Sexual forms and their ecological correlates of woody gymnosperms and angiosperms in Siberia
A principal goal of comparative biology is to determine the presence of correlations between morphological and ecological characters to gain an insight into the evolution and adaptive significance of organismal traits. This approach has been used in seed plants to understand the evolution of separate sexes from hermaphroditism. 326 species of woody seed plants belonging to 80 genera and 31 families are found in Siberia. Woody seed plants are characterized by a high degree of sexual differentiation: 26 species of gymnosperms form unisexual strobili and 126 species of angiosperms have unisexual flowers. At the family level, 16 of 31 families in Siberian flora contain hermaphroditic taxa (Ericaceae, Fabaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Ranunculaceae etc.). Five of 31 families have mixed sex expression types (hermaphroditic + nonhermaphroditic) within a family (Rosaceae, Grossulariaceae, Lamiaceae, Rhamnaceae, Thymelaeaceae). For the rest of the families, 10 of them are exclusively nonhermaphroditic (Salicaceae, Betulaceae, Ephedraceae, Pinaceae, Cupressaceae etc.). At the genus level, 52 of the 80 genera only contain hermaphroditic taxa (Rhododendron, Cotoneaster, Rosa, Spiraea, Caragana, Lonicera etc.), 5 of them contain hermaphroditic and nonhermaphroditic taxa (Daphne, Ribes, Dryas, Pentaphylloides, Thymus), 23 of them are exclusively nonhermaphroditic taxa (Juniperus, Epherda, Salix, Betula, Rhamnus etc.). In woody plants of Siberia four sexual forms are revealed: dioecy (114 species; 35.0%), monoecy (29 species; 8.9%), gynodioecy (6 species; 1.8%) and andromonoecy (3 species; 0.9%). We analyzed the relationship between sexual forms of plants and a number of their ecological and biological characteristics: life forms, mode of pollination, the structural features of fructifications, habitat type, zonal group and an ecological group. It is shown that dioecious plants are likely to be microphanerophytes, hygrophytes, have Eurasian or Asian-American areas, dry fructifications and grow in harsh alpine or arctic conditions. Monoecious plants are usually trees, megaphanerophytes or mesophytes with anemophilous pollination and dry fructifications, having Eurasian areas and being the main boreal species in Siberia. We revealed a highly unequal distribution of the general number of woody plants and the ratio of diclinous and hermaphrodite species in seven floristic provinces depending on their heat supply. Future work aimed at untangling the complex web of trait correlations with dioecy in terms of their presence, cause, and priority will be critical for understanding the ecological mechanisms responsible for the evolution of separate sexes from combined sexes in flowering plants. The article contains 3 figures, 58 ref.
Keywords
Siberia,
ecological correlates,
angiosperms,
gymnosperms,
woody plants,
sexual forms,
Сибирь,
экологические корреляции,
покрытосеменные,
голосеменные,
древесные растения,
половые формыAuthors
Godin Vladimir N. | Moscow State Pedagogical University | godinvn@yandex.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Vamosi J.C., Vamosi S.M. The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy // Evolution. 2004. Vol. 58, № 4. P. 723-731.
Whitehead D.R. Wind pollination in the angiosperms: evolutionary and environmental considerations // Evolution. 1969. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 28-35.
Stebbins G.L. Longevity, habitat, and release of genetic variability in the higher plants // Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1958. Vol. 23. P. 365-378.
Maynard Smith J. Evolution of sex. New York : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978. 222 p.
Steiner K.E. Dioecism and its correlates in the Cape flora of South Africa // American Journal of Botany. 1988. Vol. 75, № 11. P. 1742-1754.
Vamosi J.C., Otto S.P., Barrett S.C.H. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2003. Vol. 16, № 5. P. 10061018.
Petropavlovskii B.S., Urusov V.M., Brizhataya A.A. Distribution of life forms in the dendroflora of the Russian Far East in connection with heat supply and influence of the ocean // Russian Journal of Ecology. 2011. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 98-102.
Bertin R.I. The evolution and maintenance of andromonoecy // Evolutionary Theory. 1982. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 25-32.
Годин В.Н., Демьянова Е.И. О распространении гинодиэции у цветковых растений // Ботанический журнал. 2013. Т. 98, № 12. C. 1465-1487.
Годин В.Н. Половой полиморфизм видов растений подкласса Caryophyllidae в Сибири. Обзор литературы // Растительный мир Азиатской России. 2013. № 2 (12). С. 55-60.
Годин В.Н. Половой полиморфизм видов растений подклассов Magnoliidae и Ranunculidae в Сибири. Обзор литературы // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Естественные науки. 2013. № 2. C. 70-77.
Godin V.N. Analysis of sexual polymorphism of the plant from subclass Rosidae in Siberia // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2012. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 337-342.
Годин В.Н. Половой полиморфизм у представителей подклассов Hamamelididae и Dilleniidae в Сибири: обзор литературы // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Биология и экология. 2012. Вып. 26, № 16. С. 95-106.
Krishnan R.M., Ramesh B.R. Endemism and sexual systems in the evergreen tree flora of the Western Ghats, India // Diversity and Distributions. 2005. Vol. 11, № 6. P. 559-565.
Ashton P.S. Speciation among tropical forest trees: some deductions in the light of recent evidence // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1969. Vol. 1, № 1-2. P. 155-196.
Adam P., Williams G. Dioecy, self-compatibility and vegetative reproduction in Australian subtropical rainforest trees and shrubs // Cunninghamia. 2001. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 89-100.
Годин В.Н. Половой полиморфизм видов растений подкласса Lamiidae в Сибири. Обзор литературы // Растительный мир Азиатской России. 2011. № 2 (8). С. 49-53.
