Morphogenesis of Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings assimilating organs under the influence of red and blue LED light
In the article, the effect of red and blue LEDs light on the growth and development of 6-week-old seedlings of Scots pine and Norway spruce was studied. We carried out morphometric and anatomical studies of the cotyledons and needles, which showed that the red LED light has a similar stimulating effect on plants of Scots pine and Norway spruce, and the blue light reveals differences in the reaction of photosynthesizing organs. Species-specific feature of red LED light action was different in the reaction of shoot tips and activation or inhibition formation of new needles of pine and spruce. The analysis of the main photosynthetic pigments exposed to red or blue light showed the lack in the qualitative composition of photosynthetic pigments of needles seedlings. At the same time, there was reduction in pigment content in the needles of pine seedlings in growing under a red light. It is assumed that the observed difference between the reactions of seedlings of pine and spruce on red and blue light is associated with features of their habitats, which may significantly affect the photoregulation processes and adaptive capacity of the test plants. The studied seedlings species grown under red light differed from control plants by bigger needles, cotyledons and low content of photosynthetic pigments. As the red light is predominant in spectrum of photosynthesis and effectively absorbed by chlorophyll, the cultivation of plants under the red light should increase their productivity and stimulate photosynthesis and energy storage organ growth, as was observed in our experiments. It should be noted that the thickness of the mesophyll of the needles on the red light apparently occur in various ways in the studied plants: in pine needles increase in diameter by increasing cell size and in spruce activation of bilateral thickening is due to an increase in the number of the cells of mesophyll. The reduction in photosynthetic pigments on the red light in the two plants species in the range of 40-50% can be determined by a less need for the reaction centers of photosystems under the conditions of excess of light energy. Probably, the difference of signal properties of the red-light signal for the studied plants due to the peculiarities of habitat of seedlings of pine and spruce. Pine seedlings prefer open spaces, providing a full range of light, while the young spruce are formed mainly under the forest canopy, where the light is rich in red and far-red regions of the spectrum. The effect of blue LED light reveals a significant difference between the studied species. Photosynthesizing organs of pine seedlings grown in blue light did not have any strong differences from plants which were grown on "white" polychromatic light of fluorescent lamps. Spruce development was significantly inhibited by blue light: the plants had the smallest mass and thin needles, with a high content of chlorophyll. Despite the fact that the blue light has maximum energy, it is an important signaling factor for the plants involved in a variety of physiological and developmental processes. Growing conditions in which the plants of spruce got only blue light are so much different from the conditions of the natural environment where the region of the spectrum is significantly suppressed that seedlings were unable to adapt to this condition and were substantially behind the development of the control plants. It should not be ruled out that at later stages of growing of the studied plants they will react differently to the effects of red and blue light; as for the realization of certain stages of the life cycle (for example, during the formation of reproductive organs, embryogenesis, etc.), different spectral composition of light, including high blue light, may be favorable.
Keywords
Picea abies (L.) H. Karst,
Pinus sylvestris L,
needles,
cotyledons,
Picea abies (L.) H. Karst,
light-emitting diode, LED,
Pinus sylvestris L,
хвоя,
семядоли,
фотоморфогенез,
светоизлучающий диод (light-emitting diode, LED)Authors
Kartashov Aleksandr V. | Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences | botanius@ya.ru |
Pashkovskiy Pavel P. | Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences | pashkovskiy.pavel@gmail.com |
Ivanov Yury V. | Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences | ivanovinfo@mail.ru |
Ivanova Aleksandra I. | Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences | ivanovinfo@mail.ru |
Savochkin Yury V. | Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences | botanius@ya.ru |
Всего: 5
References
McCree K. J. Photosynthetically active radiation // Physiological Plant Ecology I. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1981. P. 41-55.
Ptushenko V.V., Ptushenko E.A., Samoilova O.P., Tikhonov A.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of Tradescantia species of different ecological groups: Induction events at different intensities of actinic light // Biosystems. 2013. Vol. 114. P. 85-97.
Bertamini M., Muthuchelian K., Nedunchezhian N. Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) grown under field conditions // Photosynthetica. 2006. Vol. 44. P. 227-234.
Иванов Ю.В., Савочкин Ю.В., Шумейко Е.В., Кузнецов Вл.В. Реализация раннего этапа онтогенеза сосны обыкновенной на фоне токсичных концентраций ионов меди // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2013. T. 21, № 1. С. 103-117.
Lichtenthaler H. K. [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic bio-membranes // Methods in enzymology. 1987. Т. 148. С. 350-382.
Иванов Ю.В., Савочкин Ю.В., Кузнецов Вл.В. Влияние минерального состава и pH питательной среды на устойчивость сосны обыкновенной к токсическому действию ионов цинка // Физиология растений. 2013. Т. 60, № 2. С. 257-267.
