Crown structure in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) young generative trees. Spatial organization of shoot diversity | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/42/7

Crown structure in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) young generative trees. Spatial organization of shoot diversity

In the 70-80-year-old Siberian stone pine forest in the southeast of Tomsk Region (56°15'N, 84°25'E), the crown structure of young generative Siberian pine trees (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) was studied. Five trees, average in height and DBH, were used to collect branches. The number of the first order branches was counted in each whorl. Then, eight of them, medium in size, were selected for analysis. There were branches from the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th, 30th, 35th and 40th whorls, counting from the top. On these branches, all live shoots of all branching orders were counted. For each of them, the distance from the trunk, as well as the length of the last three annual shoots, was measured. The entire range of shoot diversity was divided into 5 unequal segments: up to 5, 6-11, 12-27, 28-62, and more than 63% of the maximum shoot length for a given tree. In each segment on each tree, 5 shoots were collected. On each of them, the number of stem units, the length of the internodes, and the width of the first xylem ring was determined. It was established that in the crown there is a clear predominance of small, some deficit of very small, and an acute deficit of medium-sized and, especially, large shoots (See Fig. 1). In the direction from the top and from the periphery of the crown, the level of diversity and the average size of shoots decrease, at first, very sharply, then very gradually (See Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Table 1). Concentric domelike crown layers that differ in shoot size and are put into each other only exist if the average size of a shoot is used. As a matter of fact, only the most vigorous shoots in the peripheral part of a crown really form such a dome, which is symmetrical relative to the trunk of the tree. The smaller the size of the shoots, the more they are dispersed throughout the crown volume (See Fig. 4). However, they are located not chaotically, but are organized around the axes of lower order of branching. At the same time, the smaller the size of the shoots is, the higher the organizing value of the axes of lower orders and the more complex the configuration of the space occupied by such shoots are. All the morphological and morphophysiological features that characterize vegetative processes are determined by the size of shoots (the overall level of their growth) (See Table 1). With an increase in the shoot size, the beginning and ending of seasonal periods of morphogenesis and shoot growth move forward, their duration and intensity increase, the metameric structure of the shoot becomes more complicated, and its polar differentiation (acrotonia) increases. Correlations between any vegetative features are always either direct or inverse. The paper contains 4 Figures, 2 Tables and 54 References.

Download file
Counter downloads: 278

Keywords

growth gradient, apical dominance, order of branching, crown structure, Pinus sibirica, shoot system, градиент роста, апикальное доминирование, порядок ветвления, крона, система побегов, Pinus sibirica

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Goroshkevich Sergey N.Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencesgorosh@imces.ru
Всего: 1

