Dynamics in the phytomass of meadows in the middle Ob floodplain during the growing season | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2024. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/68/11

Dynamics in the phytomass of meadows in the middle Ob floodplain during the growing season

The article is related to the study of the dynamics in the phytomass in order to understand the mechanisms of circulation and establish the initial conditions for the retention of organic carbon in the floodplain ecosystem. During the 2023 growing season, the rhythmics of the primary production process of meadow phytocenoses of the middle Ob floodplain were studied. The research was carried out at the Kaibasovo stationary of Tomsk State University (57°14'44.0391"N, 84°11'00.2761"E), located within the subzone of the southern taiga, the Shegarsky segment of the Ob floodplain (see Fig. 1). 4 non-mowed phytocenoses were studied: mixed-grass, mixed-herb elecampane (ass. Poo angustifoliae-Festucetumpratensis Mirk. In Denisova et al., 1986), veiny-sedge (Ass. Thalictro-Phalaroidetum (Libbert 1931) Taran, 1995), mixed-grass-sod-sedge (ass. Sanguisorbo oficinalis-Caricetum cespitosae Taran 1995). Hayfields were also studied - two trial areas - analogues of grass-grass and veiny-sedge phytocenoses. The dynamics of the aboveground phytomass of meadows was considered by components - green mass, litter, standing dead plant biomass. Sampling of aboveground phytomass was carried out monthly from May to October. Geobotanical relives was carried out on permanent test areas with a size of 100 m2, samples of aboveground phytomass were taken from five squares with a size of 0.25 m2. In the wet state, the mowing was sorted by species, then dried to an air-dry state and weighed to identify species diversity, the composition of dominants, the ratio of biological (cereals, sedges, grasses, legumes) and ecological groups species (see Tables 2, 3). The change in underground phytomass was studied in a soil layer of 0-20 cm, the ratio of standing phytomass and mortmass was analyzed in three periods - early July, September, October. Soil monoliths with a volume of 10 cm3 were selected in the center of the sloping sites in layers 0-10 and 10-20 cm to determine the underground mass. The underground phytomass was washed from the soil using a sieve with a 0.25 mm hole, stained and dried in a drying cabinet for 24 hours at a temperature of 80 degrees, then weighed [13]. For each sample area, the average values were determined from all five repetitions, after which the reserves of all components of the plant substance were expressed in grams per square meter. The roots were divided into fractions - living (B) and dead (V) in appearance using certain features according to the method. Analysis of monthly average air temperatures and precipitation (see Table 1) during the growing seasons of 2022 and 2023, and comparing the data with the average for the previous 10 years showed that the weather conditions in spring and early summer of 2023 were cold and dry, and starting in July - warm and humid. The flood of 2023 was low and the meadows of the high manes were not flooded by flood waters, and the humidification of the meadows of the lower parts of the slopes of the manes was ensured by the rise of the groundwater level during the flood. It was found that phytomass of the studied communities ranges from 1288 to 3763 g/m2, the share of the aboveground part ranges from 18 to 23%. In all meadows, there is a significant excess of reserves of living underground mass over the mortmass at all observation periods (see Table 4). The ratio of green biomass to the biomass of living roots is 0.3-0.4 at high relief positions and from 0.1 to 0.3 at low positions. All indicators are lower than those published [15] on stocks of phytomass of floodplain meadows in the area of Kolpashevo. These low values indicate a significant excess of the underground mass over the aboveground mass, which reflects the peculiarities of the functioning of floodplain grass ecosystems. The revealed seasonal changes in phytomass indicate the role of the individual rhythm of development of dominant species in the formation of grassland phytomass reserves, whichmust be taken into account in the timing of sampling to determine primary productivity. In general, the ratio of phytomass fractions (litter, standing dead plant biomass, green mass) is determined both by the influence of weather conditions and the composition of the dominant meadows. Under the influence of changing hydro-climatic conditions in communities, significant changes in phytomass occur during the season, with the bulk of the plant matter accumulating in the mortmass. In arid conditions, there is a decrease in the mass of grasslands and the accumulation of dead plant residues. With increasing humidity, the total aboveground mass increases, while the proportion of dead plant matter decreases. There are differences in fluctuations of green phytomass for different meadows during the growing season: two rises of green mass (July and August-September) are characteristic for grasslands of various grasses, one maximum was revealed for veiny-sedge and grass-sod meadows in August. There are two maxima of standing dead plant biomass, formation - spring and autumn. Active decomposition of the litter occurs in August on mixed-herb (elecampane), veiny-sedge and mixed-grass-sod meadows, and on mixed-grass-cereal - decomposition of the litter begins in September. The processes of dying off of living underground phytomass in conditions of sufficient moisture proceed more intensively than in conditions of drier phytocenoses. The distribution of underground phytomass in the upper and lower soil layers may depend on the humidity of the habitat, which is associated with the position in the relief of the floodplain, as well as on the structure of the plant community, the greatest concentration of phytomass is observed in the upper soil horizon (see Table 4). The article contains 6 Figures, 4 Tables, 29 References. The work was carried out using the equipment of the Unique scientific installation "System of experimental bases located along the latitudinal gradient" TSU. The Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Download file
Counter downloads: 4

