Trends of lichen distribution in Barnaul (West Siberia, Russia) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 4(32).

Trends of lichen distribution in Barnaul (West Siberia, Russia)

The aim of this work was to update the published data on lichens and to assess trends of lichen distribution in Barnaul. We registered and collected lichens in all plant formations within Barnaul city-line in 2013. All substrates were examined for the presence of lichens; epiphytic lichens were collected from 10 biggest trees of each species found within artificial planting or on 40 x40m plot within native plant formation (a total of 7 native tree species and 18 introduced tree species were examined). We measured lichen species frequency and abundance (projective cover) for epiphytes only (including crustose) on 20x20 cm plots, which had been based on the side with maximal lichen covering on 2 steam levels: near the steam base (up to 0.3 m) and 1.2-1.3 m height. Statistical estimates were assessed with StatSoft STATISTICA for Windows 6.1. Lichen diversity was assessed with Shannon entropy and the measures of inclusion. A total of 151 species of lichens and lichenicolous fungi of 24 families and 58 genera were found within the examined area. Lichen checklist of Barnaul was similar to checklists of other Siberian big cities (up to 80% of similarity). The most of lichen species diversity was found in pine forests and parks and the least lichen species richness and abundance were in artificial planting within living districts. Communities of epiphytic lichens degraded under human impact both in native planting located at a distance from emission sources and in artificial planting near factories and roads. Crustose lichens had the largest percentage in species lists of all plant formations. Fruticose lichens were found in pine forests, mainly. The proportion of mesophytes was maximal in all of localities and the presence of xerophytes depended on artificial substrates within a plant community (mainly concrete or plaster). Deciduous tree bark was the most lichen-covered substrate (up to 84 lichen species) in all studied localities. The most lichen species richness was noted on the bark of the birch (Betula pendula Roth, B. pubescens Ehrh.) and the poplar (Populus balsamifera L.). Lichens on soil (21 species) were found only once within pine forest plot located on a stiff slope of the Barnaulka river normal flood plain terrace (53°18'19.6"N 83°43'13"E). Total of 10 lichen species was found on artificial substrates. Twice these were substrates unusual for lichens: 2 species were investigated on cotton dress material located on soil of the Ob' riverside (53°19'21,6"N 83°48'43"E) and 2 species were found on white-lime covered surface (53°19'29"N 83°47'44,9"E). Epiphytic lichen communities changed under human impact. Parmeliaceae species degraded and were replaced by Physciaceae species. Lichen communities usual for deciduous tree bark with dominating Physcia dubia (Hoffm.) Lettau, Physcia stellaris (L.) Nyl. and codominating Lecania cyrtellina (Nyl.) Sandst, caloplaca cerina (Ehrh. ex Hedw.) Th.Fr., caloplaca holocarpa (Hoffm. ex Ach.) A.E. Wade, candelariella xanthostigma (Ach.) Lettau replaced common for pine lichen communities with dominating Flavopunctelia soredica Hale, Parmelia sulcata Taylor, Hypogymnia physodes (L.) Nyl. and survived on pine stems (Pinus sylvestris L.) in artificial planting. Naetrocymbe punctiformis (Pers.) R.C. Harris was found on pine bark within a single locality in planting along Isakova avenue (53°22'03,6"N 83°40'18,1"E). Lichen species richness and projective cover on a plot had the maximal positive correlations with the height of habitation (from the stem base). The percentage of lichen-free stems had the maximal positive correlation with the traffic of motor vehicles and the maximal negative correlations with the height of carpet plants and dimension of the green zone. Acknowledgments: The reported study was partially supported by the grant RFBR № 14-04-31597-mol_a. The author thanks RE Romanov (the Laboratory of Cryptogamous Plants, Central Siberian Botanical Garden of the SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russia) for assistance in field studies, managers of city parks in Barnaul for permission to collect lichens and researchers of the Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology (Komarov Botanical Institute of the RAS, Saint Petersburg) for consulting and comments.