References

Цельникер Ю.Л. Радиационный режим под пологом леса. М. : Наука, 1969. 101 c.
Сабинин Д.А. Физиология развития растений. М. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1963. 195 с.
Ford E.D., Avery A., Ford R. Simulation of branch growth in the Pinaceae: interactions of morphology, phenology, foliage productivity and the requirement for structural support, on the export of carbon // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1990. Vol. 146. PP. 15-36.
Cescatti A., Niinemets U. Sunlight capture. Leaf to landscape / Smith W.K., Vogelmann T.C., Chritchley C. eds. Photosynthetic Adaptation of Chloroplast to Landscape. Berlin : Springer Verlag, 2004. PP. 42-85
Horn H.S. The adaptive geometry of trees. Princeton (N.J.) : University press, 1971. 144 p.
Larcher W., Okologie der Pflanzen. Stuttgart : Verlag Eugen Ulmer, 1976. 322 p. In German.
Jensen E.C. The crown structure of a single codominante Douglas-fir. Seattle: University of Washington, WA, 1976. 76 р.
Powell G.R. Shoot and bud development in balsam fir: implications for prunning of Christmas trees // Forest Chronicle. 1982. Vol. 58 (4). PP. 168-172.
Edelin C. Nouvelles donnees sur l'architecture des arbres sympodiaux: le concept de Plan d'organisation // L'arbre biologie et developpement. Actes du 2 Colloque international fur l'arbre Montpellier 1-15 September 1990. Montpellier, 1991. PP. 127-154. In French
Ward W.W. Bud distribution and branching in red oak // Botanical Gazette. 1964. Vol. 125 (3). PP. 217-220.
Wardlaw C.W. Experiments on organogenesis in ferns // Growth. 1949. Vol. 9. PE 93-131.
Мамаев С.А. Формы внутривидовой изменчивости древесных растений. М. : Наука, 1972. 283 с.
Wilson B. F. Tree branshes as populations of twigs // Canadian Journal of Botany. 1989. Vol. 67 (2). PP. 434-442.
Dale J. E. Cell division in leaves // Yeoman M.M., ed. Cell division in higher plants. L. : Academic Press, 1976. PP. 315-345.
Schoute J. C. Beitrage zur Blattstellungslehre // I Die theorie. Recueil des Travaux Botanique Neerlandais. 1913. Bd. 10. SS. 153-339. In German
Sunderland M. Cell division and expansion in the growth of the leaf // Journal of Experimental Botany. 1960. Vol. 11 (31). PP. 148-158.
Zumer M. Knoppsprett hos gran (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) // Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshogskole. 1968. Bd. 47 (10). S. 14-18.
Milthorpe F.L., Newton P. Studies on the expansion of the ieaf surfase. 3. The influence of radiation cell division and leaf expansion // Journal of Experimental Botany. 1960. Vol. 14 (42). PP. 483- 495.
Горошкевич С.Н. Различия в фенологии органогенеза как фактор дифференциации кроны кедра сибирского на генеративные ярусы // Физиология растений. 1993. Т. 40, № 2. С. 278-282.
Owens J.N., Colangeli A.M. Promotion of flowering in western hemlock by gibberellin A4/7 applied at different stages of bud and shoot development // Canadian Journal of Forest Researches. 1989. Vol. 19 (8). PP. 1051-1058.
Powell G.R. Initiation and development of subterminal buds in Abies balsamea // Canadian Journal of Forest Researches. 1977. Vol. 7 (2). PP. 258-262.
Owens J.N., Molder M. Development of long-shoot terminal buds of western white pine (Pinus monticola) // Canadian Journal of Botany. 1977. Vol. 55 (10). PP. 1308-1321.
Kozlowski T.T. Growth characteristics of forest trees // Journal of Forestry. 1963. Vol. 61 (9). PP. 655-662.
Franklin J.F., Ritchie G. A. Phenology of cone and shoot development of Noble fir and some associated true firs // Forest Science. 1970. Vol. 16 (3). PP. 356-364.
Bollman M.P. Sweet G.B. Bud morphogenesis of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. II. The seasonal shoot growth pattern oа seven clones at four sites // New Zealand Journal of Forest Science. 1979. Vol. 9, № 2. PP. 153-165.
Owens J.N., Molder M. Bud development in Sitka spruce. I. Annual growth cycle of vegetative buds and shoots // Canadian Journal of Botany. 1976. Vol. 54 (3-4). PP. 766-779.
Кищенко И.Т. Сезонный рост побегов и хвои сосны в разных частях кроны // Лесоведение. 1983. № 3. С. 27-32.
Owston P.W. Multiple flushing in eastern white pine // Forest Science. 1968. Vol. 14. PP. 66-67.
Елагин И.Н. Применение методов фенологии при изучении динамики роста и развития растений // Лесоведение. 1970. № 1. С. 91-92.
Lanner R.M. Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationship to growth potential // M. G. R. Cannell and F. T. Last, eds. Tree phisiology and yield improvement. L. : Academic Press, 1976. PP. 223-243.
Longuetaud F., Caraglio Y. Pith: a marker of primary growth of in Picea abies (L.) Karst // Trees - Structure and Function. 2009. Vol. 23. PP. 325-334.
