Cognitive studies and neurolinguistics: modern state and perspectives of future studies
The main approaches of cognitive neurolinguistics were reviewed in the paper. Cognitive linguistics studies brain mechanisms of speech processing and speech generation in their interrelation with human cognition. Fundamental neurolinguistic ideas were formulated within philosophy of language. However, philosophy of language is not uniform. There are several different methodological approaches. In particular, such directions as structuralism, formalism and philosophy of activity could be differentiated from each other. Each of these approaches of philosophy of language was applied in empirical neurolinguistics. Structuralism concentrates on studies of the phonologic, syntactic and semantic relations in speech stimuli. Besides, structuralism is focused on researching the communicative function of speech. Within neurolinguistics it conducts research of brain processes connected with recognition of speech structures in various languages. The main attention of researchers is focused on the analysis of relationships between the language structure and structure of brain connections. Also, features of speech structure under conditions of brain pathologies are studied in this approach. The disorder of brain structure is considered as a reason of structural disorder in speech. Formalism sets the purpose of creating an "ideal" language and comparing it with a natural language. This philosophical direction is aimed at elaboration of special artificial languages with fixed syntactical rules. In neurolinguistics it leads to comparison of brain processes during natural languages and quasi-language symbols (mathematics, music, programming languages) perception. Activity approach is aimed at researching language pragmatics, i.e. language role in real human life. In this approach distinction between communicative and cognitive speech functions is postulated. In neurolinguistics this direction led to the study of the role of extra-language context in formation and realization of brain mechanisms of speech activity. In particular, the influence of social-cultural context on development and compensation of speech-related pathologies at neurologic disorders is studied in this approach. A special problem of activity approach is in study of speech function in regulation of behavior. Thus, basic distinctions in philosophical understanding of language lead to emergence of several independent directions of empirical researches.
Keywords
нейролингвистика,
когнитивные исследования,
философия языка,
деятельностный подход,
neurolinguistics,
cognitive studies,
philosophy of language,
activity approachAuthors
Savostyanov Aleksandr N. | Scientific-Research Institute of Physiology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk State University | Alexander.Savostyanov@gmail.com |
Palchunov Dmitriy Ye. | Institute of Mathematics. Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk); Novosibirsk State University | palch@math.nsc.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Савостьянов А.Н. Психофизиологическая проблема в русской науке. Новосибирск, 2000. 127 с.
Апресян Ю.Д. Идеи и методы современной структурной лингвистики. М., 1966.
Соссюр Фердинанд де. Курс общей лингвистики. М. : Едиториал УРСС, 2004. 43 с.
Grice H.P. Presupposition and Conversational Implicature // P. Cole (ed.). Radical Pragmatics. N. Y. : Academic Press, 1981. P. 183-198.
Kristensen L.B., Wang L., Petersson K.M., Hagoort P. The Interface Between Language and Attention: Prosodic Focus Marking Recruits a General Attention Network in Spoken Language Comprehension. Cereb Cortex, 2012.
Basar E. (Ed.) Brain Functions and Oscillations. II. Integrative Brain Function. Neurophysiology and Cognitive Processes. Springer ; Berlin ; Heidelberg, 1999.
Friedrich M., Herold B., Friederici A.D. ERP correlates of processing native and non-native language word stress in infants with different language outcomes // Cortex. 2009. № 45(5). P. 662-676.
Hagoort P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations // J Cogn Neurosci. 2003. № 15(6). P. 883-899.
Черниговская Т.В, Деглин В.Л., Меншуткин В.В. Функциональная специализация полушарий мозга человека и нейрофизиологические механизмы языковой компетенции // Доклады АН СССР. 1982. Т. 267, № 2. С. 499-502.
Леутин В.П, Николаева Е.И. Функциональная асимметрия мозга. Мифы и действительность. СПб. : Речь, 2008. 368 с.
Вольф Н.В., Разумникова О.М, Тарасова И.В. Стратегия и результат: половые различия в электрографических коррелятах вербальной и образной креативности // Физиология человека. 2009. № 3. С. 31-41.
Бехтерева Н.П. Здоровый и больной мозг человека. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. Л. : Наука, 1988. 262 с.
Stoodley C.J., Stein J.F. Cerebellar Function in Developmental Dyslexia. Cerebellum, 2012.
Хомский Н. Знание и язык. М. : Наука, 1986.
Ruschemeyer S.A., Zysset S., Friederici A.D. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment. Neuroimage. 2006. № 31(1). Р. 354365.
Liu Y, Shu H, Wei J. Spoken word recognition in context: evidence from Chinese ERP analyses. Brain Lang. 2006. № 96(1). P. 37-48.
Платон. Собр. соч. : в 4 т. М. : Мысль, 1994. Т. 1.
Петрушенко Л А. Философия Лейбница на фоне эпохи. М. : Альфа-М, 2009. 510 с.
Витгенштейн Л. Логико-философский трактат. М. : Мысль, 2001.
Мальцев А.И. Алгебраические системы. М. : Наука, 1970. 392 с.
The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications / cd. by F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D.L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, P.F. Patel-Schneider. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010. 624 p.
Fitch W.T., Friederici A.D. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview // Philosopical Transaction of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012. 367(1598). Р. 1933-1955.
Витгенштейн Л. Философские исследования. М. : Мысль, 2001.
Austin J.L. How to do Things with Words. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1962.
Пальчунов Д.Е. Алгебраическое описание смысла высказываний естественного языка. Модели когнитивных процессов. Новосибирск, 1997. Вып. 158: Вычислительные системы. С. 127-148.
Searle J.R., Vanderveken D. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge : University Press, 1985.
ЛурияА.Р. Язык и сознание. М., 1998.
Обухова Л.Ф. Детская психология: теории, факты, проблемы. М., 1995.
Yang H.H., Savostyanov A.N., Tsai A.C, Liou M. Face recognition in Asperger syndrome: a study on EEG spectral power changes // Neuroscience Letter. 2011. Vol. 492, № 2. С. 84-88.
Ivanitsky A.M., Nikolaev A.R., Ivanitsky G.A. Cortical connectivity during word association search // Int J Psychophysiol. 2001. № 42(1). Р. 35-53.