Тихомиров А.А., Лисовский Г.М., Сидько Ф.Я. Спектральный состав света и продуктивность растений. Новосибирск : Наука, 1991. 168 с.
Clapham D.H., Dormling I., Ekberg I., Eriksson G., Qamaruddin M., Vince-Prue D. Latitudinal cline of requirement for far-red light for the photoperiodic control of budset and extension growth in Picea abies (Norway Spruce) // Physiologia Plantarum. 1998. Vol. 102. P. 71-78.
Mukai Y., Tazaki K., Fujii T., Yamamoto N. Light-independent expression of three photosynthetic genes, CAB, RBCS, RBCL in coniferous plants // Plant and Cell Physiology. 1992. Vol. 33. P. 859-866.
Fernbach E., Mohr H. Coaction of blue ultraviolet A light and light absorbed by phytochrome in controlling growth of Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings // Planta. 1990. Vol. 180. P. 212-216.
Elmlinger M., Bolle C., Batschauer A. et al. Coaction of blue light and light absorbed by phytochrome in control of glutamine synthetase gene expression in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings // Planta. 1994. Vol. 192. P. 189-194.
Vince-Prue D. Contrasting types of photoperiodic response in the control of dormancy // Plant, Cell and Environment. 1984. Vol. 7. P. 507-513.
Ranade S., Abrahamsson S., Niem J., Garcia-GilM.R. Pinus taeda cDNA microarray as a tool for candidate gene identification for local red/far-red light adaptive response in Pinus sylvestris // American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013. Vol. 4. P. 479-493.
Ranade S.S., Garcia-Gil M.R. Ecotypic variation in response to light spectra in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) // Tree Physiology. 2013. Vol. 33. P. 195-201.
Шуберт Ф.Е. Светодиоды. Профессиональный справочник. М. : Физматлит, 2008. 496 с.
Цыганкова В.А., Галкина Л.А., Мусатенко Л.И., Сытник К.М. Генетический и эпигенетический контроль роста и развития растений. Гены фотоморфогенеза и регуляция их экспрессии светом // Биополимеры и клетка. 2004. Т. 20, № 6. С. 451-471.
Trouwborst G., Oosterkamp J., Hogewoning S., Harbinson J., Ieperen W. The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy // Physiologia Plantarum. 2010. Vol. 138. P. 289-300.
Brazaityte A., Duchovskis P., Urbonaviciute A. et al. The effect of light-emitting diodes lighting on the growth of tomato transplants // Agriculture. 2010. Vol. 97. P. 89-98.
Tepperman J., Hwang Y., Quail P. PhyA dominates in transduction of red-light signals to rapidly responding genes at the initiation of Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation // The Plant Journal. 2006. 48. P. 728-742.
Fankhauser C., Ulm R. Light-regulated interactions with SPA proteins underlie cryptochromemediated gene expression // Genes & Development. 2011. Vol. 25. P. 1004-1009.
Fana X., Xua Z., Liua X. et al. Effects of light intensity on the growth and leaf development of young tomato plants grown under a combination of red and blue light // Scientia Horticulturae. 2013. Vol. 153. P. 50-55.
Мартиросян Ю.Ц., Кособрюхов А.А., Креславский В.Д. и др. Фотосинтез и рост рас тений картофеля при выращивании в условиях аэропоники с дополнительным облучением светодиодами // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2008. № 3. С. 102-105.
Avercheva O., Berkovich Yu., Erokhin A. et al. Growth and photosynthesis of chinese cabbage plants grown under light-emitting diode-based light source // Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009. Vol. 56. P. 14-21.
Головацкая И.Ф., Карначук Р.А. Роль брассинолида в регуляции роста и гормонального баланса Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) на зеленом свету // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2010. № 1. С. 15-19.
Samuoliene G., Brazaityte A., Urbonaviciute A. et al. The effect ofred and blue light component on the growth and development of frigo strawberries // Agriculture. 2010. Vol. 97. P. 99-104.
Kook H.S., Park S.H., Jang Y.J. et al. Blue LED (light-emitting diodes)-mediated growth promotion and control of Botrytis disease in lettuce // Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Soil and Plant Science. 2013. Vol. 63. P. 271-277.
JaoR., Lai C., Fang W., ChangS. Effect of red light on the growth of Zantedeschia plantlets and tuber formation using light-emitting diodes // HortScience. 2005. Vol. 40. P. 436-438.
Shibayev P., Pergolizzi R. The effect of circularly polarized light on the growth of plants // International Journal of Botany. 2011. Vol. 7. P. 113-117.