Download file
Counter downloads: 367

Keywords

лишайники, лихенофлора, таксономическое разнообразие, распространение, лихеносинузии, Западная Сибирь, lichens, lichen flora, taxonomical diversity, distribution, lichen sinusiae, West Siberia

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Romanova Ekaterina V.Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk)korr@ngs.ru
Всего: 1

References

стась Е.Ю., Терехина Т.А. Влияние города Барнаула на состояние эпифитных лишайниковых синузий // Флора и растительность Алтая: Труды Южно-Сибирского ботанического сада. Барнаул, 1999. Т. 4, вып. 1. С. 11-18.
скачко Е.Ю. Лишайники степной и лесостепной зон Алтайского края и их использование для биоиндикации состояния окружающей среды : дис.. канд. биол. наук. Барнаул : Алтайский государственный университет, 2003. 258 с.
Барнаул. Научно-справочный атлас / под ред. В.С. Ревякина. 2-е изд. Новосибирск : ПО Инжгеодезия, 2007. 112 с.
Алтайский край. Предварительная оценка численности населения на 1 января 2014 года и в среднем за 2013 год. URL: http://akstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/ akstat/resources (архивировано из первоисточника: 10.01.2015).
Олькова О.А. Урбанофлора г. Барнаула и его окрестностей // Региональное природопользование и экологический мониторинг. Барнаул, 1996. С. 265-267.
О состоянии и охране окружающей среды Российской Федерации в 2013 году: Государственный доклад Федерального центра геоэкологических систем по заказу Министерства природных ресурсов и экологии Российской Федерации. С. 363. URL: http://www.ecogosdoklad.ru/2013/Default.aspx (архивировано из первоисточника: 10.01.2015).
Определитель лишайников СССР / под ред. И.И. Абрамова. Л., 1971. Вып. 1. 411 с.; 1974. Вып. 2. 283 с.; 1973. Вып. 3. 275 с.; 1977. Вып. 4. 343 с.; 1978. Вып. 5. 304 с.
Определитель лишайников России / под ред. Н.С. Голубковой. СПб. : Наука, 1996. Вып. 6. 202 с.; 1998. Вып. 7. 165 с.; 2003. Вып. 8. 275 с.; 2004. Вып. 9. 338 с.; 2008. Вып. 10. 515 с.
Naesborg R.R. Taxonomic revision of the Lecania cyrtella group based on molecular and morphological evidence // Mycologia. 2008. Vol. 100, № 3. P. 397-416.
Mycobank. URL: www.mycobank.org (дата обращения: 25.12.2014).
Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, 1963. P. 53-54.
Сёмкин Б.И., Орешко А.П., Горшков М.В. Об использовании биоинформационных технологий в сравнительной флористике. II : Меры включения дескриптивных множеств и их использование // Бюллетень БСИ ДВО РАН. 2009. Вып. 4. С. 58-70.
Матерна Я. Воздействие атмосферного загрязнения на природные экосистемы // Загрязнение воздуха и жизнь растений / под ред. М. Трешоу. Л. : Гидрометеоиздат, 1988. С. 436-459.
Van Dobben H.F., Wolterbeek H.Th., Wamelink G.W.W., Ter Braak C.J.F. Relationship between epiphytic lichens, trace elements and gaseous atmospheric pollutants // Environmental Pollution. 2001. Vol. 112, iss. 2. P. 163-169.
Романова Е.В. Лишайники города Кемерово (Западная Сибирь) // Растительный мир Азиатской России. 2011. № 1. С. 9-16.
Романова Е.В., Седельникова Н.В. Лишайники - биоиндикаторы атмосферного загрязнения Новосибирской городской агломерации. Новосибирск : Гео, 2010. 99 с.
Евстигнеева А.С. Материалы к лихенофлоре Республики Татарстан // Фундаментальные исследования. Биологические науки. 2008. № 8. С. 18-24.
Шаяхметова З.М. Лишайники сосновых лесов Предуралья (Пермский край) // Живые и биокосные системы. Электронное периодическое издание ЮФУ 2014. № 6. URL: http://www.jbks.ru/archive/issue-6/article-1 (архивировано из первоисточника: 20.06.2015).
Пауков А.Г., Михайлова И.Н. Лишайники природного парка «Самаровский Чугас» (Тюменская область) // Новости систематики низших растений. 2011. Т. 45. С. 202212.
Малышева Н.В. Лишайники Санкт-Петербурга // Труды Санкт-Петербургского общества естествоиспытателей. Сер. 3. Т. 79. СПб., 2003. 97 с.
Nascimbene J., Salvadori O., Nimis P.L. Monitoring lichen recolonization on a restored calcareous statue // Science of the total environment. 2009. № 407. P. 2420-2426.
Romanova E.V. Lichen Synusiae in Forest and Park Communities of Novosibirsk // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2009. Vol. 2, № 6. P. 1-7.
Романова Е.В. Лишайники - биоиндикаторы атмосферного загрязнения г. Кемерово // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2012. № 4 (20). С. 203204.
 Trends of lichen distribution in Barnaul (West Siberia, Russia) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 4(32).

Trends of lichen distribution in Barnaul (West Siberia, Russia) | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2015. № 4(32).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1795