges is linked to the engineering-geological properties of rock massifs, including rock strength, fracturing, etc. Fifthly, studies ofancient waterfalls permit to obtain a very special information about the geological history of the given region (for instance, aboutcatastrophic events such as outflows from glacial lakes). The uniqueness of geological information represented in a given waterfall, and,consequently, the rank of the latter, do not depend completely on its physical and hydrological parameters. On the one hand, a largerwaterfall exhibits stronger geological activity of surficial streams. But, on the other hand, rare geological objects can be exposed in cliffsof even very little waterfalls. Aesthetic attractiveness of waterfalls may diminish their importance as sources of the new knowledge, butthe same attractiveness stimulates tourists to visit these sites. By example of waterfalls, it becomes clear that the concept of geodiversityextends far beyond geological environment itself. This fact, however, does not mean improvements of the available approaches for thenumerical assessment of geodiversity. In Russia, it is possible to outline a number of territories, where waterfalls diversify the regionalgeological heritage substantially. A typical example is the mountainous part of the Republic of Adygea in the Northern Caucasus, wherea number of waterfalls are known from the unique centre of geodiversity.
Keywords
водопад,
геологическое наследие,
геотуризм,
георазнообразие,
Северный Кавказ,
waterfall,
geological heritage,
geotourism,
geodiversity,
Northern CaucasusAuthors
Ruban Dmitry A. | Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don) | ruban-d@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Haghe J.-P. Do waterfalls have value in themselves? A metamorphosis in the values of the Gimel waterfall in France // Policy and Society. 2011. Vol. 30. P. 249-256.
Plumb G.A. A scale for comparing the visual magnitude of waterfalls // Earth-Science Reviews. 1993. Vol. 34. P. 261-270.
Пахомова Н.А., Рубан Д.А. Особенности рекреационного освоения памятников природы гидролого-гидрогеологического типа // Научная мысль Кавказа. Междисциплинарные и специальные исследования. 2008. № 2. С. 182-184.
Шварцбах М. Великие памятники природы (Известные места геологических исследований). М. : Мир, 1973. 336 с.
Короновский Н.В., Якушова А.Ф. Общая геология. М. : Высш. шк., 1991. 416 с.
Мильничук В.С., Арабаджи М.С. Общая геология. М. : Недра, 408 с.
Grotzinger J., Jordan T.H., Press F., Siever R. Understanding Earth. N.Y. : W.H. Freeman and Co., 2007. 579 p.
Lutgens F.K., Tarbuck E.J., Tasa D. Foundations of Earth Science. Upper Saddle River : Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011. 506 p.
Рубан Д.А. Геоконсервация как метод сохранения геологического наследия России // Отечественная геология. 2006. № 2. С. 78-81.
Hayakawa Y.S., Matsukura Y. Stability analysis of waterfall cliff face at Niagara Falls: An implication to erosional mechanism of waterfall // Engineering Geology. 2010. Vol. 116. P. 178-183.
Lamb M.P., Howard A.D., Dietrich W.E., Perron J.T. Formation of amphitheater-headed valleys by waterfall erosion after large-scale slumping on Hawaii // Geological Society of America Bulletin. 2007. Vol. 119. P. 805-822.
Chen J., Zhang D.D., Wang S., Xiao T., Huang R. Factors controlling tufa deposition in natural waters at waterfall sites // Sedimentary Geology. 2004. Vol. 166. P. 353-366.
Zhang D.D., Zhang Y., Zhu A., Cheng X. Physical Mechanisms of River Waterfall Tufa (Travertine) Formation // Journal of Sedimentary Research. 2001. Vol. 71. P. 205-216.
Рубан Д.А., Пугачев В.И. Хаджохский каньон и Гранитное ущелье (Адыгея, Россия) как геологические памятники природы // География и природные ресурсы. 2008. № 1. С. 62-66.
Lamb M.P., Dietrich W.E. The persistence of waterfalls in fractured rock // Geological Society of America Bulletin. 2009. Vol. 121. P. 1123-1134.
Rudoy A.N. Glacier-dammed lakes and geological work of glacial superfloods in the Late Pleistocene, Southern Siberia, Altai Mountains // Quaternary International. 2002. Vol. 87. P. 119-140.
Лапо А.В., Вдовец М.С. Проблема сохранения геологического наследия России // Отечественная геология. 1996. № 9. С. 6-12.
Лапо А.В., Давыдов В.И., Пашкевич Н.Г. и др. Методические основы изучения геологических памятников природы России // Стратиграфия. Геологическая корреляция. 1993. № 6. С. 75-83.
Рубан Д.А. Геологические памятники: краткий обзор классификационных признаков // Известия вузов. Геология и разведка. 2005. № 4. С. 67-69.
Рубан Д.А. Стандартизация описания геологических памятников природы как важных объектов национального наследия // География и природные ресурсы. 2006. № 3. С. 166-168.
Рубан Д.А. Проблемы идентификации геологических памятников // Известия ВУЗов. Геология и разведка. 2009. № 4. С. 72-73.
Рубан Д.А. Эстетическая аттрактивность уникального центра георазнообразия в Горной Адыгее для туристов // Актуальные проблемы гостинично-туристического бизнеса и сервиса. Саратов : Наука, 2011. Вып. 2. С. 64-67.
Gray M. Geodiversity: developing the paradigm // Proceedings of the Geologistsʼ Association. 2008. Vol. 199. P. 287-298.
Hjort J., Luoto M. Can geodiversity be predicted from space? // Geomorphology. 2012. Vol. 153-154. P. 74-80.
Ruban D.A. Quantification of geodiversity and its loss // Proceedings of the Geologistsʼ Association. 2010. Vol. 121. P. 326-333.
Serrano E., Ruiz-Flano P. Geomorphosites and geosidervsity // Geomorphosites. Munchen : Dr. F. Pfeil, 2009. P. 49-61.
Рубан Д.А. Уникальные центры георазнообразия - основа для