Животовский Л.А. Популяционная биометрия. М. : Наука, 1991. 271 с.
Черепанов С.К. Сосудистые растения России и сопредельных государств. СПб. : Мир и семья-95, 1995. 990 с.
Takhtajan A. Flowering plants. Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2009. 871 p.
Куминова А.В. Растительный покров Алтая. Новосибирск : Наука, 1960. 450 с.
Растительный покров Хакасии / под ред. А.В. Куминовой. Новосибирск : Наука, 1976. 424 с.
Секретарева Н.А. Сосудистые растения Российской Арктики и сопредельных территорий. М. : КМК, 2004. 131 с.
Безделев А.Б., Безделева Т.А. Жизненные формы семенных растений Дальнего Востока России. Владивосток : Дальнаука, 2006. 296 c.
Малышев Л.И., Пешкова Г.А. Особенности и генезис флоры Сибири (Предбайкалье и Забайкалье). Новосибирск : Наука, 1984. 265 с.
Cruden R.W., Lloyd R.M. Embryophytes have equivalent sexual phenotypes and breeding systems: why not a common terminology to describe them? // American Journal of Botany. 1995. Vol. 82, № 6. P. 816-825.
Годин В.Н. Половая дифференциация у растений. Термины и понятия // Журнал общей биологии. 2007. Т. 68, № 2. С. 98-108.
Raunkiaer C. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1934. 632 p.
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1899. Bd II. T. II. 705 s.
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1904. Bd III. T. I. 570 s.
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1905. Bd III. T. II. 598 s.
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1898. Bd I. 400 s.
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Leipzig : Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1898. Bd II. T. I. 696 s.
Флора Сибири. Pyrolaceae-Lamiaceae (Labiatae) / под ред. Л.И. Малышева. Новосибирск : Наука, 1997. Т. 11. 296 с.
Флора Сибири. Дополнения, исправления, указатели к томам 1-13 / под ред. Л.И. Малышева, Г. А. Пешковой, К.С. Байкова. Новосибирск : Наука, 2004. Т. 14. 188 с.
Флора Сибири. Geraniaceae-Cornaceae / под ред. Г.А. Пешковой. Новосибирск : Наука, 1996. Т. 10. 253 c.
Флора Сибири. Solanaceae-Lobeliaceae / под ред. А.В. Положий, Г.А. Пешковой. Новосибирск : Наука, 1996. Т. 12. 207 c.
Флора Сибири. Portulacaceae-Ranunculaceae / под ред. Л.И. Малышева, Г.А. Пешковой. Новосибирск : Наука, 1993. Т. 6. 309 с.
Флора Сибири. Berberidaceae-Grossulariaceae / под ред. Л.И. Малышева, Г.А. Пешковой. Новосибирск : Наука, 1994. Т. 7. 311 с.
Флора Сибири. Fabaceae (Leguminosae) / под ред. А.В. Положий, Л.И. Малышева. Новосибирск : Наука, 1994. Т. 9. 279 с.
Флора Сибири. Salicaceae-Amaranthaceae / под ред. И.М. Красноборова, Л.И. Малышева. Новосибирск : Наука, 1992. Т. 5. 311 с.
Флора Сибири. Lycopodiaceae-Hydrocharitaceae / под ред. И.М. Красноборова. Новосибирск : Наука, 1988. Т. 1. 199 с.
Флора Сибири. Rosaceae / под ред. А.В. Положий, Л.И. Малышева. Новосибирск : Наука, 1988. Т. 8. 199 с.
Vary L.B., Gillen D.L., Randrianjanahary M., Lowry P.P., Sakai A.K., Weller S.G. Dioecy, monoecy, and their ecological correlates in the littoral forest of Madagascar // Biotropica. 2011. Vol. 43, № 5. P. 582-590.
Серебряков И.Г. Экологическая морфология растений. М. : Высшая школа, 1962. 378 с.
Конспект флоры Сибири: сосудистые растения / под ред. К.С. Байкова. Новосибирск : Наука, 2005. 362 с.
Коропачинский И.Ю. Древесные растения Сибири. Новосибирск : Наука, 1983. 384 с.
ChenX.-S., Li Q.-J. Patterns of plant sexual systems in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests in Ailao Mountains, SW China // Journal of Plant Ecology. 2008. Vol. 1, № 3. P. 179-185.
GodleyE.J. Flower biology in New Zealand // New Zealand Journal of Botany. 1979. Vol. 17, № 4. P. 441-466.
Bawa K.S. Mating systems, genetic differentiation and speciation in tropical rain forest plants // Biotropica. 1992. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 250-255.
Gross C.L. A comparison of the sexual systems in the trees from the Australian tropics with other tropical biomes - more monoecy but why? // American Journal of Botany. 2005. Vol. 92, № 6. P. 907-919.
Fox J.F. Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal // Oecologia. 1985. Vol. 67, № 2. P. 244-249.
Bawa K.S., PerryD.R., Beach J.H. Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and incompatibility mechanisms // American Journal of Botany. 1985. Vol. 72, № 3. P. 331-345.
Renner S.S., Ricklefs R.E. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants // American Journal of Botany. 1995. Vol. 82, № 5. P. 596-606.
Коропачинский И.Ю., Встовская Т.Н. Древесные растения Азиатской России. Новосибирск : Изд-во СО РАН, 2002. 707 с.
Darwin C. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London : John Murray, 1877. 352 p.
Bawa K.S., Opler P.A. Dioecism in tropical forest trees // Evolution. 1975. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 167-179.
Tropical trees: variation, breeding, and conservation / cd. by J. Burley, J. Burley, B.T. Styles. London : Academic Press, 1976. 243 p.