Nicolini E., Chanson B., Bonne F. Stem growth and epicormic branch formation in understorey beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) // Annals of Botany (London). 2001. Vol. 87. PP. 737-750.
Guedon Y., Caraglio Y., Heuret P., Lebarbier E., Meredieu U. Analyzing growth components in trees // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2007. Vol. 248. PP. 418-447.
Цельникер Ю. Л. Динамика фотохимической и ферментной систем фотосинтеза в онтогенезе хвои и листа // Рост и газообмен СО2 у лесных деревьев. М. : Наука, 1993. С. 35-55.
Горошкевич С.Н. Структура кроны у молодых генеративных деревьев Pinus sibirica (Pinaceae). Факторы разнообразия побегов // Ботанический журнал. 2008. Т. 93, № 9. С. 1378-1393.
Антонова И.С., Шаровкина М.М. Некоторые особенности строения побеговых систем и кроны молодых генеративных деревьев Tilia platyphyllos Scop. в умеренно-континентальном климате в разных условиях биотопа // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета. Сер. 3. 2011. Вып. 4. С. 52-62.
Антонова И.С., Белова О.А. Трансформация модулей разных уровней кроны некоторых древесных растений в связи с условиями среды и фитоценотической позицией // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Биология и экология. 2008. Вып. 9. С. 10-16.
Антонова И.С., Тертерян Р.А. К вопросу о структурной организации кроны Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) // Ботанический журнал. 2000. Т. 85, № 1. С. 109-123.
Антонова И.С., Тертерян Р.А. Развитие побеговых систем у Pinus sylvestris (Pinaceae) // Ботанический журнал. 1997. Т. 82, № 9. С. 39-53.
Fisher J. B. Tree architecture: relationships between structure and function / R.A. White, W.C. Dickison, eds. Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. New York : Academic Press, 1984. PP. 541-589.
White J. Plant metamerism // R. Dirzo and J. Sarukha'n, eds. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer, 1984. PP. 176-185.
Room P.M., Maillette L., Hanan J.S. Module and metamer dynamics and virtual plants // Advances in Ecological Research. 1994. Vol. 25. PP. 105-157.
Novoplansky A., Cohen D., Sachs T. Ecological implications of correlative inhibition between plant shoots // Physiologia Plantarum. 1989. Vol. 77. PP. 136-140.
Waller D.M. The dynamics of growth and form // Crawley, M.J., ed. Plant Ecology. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Boston, Palo Alto, Melbourne: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1986. PP. 291-320.
Halle F., Oldeman R. A. A., Tomlinson P. B. Tropical trees and forest: an architectural analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg, NY : Springer Verlag, 1978. 442 p.
Kennedy M.C. Functional-structural models optimize the placement of foliage units for multiple whole-canopy functions // Ecological Research. 2010. Vol. 25. PP. 723-732.
Halle F., Oldeman R.A.A. Essai sur l'architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Paris : Masson, 1970. 178 p.
Fourcaud T., Zhang X.-P., Stokes A., Lambers H., Korner C. Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models // Annals of Botany. 2008. Vol. 101 (8). PP. 1053-1063.
Pearcy R.W., Muraoka H., Valladares F. Crown architecture in sun and shade environments: assessing function and tradeoffs with a 3-D simulation model // New Phytologist. 2005. Vol. 166. PP. 791-800.
Sachs T. Self-organization of tree form: a model for complex social systems // Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2004. Vol. 230. PP. 197-202.
Damascos M.A., Prado C.H., Ronquim C.C. Bud composition, branching patterns and leaf phenology in cerrado woody species // Annals of Botany. 2005. Vol. 96. PP. 1075-1084.
Harper J. L. Plant demography and ecological theory // Oicos. 1980. Vol. 35. PP. 224-253.
Oborny B. External and internal control in plant development // Complexity. 2004. Vol. 9. PP. 22-28.
White J. The plant as a metapopulation // Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1979. Vol. 10. PP. 109-145.
 Crown structure in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) young generative trees. Spatial organization of shoot diversity | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2018. №  42. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/42/7

Crown structure in Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) young generative trees. Spatial organization of shoot diversity | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2018. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/42/7

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1805