Biographical method in everyday political sociology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 373.

Biographical method in everyday political sociology

In modern sociological theories the global research is interwoven with everyday life study. The scientific interest to everyday life is provoked by changing borders of public and private space, appearing new forms of political participation. Everyday life sociology actively uses qualitative methods of research. Address to biographies as a method of collecting socially important information is a reflection of individual modern life. Sociologists characterize biography as a social construction which reflects everyday life event structure. Using a biographical approach in the political and sociological researches allows us to understand at least two points. First, is political activity a form of processing the specific biographical experience? And second, what is the status of political everyday life in an individualized life project? The article is devoted to the review of biographical method potential study in political sociology of everyday life. The author discovers two research traditions in everyday political sociology and shows the opportunities of applying biographical analysis in given directions. In political sociology of everyday life there are two alternative approaches in everyday world analysis: frame and practice theory. The frame is considered as a matrix of possible events and scheme of events interpretation. In frame-analytic tradition of everyday political sociology the biographical method is used for public movement study. Framing is defined as an activity of the movement to create a semantic framework, which ensures public support. According to the framing concept social movements comprise various biographical types participating in collective actions frame production in different ways. Biographic method allows us to study not only what (frame) and how (framing) but also why keying of frame form the corresponding process. In political sociology of everyday practice a discussion of methodological ''combination'' of biography research and discourse-analysis dates back to criticizing Michel Foucault's human sciences. The philosopher puts forward a thesis about new fragment subject appearance. He emphasizes that an individual has become an object of scientific discourse due to appearing discipline control mechanism. In Foucault's theory of subjectivity the individual is made as a subject and individuals construct their own identity themselves. Foucault's works stimulate biographical study. Biographical study and discourse analysis are methodologically interrelated as discourse is a part of biographical background knowledge, subjects take part in discourse reproduction. Discourse and biography can be regarded as order concepts within authority relations.

Download file
Counter downloads: 479

Keywords

biography, practice concept, frame-analytic, everyday life, political sociology, биография, концепт практик, фрейм-анализ, повседневная жизнь, политическая социология

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Plotichkina Natalia V.Kuban State University (Krasnodar)oochronos@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Schiebel M. Diskursive und biografische Konstruktion politischer Staatsfeind/innen. Kommunistinnen und Kommunisten in der frUhen Bundesrepub-lik Deutschland// Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2011. № 2. URL: http://w
Tuider E. Diskursanalyse und Biographieforschung. Zum Wie und Warum von Subjektpositionierungen // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2007. № 2. URL:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/249/549
Фуко М. Порядок дискурса // Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. М. : Касталь, 1996. С. 49-95.
Плотичкина Н.В. Политическая социология повседневности: концепт практик versus концепт фреймов // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2010. Т. 6, № 2. С. 227-240.
Miethe I. Framingkonzepte aus biographischer Perspektive (Das Beispiel der Frauenfriedensbewegung der DDR) // Forschungsjournal NSB. 2001. № 14. S. 65-75.
Schaffer T, Volter B. Subjekt-Positionen. Michel Foucault und die Biografieforschung // Volter B., Dausien B., Lutz H., Rosenthal G. Biographiefor schung im Diskurs. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag fUr Sozialwissenschaften, 2005. S. 161-181.
Miethe I., Roth S. Zum Verhaltnis von Biographie- und Bewegungsforschung // Volter B., Dausien B., Lutz H., Rosenthal G. Biographieforschung im Diskurs. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag fUr Sozialwissenschaften, 2005. S. 103-119.
Бурдье П. Биографическая иллюзия // Интер. 2002. № 1. С. 75-84.
Fischer-Rosenthal W The problem with identity: Biography as Solution to Some (Post)-Modernist Dilemmas // Comenius. 1995. № 15. P. 250-265.
Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.
Heinze C. «Das Private wird politisch» - interdisziplinare Perspektiven auf autobiografisches Schreiben im Horizont von Erinnerungskulturen und Zeitgeschichte // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2011. № 2. URL: http:/
Rosenthal G. Die erzahlte Lebensgeschichte als historisch-soziale Realitat. Methodologische Implikationen fur die Analyse biographischer Texte // Berliner Geschichtswerkstatt: Alltagskultur, Subjektivitat und Geschichte. MUnster : Westfalisches Dampfboot,
 Biographical method in everyday political sociology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 373.

Biographical method in everyday political sociology | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2013. № 373.

Download file