Comparative analysis of PIA-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and destruction under hydrolytic factors | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI: 10.17223/19988591/29/3

Comparative analysis of PIA-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and destruction under hydrolytic factors

The ability of Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus epidermidis to adhere to and form biofilm on various polymeric and metallic surfaces of indwelling medical devices results in the fact that now these bacteria are one of the most common causes of serious nosocomial infections. Although the adhesion is an essential part of biofilm formation the primary contact between the bacterial cells and the solid surface do not always lead to a strong fixation of bacteria on it. Therefore, the comparison of the hydrolytic enzymes and sodium periodate influenced the bacterial adhesion (30 min) and biofilm formation (24 h), and the destruction of the already formed biofilm S. epidermidis occured. According to Congo red agar assay, all tested S. epidermidis strains lacked the ability to produce polysaccharide intercellular adhesion and polymer of N-acetylglucosamine which promotes the biofilm formation on solid surfaces. Adhesion and biofilm formation of all studied strains were strongly inhibited by trypsin (15-52% of control), lysozyme (35-65%), DNase (18-70%) and sodium periodate (17-55%), except S. epidermidis ATCC 29887, the biofilm formation of which was similar to control at the DNase presence. Although the extracellular DNA plays an important role in the bacterial colonization, the addition of the cattle DNA did not affect all stages of biofilm development for all used strains. The preformed biofilm of all studied strains was resistant to the lysozyme and the sodium periodate as their biofilm matrix do not contain the PIA. At the same time, S. epidermidis ATCC 29887 biofilm was destroyed after treatment with trypsin (56±8%) and DNase (63±16%), and S. epidermidis GISK 33 biofilm - after the RNase treatment (70±11%). However, the effect of RNase differed between strains as well as between the moments of its introduction into the medium. Adding RNase simultaneously with inoculum stimulated adhesion of S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 (143±32 %) and inhibited biofilm formation of S. epidermidis ATCC 29887 (63±24 %). Our results show that the relationship between the sensitivity of mature biofilm to the treatment by hydrolytic factors such as enzymes and the influence of these factors on the biofilm formation is not linear. On the contrary, the processes of attachment of bacterial cells and subsequent biofilm formation are directly interdependent.

Download file
Counter downloads: 55

Keywords

DNase, lyzosyme, trypsin, biofilm, adhesion, Staphylococcus epidermidis, ДНКаза, лизоцим, трипсин, биопленки, адгезия, Staphylococcus epidermidis

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Eroshenko Daria V.Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Perm)dasha.eroshenko@gmail.com
Korobov Vladimir P.Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Perm)korobov@iegm.ru
Всего: 2

References

Qin Z., Yang X., Yang L., Jiang J., Ou Y., Molin S., Qu D. Formation and properties of in vitro biofilms of ica-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates // Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2007. Vol. 56. P. 83-93.
Rohde H., Burandt E.C., Siemssen N., Frommelt L., Burdelski C., Wurster S., Scherpe S., Davies A.P., Harris L.G., Horstkotte M.A., Knobloch J.K.M., Ragunath C., Kaplan J.B., Mack D. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections // Biomaterials. 2007. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 1711-1720.
MackD., Davies A.P., Harris L.G., Knobloch J.K.M., Rohde H. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: Functional molecules, relation to virulence, and vaccine potential // Topics in Current Chemistry. 2009. Vol. 288. P. 157-182.
Freeman D.J., Falkiner F.R., Keane C.T. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci // Journal of clinical pathology. 1989. Vol. 42. P. 872-874.
Ерошенко Д.В., Лемкина Л.М., Коробов В.П. Адгезия бактерий Staphylococcus epidermidis 33 при действии некоторых физико-химических факторов среды // Вестник Пермского университета. Биология. 2012. Вып. 1. С. 29-33.
Stepanovic S., Vukovic D., Hola V., Di Bonaventura G., Djukic S., Cirkovic I., Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci // Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. 2007. Vol. 115, № 8. P. 891-899.
Qin Z., Ou Y., YangL., Zhu Y., Tolker-Nielsen T., Molin S., Qu D. Role of autolysin-mediated DNA release in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis // Microbiology. 2007. Vol. 153. P. 2083-2092.
O'Toole G.A., Kaplan H.B., Kolter R. Biofilm formation as microbial development // Annual review of microbiology. 2000. Vol. 54. P. 49-79.
Izano E.A., Amarante M.A., Kher W.B., Kaplan J.B. Differential roles of poly-Nacetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms // Applied and environmental microbiology. 2008. Vol. 74, № 2. P. 470-476.
Дерябин Д.Г. Стафилококки: экология и патогенность. Екатеринбург : УрО РАН, 2000. 239 c.
Gotz F. Staphylococcus and biofilms // Molecular Microbiology. 2002. Vol. 43, №2 6. P. 1367 1378.
 Comparative analysis of PIA-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and destruction under hydrolytic factors | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI:  10.17223/19988591/29/3

Comparative analysis of PIA-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and destruction under hydrolytic factors | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI: 10.17223/19988591/29/3

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1531