Keywords

Ob floodplain, meadow communities, reserve of aboveground and underground phytomass

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Shepeleva Ludmila F.Tomsk State University; Sakhalin State Universityshepelevalf@mail.ru
Kolesnichenko Larisa G.Tomsk State Universityklg77777@mail.ru
Churakov Egor Е.Tomsk State Universitygeorgy-chaika@yandex.ru
Pudova Marina С.Tomsk State Universitymarina.teslinova@gmail.com
Rozhkova-Timina Inna O.Sakhalin State Universityinna.timina@mail.ru
Vorobyev Sergey N.Tomsk State Universitysoil@green.tsu.ru
Всего: 6

References

Jaramillo V.J., Kauffman J., Renteria-Rodriguez L., Cummings D.L., Ellingson L.J. Biomass, carbon, and nitrogen pools in Mexican tropical dry forest landscapes // Ecosystems. 2003. Vol. 6. PP. 609-629.
Schulze E.D., Beck E., Muller-Hohenstein K. Plant Ecology. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2005. 702 p.
Cole J.J., Prairie Y.T., Caraco N.F., McDowell W.H, Tranvik L.J., Striegl R.G., Duarte C.M., Kortelainen P., Downing J.A., Middelburg J.J., Melack J. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget // Ecosystems. 2007. Vol. 10. PP. 172-185.
Walter R.C., Merritts D.J. Natural streams and the legacy of aterpoweredmills // Science. 2008. Vol. 319. PP. 299-304.
Kayranli B., Scholz M., Mustafa A., Hedmark A. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review // Wetlands. 2010. Vol. 30. PP. 111-124.
Cierjacks A., Kleinschmit B., Babinsky M., Kleinschroth F., Markert A., Menzel M., Ziechmann U., Schiller T., Graf M., Lang F. Carbon stocks of soil and vegetation on Danubian floodplains // Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2010. Vol. 173. PP. 644-653. 10.1002/ jpln.200900209.
Hoffmann T., Mudd S.M., van Oost K., Verstraeten G., Erkens G., Lang A., Middelkoop H., Boyle J., Kaplan J.O., Willenbring J., Aalto R. Short Communication: Humans and the missing C-sink: erosion and burial of soil carbon through time // Earth Surface Dynamics Discussions. 2013. Vol. 1. PP. 93-112.
Sutfin N.A., Wohl E.E., Dwire K.A. Banking carbon: a review of organic carbon storage and physical factors influencing retention in floodplains and riparian ecosystems // Earth surface processes and landforms. 2016. Vol. 41. PP. 38-60.
Козлова Г.И. Продукция надземной и подземной частей луговых фитоценозов в разных экологических условиях поймы / под ред. Н.И. Базилевич, Л.Е. Родин // Биологическая продуктивность и круговорот химических элементов в растительных сообществах. Л.: Наука, 1971. С. 92-96.
Самбуу А.Д. Изменение чистой первичной продукции экосистем Тувы в связи с различным использованием земель // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2010. № 339. С. 172-177.
Биологическая продуктивность травяных экосистем. Географические закономерности и экологические особенности. 2-е изд. Новосибирск: ИПА СО РАН, 2018. 110 с.
Титлянова А.А., Шибарева С.В. Продуктивность травяных экосистем: справочник. М.: ООО "Издательство МБА", Почвенный институт имени В.В. Докучаева, Институт почвоведения и агрохимии СО РАН, 2020. 100 с.
Титлянова А.А., Косых Н.П., Миронычева-Токарева Н.П., Романова И.П. Подземные органы растений в травяных экосистемах. Новосибирск: Наука, 1996. 128 с.
