Evaluation of polymer-based fluorescent dyes for fish tagging | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI: 10.17223/19988591/29/8

Evaluation of polymer-based fluorescent dyes for fish tagging

The aim of our study was to evaluate small-sized fish tagging by three types of polymers which are the basis for the fluorescent pigment. We examined the efficiency of small-sized fish tagging with acrylic and silicone-based fluorescent dyes. The acrylic tag was blue fluorescent water-dispersion dye. For silicone tag preparation, we mixed compounds with fluorescent pigment and curing agent. The mixture was cured during 72 hours (Pentelast-712) and during 30 minutes (Pentelast-750 FF). Under laboratory conditions we marked Siberian gudgeons Gobio cynocephalus (average body length about 10 cm) with three types of hypodermic tags. The tags were implanted in the pectoral fin by an insulin syringe. We evaluated mortality, growth rate, tag retention and visibility. We showed that injected polymer tags had no influence on the growth rate and surviving comparing with the control group. The visibility of acrylic tags under UV-light was 100% after 134 days, but some tags changed their size and shape. Silicone tag loss was more than 85% on the 44th day of the experiment but the remaining tags were readable during six months. Tissue inflammation in the tag location area disappeared completely in all variations on the 44th day of the experiment. The experimental results allow us to recommend acrylic tags for using in short-term tagging of small-sized fish; silicone - medium-sized and large-sized fish for long-term studies. The process of implanting acrylic tags is technically simpler than silicone. Silicone tags should be implanted in a less mobile body location with the following control of their integrity before fish releasing. The cost of the material used in the work is significantly cheaper than the current commercial product - fluorescent tags (VIE tags) of Northwest Marine Technology company (NMT, USA).

Download file
Counter downloads: 50

Keywords

мечение рыб, имплантация, флуоресцентные метки, акрилаты, силиконы, tagging, tag retention, silicone, acrylate, fluorescent tag, polymer

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Zuev Ivan V.Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk)zuev.sfu@gmail.com
Zueva Anastasiya V.Institute of Biophysics Siberian Branch of RAS (Krasnoyarsk)an.v.zueva@ya.ru
Всего: 2

References

Studenkov S.H., Georgieva M.B., Uzunova E.P., Nikolova M.N., Velkov B. Experimental application of visible elastomer implants for tagging of pumkinseeds (Lepomis gibbosus L.) // Proceeding of the anniversary scientific conference of ecology. Bulgaria. 2008. P. 494-502.
Visible Implant Elastomer Tag Project Manual Guidelines on planning and conducting projects using VIE and associated equipment. Northwest Marine Technology, Inc. 2008. 27 p. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.nmt.us/support/appnotes/ape06.pdf
Catalano M.J., Chipps S.R., Bouchard M.A., WahlD.H. Evaluation of Injectable Fluorescent Tags for Marking Centrarchid Fishes: Retention Rate and Effects on Vulnerability to Predation // North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 2001. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 911-917.
Завьялова Е.А., Дрошнев А.Е., Гулюкин М.И., Калинина Н.Р. Анестезия радужной форели // Российский ветеринарный журнал. Сельскохозяйственные животные. 2012. № 4. С. 22-24.
Javahery S., Nekoubin H., Moradlu A.H. Effect of anesthesia with clove oil in fish (review) // Fish physiol. biochem. 2012. Vol. 38. P. 1545-1552.
Mcllwain T.D., Christmas J.Y. III. A new batch marking technique for fingerling striped bass // The progressive fish-culturist. 1975. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 123-125.
Васильков Г.В., Грищенко Л.И., Енгашев В.Г., Канаев А.И., Ларькова З.И., Осетров В.С. Болезни рыб : справочник / под ред. В.С. Осетрова. М. : Агропромиздат, 1989. 288 с.
Lotrich V.A., Meredith W.H. A technique and the effectiveness of various acrylic colors for subcutaneous marking of fish // Transactions of the American fisheries society. 1974. Vol. 103, № 1. P. 140-142.
Kelly W.H. Marking freshwater and a marine fish by injected dyes // Transactions of the American fisheries society. 1967. Vol. 96, № 2. P. 163-175.
Soula M., Navarro A., Hildebrandt S., Zamorano M.J., Roo J., Heranandez-Cruz M., Afonso J.M. Evaluation of VIE (Visible Implant Elastomer) and PIT (Passive Integrated Transponder) physical tagging systems for the identification of red porgy fingerlings (Pagruspagrus) // Aquacult Int. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 571-583.
Чепуркина М.А. Результаты использования флуоресцентных красителей при мечении осетровых рыб // I Междунар. семинар «Новые технологии в воспроизводстве осетровых рыб». Астрахань, 2005. С. 7-8.
Abdul W.O. Marking and tagging: lecture guide. Abeokuta: University of agriculture, 2011. 21 p.
Frederick J.L. Evaluation of fluorescent elastomer injection as a method for marking small fish // Bulletin of marine science. 1997. Vol. 61, № 2. P. 399-408.
Thorsteinsson V. Tagging methods for stock assessment and research in fisheries. Report of concerted action FAIR CT.96.1394 (CATAG). Reykjavik : Marine research institute technical report (79), 2002. 179 p.
 Evaluation of polymer-based fluorescent dyes for fish tagging | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI: 10.17223/19988591/29/8

Evaluation of polymer-based fluorescent dyes for fish tagging | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 1 (29) . DOI: 10.17223/19988591/29/8

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1531