US policy in South Asia after the end of Cold war | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 372.

US policy in South Asia after the end of Cold war

US strategy in South Asia after the Cold war was driven by a desire to build the balance of power that would shut out the growth of any regional hegemony. Attention that US gave to South Asia resulted from the end of the Cold war situation in the region: confrontation between India and Pakistan which strove for possession of nuclear weapons that could lead to the destabilization of the whole region. In the beginning of 1990s US tried to decide whether to continue support of Pakistan, their close ally during the Cold war, or it is better to strengthen relations with the developing India, and which of the two is worth being the US strategic partner. In 1994 the first step to improve relations between India and US was made. At the meeting with prime-minister of India Narosima Rao the issues of economic and trade cooperation as well as nonproliferation of nuclear weapons were raised. By the end of 1990s US focus on relations with India became clearer; it can be explained by the shift in India's policy from ''alienated democracy'' to ''attractive democracy'' in the post-cold era. In 1998 India and Pakistan tested nuclear weapons. Those nuclear tests led to a shift in US foreign policy: from nonproliferation of nuclear weapons to much broader goals. The goals were to prevent nuclear war, to promote the spread of democracy and international stability, to ensure economic growth and to foster political and military cooperation. Despite the fact that Indo-Pakistani nuclear tests had polarized US Congress, Clinton administration's strive to promote cooperation with South Asia was heightened with US national interest. In general, US policy in South Asia at this period of time could be described as a rethinking of the region's role in terms of US strategic interests. In fact at some time the change of US geographic priorities can be noted. The continuous maneuvering between India and Pakistan is the evidence that White House sought, on the one hand, not to lose Pakistan with its influence in Afghanistan, and, on the other hand, to show a willingness to make concessions to India in order to build new relations which could overgrow to the strategic partnership. Further the Republican Party went the same path when it tried to come closer with India and prevent rapprochement between Pakistan and China.

Download file
Counter downloads: 322

Keywords

Южная Азия, внешняя политика США, Индия, Пакистан, South Asia, US policy, India, Pakistan

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Gavrilova Vera A.Tomsk State University; Novosibirsk State Technical UniversityGavrilova.nsk@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

US policy towards India and Pakistan. National security decision directive 147. The White House. October 11, 1984. URL: http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsdd/nsdd-147.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2011).
H.R. 5368. Foreign operations, export financing and related programs appropriations act, 1993. Sec. 620 F Nuclear nonproliferation policy in South Asia. URL: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c102:2:./temp/~c102h3XIva:e154333 (дата обращения: 23.03.20
US policy towards South Asia in the Post-cold war era. Taipei : Sheng-Chih Book Co.Ltd., 2003. URL: http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~ti/Journal/8- 3/832.pdf (дата обращения: 15.02.2011).
US Security policy toward South Asia after September 11th and its implications for China: a Chinese Perspective, Zhang Guihong, Zhejing University, January 2003, The Henry L. Stimson Center. URL: http://www.idsa.in/system/files/strategicanalysis_zguihong_
India-US relations. April 8.2003. URL: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/61525.pdf
US Arms sales to Pakistan. Richard F. Grimmett. Congressional research service. August 24, 2009. URL: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS22757.pdf (дата обращения: 14.02.2011).
Nuclear sanctions: section 102 (b) of the Arms Export Control Act and Its Application to India and Pakistan. Jeanne Grimmet. Congressional research service. URL: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA477888 (дата обращения: 15.03.2011).
Concurrent resolution. 210 expressing the strong support of the Congress for the recently concluded elections in the Republic of India and urging the President to travel to India. Mr. Ackerman, 106th Congress. 1st session, October 27, 1999. URL: http://ww
Concurrent resolution. 211 expressing the strong support of the Congress for the recently concluded elections in the Republic of India and urging the President to travel to India. In the Senate of the United States. November 17, 1999, 106th Congress, 1st
H. Res. 572 (106th): US. September 13, 2000. URL: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/106/hres572/text (дата обращения: 23.03.2011).
An Act making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,2000 and for other purposes. 106th Congress. H.R.2561. URL: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c106:6:./temp/~c106ZD1JL0 (дата обращения: 28.03.2011).
 US policy in South Asia after the end of Cold war | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 372.

US policy in South Asia after the end of Cold war | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 372.

Download file