Шепелева Л.Ф., Пудова М.С., Леденева Е.А., Колесниченко Л.Г. Надземная и подземная фитомассы луговых сообществ поймы Средней Оби (Кривошеинский район Томской области) // Журн. Сиб. федер. ун-та. Биология. 2023. №16 (4). С. 454-470.
Kosykh N.P., Mironycheva-Tokareva N.P., Peregon A.M. Productivity of Water Meadows under Haymaking in the Mid-Stream of the Ob River // Water. 2023. Vol. 15 (6). P. 1083.
Вагина Т.А., Шатохина Н.Г. Динамика запасов надземной и подземной органической массы степных, луговых и болотных фитоценозов / ред. Р.В. Ковалев // Структура, функционирование и эволюция системы биогеоценозов Барабы. Новосибирск: Наука, 1976. Т. 2. C. 217-265.
Шатохина Н.Г. Луговые степи и остепненные луга Западной Сибири, Новосибирская область/ ред. В.Б. Ильин // Биологическая продуктивность травяных экосистем. Географические закономерности и экологические особенности. Новосибирск: Наука, 1988. С. 30-38.
Понятовская В.М., Макаревич В.Н, Карпенко В.Н. и др. Продуктивность луговых сообществ. Л.: Наука, 1978. 287 с.
Петров И.Б. Обь-Иртышская пойма (типизация и качественная оценка земель) / ред. Л.Н. Ивановский, Г.В. Бачурин. Новосибирск: Наука, 1979. 136 с.
Vorobyev S.N., Pokrovsky O.S., Kirpotin S.N., Kolesnichenko L.G., Shirokova L.S., Manasypov R.M. Flood zone biogeochemistry of the Ob River middle course // Applied Geochemistry. 2015. Vol. 63. PP. 133-145.
Львов Ю.А. К характеристике растительности поймы реки Оби / ред. Б. Г. Иоганзен // Природа поймы реки Оби и ее хозяйственное освоение. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1963. С. 258-267.
Шепелева Л.Ф. Структура и динамика луговых сообществ поймы Средней Оби / ред. А. С. Ревушкин. Томск: Изд-во Том. гос. ун-та, 2019. 348 с.
Таран Г.С. Синтаксономия лугово-болотной растительности поймы Средней Оби (в пределах Александровского района Томской области) / под ред. В.П. Седельникова. Препринт. Новосибирск: Сибирское отделение Российской академии наук, Центральный сибирский ботанический сад, 1995. 79 с.
Программы и методы биогеоценотических исследований / под ред. В.Н. Сукачева. М.: Наука, 1966. 220 с.
Раменский Л.Г., Цаценкин И.А., Чижиков О.Н., Антипин Н.А. Экологическая оценка кормовых угодий по растительному покрову. М.: Сельхозгиз, 1956. 472 с.
Львов Ю.А., Шепелева Л.Ф., Лапшина Е.Д. Оценка пойменных лугов по флуктуационной способности их растительного покрова // Ботанический журнал. 1987. № 72 (5). С. 599-609.
Определитель растений Томской области. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2014. 464 с.
Работнов Т.А. Луговедение. М.: Московский университет [МГУ] им. М.В. Ломоносова, 1984. 320 с.
Серебрякова Т.И. Побегообразование и ритм сезонного развития растений заливных лугов Средней Оки // Ученые записки МГПИ им. В.И. Ленина. 1956. Т. 97, № 3. С. 43-119.
 Dynamics in the phytomass of meadows in the middle Ob floodplain during the growing season | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2024. №  68. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/68/11

Dynamics in the phytomass of meadows in the middle Ob floodplain during the growing season | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2024. № 68. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/68/11

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 189