Ecological condition of small reservoirs of different nature protection status (Samara region)
Currently, the conservation of the unique ecosystems of small water bodies located within cultural landscapes and/or in areas with limited nature protection status is of urgent issue. It is such hydrobiocenoses that are the most susceptible to increasing anthropogenic impact. Phytoplankton is a good indicator of the ecological situation in the reservoir. The aim of the work was to analyze the composition and structure of phytoplankton of some small urbanized lakes of Samara region with different levels of protection and degree of anthropogenic load. Here, this is the first time we present an analysis of the current ecological state of three small water bodies having various nature protection statuses: Lake Yaitskoe (53°10'85"N,50°17'46"E), the regional natural monument; Lake Gatnoe (53°14'93"N, 50°11'83"E), Samara region natural heritage site; and Lake Bolshoe Vasilievskoe (53°54'40"N, 49°53'24"E), the suburban lake located in the transition zone of the Middle Volga complex biosphere reserve (See Table 1). We collected samples for phytoplankton study and basic physical and chemical measurements in the growing season from 2013 to 2014 (See Table 2). We sampled the algae with a Ruttner bathometer. The material was fixed with 40% formalin solution. The cell count was carried out in the chamber “Uchinskaya” (Russia) with a volume of 0.01 ml. This chamber is a glass plate with low sides, the bottom of which is equipped with a special counting grid, optimized for counting plankton. Organisms are counted twice in 20 bands. Species identification of algae and counting of their cells were carried out on the microscope “BIOLAR PI” (limited liability company “Biolar”, Poland) with an increase of 600 times. To determine the species of algae, we used reference guides from the series “Determinants of freshwater algae of the USSR” and “Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa”. The classification of Reynolds and co-authors was used to differentiate phytoplankton into functional groups. S1-type (planktotrichete type) consisted of filamentous non-heterocyst forms of cyanoprokaryotes that previously belonged to genus Oscillatoria, M-type contained representatives of genus Microcystis, H1-type contained representatives of genera Anabaena and Aphanizomenon. The similarity of the algae species composition of lakes was estimated with the Sorensen coefficient (Ks). The level of cenotic diversity and the degree of community alignment were assessed using Shannon (H) and Pielu (E) indices, respectively, taking into account the standard deviation. The dominant species were those whose number and biomass was 10% or more of the total value. The Simpson dominance index (S) was used to estimate the degree of dominance of individual species. Assessment of saprobity of waters was carried out by the method of Pantle and Bucc in the modification of Sladechek, using known indicator values of saprobity of individual species. The general state of ecosystems of the studied lakes was analyzed on the basis of the qualitative composition and quantitative development of phytoplankton from 2013 to 2014. In all lakes, the species richness of phytoplankton was quite high and contributed mainly by chlorophytes, diatoms and cyanoprokaryota species (See Table 3 and Fig. 1). Floristic analysis revealed signs of imbalance in lake ecosystems, probably caused by anthropogenic impact and/or lack of biogenic limitation (See Table 4). This situation is especially unfavorable for ecosystems of water bodies of protected nature areas. Ecological and geographical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the algal flora of the studied reservoirs (See Table 5). The level of similarity of the species composition of the studied reservoirs was quite high (See Table 6). Perhaps this was due not only to similar abiotic parameters of the environment, but also to a high level of identical anthropogenic load. Quantitative phytoplankton development was high in all water bodies, the highest one was observed in Lake Bolshoe Vasilievskoe, and the lowest in lake Gatnoe (See Fig. 3). According to average algal biomass over the study period, Lake Bolshoe Vasilievskoe corresponds to the hypertrophic state, while lakes Gatnoe and Yaitskoe are eutrophic. Phytoplankton species diversity and alignment were highest in lake Gatnoe, and smallest in lake Yaitskoe. According to saprobity, the studied water bodies were β-mezosaprobic which corresponds to the water quality class III. Analysis of the floristic composition, the ratio of taxonomic ranks, indicators of quantitative development and the structure of the dominant species complex revealed signs of an imbalance in ecosystems and the development of “oscillatory” disease in all studied lakes, regardless of their conservation status due to anthropogenic impact and lack of biogenic restriction. The paper contains 3 Figures, 6 Tables and 38 References. The Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords
фитопланктон,
таксономический состав,
видовое разнообразие,
качество воды,
эвтрофирование,
phytoplankton,
taxonomic composition,
species diversity,
water quality,
eutrophicationAuthors
Krivina Elena S. | Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences | pepelisa@yandex.ru |
Malysheva Anna A. | Main Basin Directorate for Fishery and Conservation of Aquatic Biological Resources | malysheva.anna.83@mail.ru |
Tarasova Natalia G. | Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Togliatti State University | |
Tretyakova Tatyana P. | Togliatti State University | tret_tatyana@inbox.ru |
Umanskaya Marina V. | Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences | mvumansk67@gmail.com |
Всего: 5
References
Barinova S., Gabyshev V., Boboev M., Kukhaleishvili L., Bilous O. Algal indication of climatic gradients // American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2015. Vol. 4 (3-1). PP. 72-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.s.2015040301.22
Liu J., Kattel G., Arp H.P.H., Yang H. Towards threshold-based management of freshwater ecosystems in the context of climate change // Ecological Modelling. 2015. № 318. PP. 265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.09.010
Chernova E., Russkikh I., Voyakina E., Sidelev S., Babanazarova O., Romanov R., Kotovshchikov A., Mazur-Marzec H. Dolichospermum and Aphanizomenon as neurotoxins producers in some Russian freshwaters // Toxicon. 2017. Vol. 130. PP. 47-55. doi: 10.1016/j. toxicon.2017.02.016
Babanazarova O.V., Sidelev S.I., Aleksandrina E.M., Sakharova E.G., Kurmayer R. Phytoplankton structure and microcystine concentration in the highly eutrophic Nero Lake // Water Resources. 2011. Vol. 38, № 2. PP. 229-236. doi: 10.1134/S0097807811020023
Barinova S., Krupa E., Tsoy V., Ponamareva L. The application of phytoplankton in ecological assessment of the Balkhash lake (Kazakhstan) // Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2018. Vol. 16, № 3. PP. 2089-2111. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1603_20892111
Sakharova E.G., Korneva L.G. Phytoplankton in the littoral and pelagial zones of the Rybinsk Reservoir in years with different temperature and water level regimes // Inland Water Biology. 2018.Vol. 11 (1). PP. 6-12. doi: 10.1134/S1995082918010157
Komulaynen S. Algal protection, conservation areas and Red Data Book of the Republik of Karelia // Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies. 2010. Vol. 39 (2). PP. 147-152. doi: 10.2478/v10009-010-0028-2
Snit'ko L.V., Snit'ko V.P. Phytoplankton as an indicator in assessing long-term variations in water quality of lakes Bolshoye Miassovo and Turgoyak, the South Urals // Water Resources. 2014. Vol. 41, № 2. PP. 210-217. doi: 10.1134/S0097807814020146
Korneva L.G. Changes in phytoplankton diversity in the Volga basin waterbodies // Inland Water Biology. 2010. Vol. 3(4). PP. 322-328. doi: 10.1134/S1995082910040048
Голубая книга Самарской области: редкие и охраняемые гидробиоценозы / ред. Г.С. Розенберг, С.В. Саксонов. Самара : СамНЦ РАН, 2006. 200 с.
Протисты и бактерии озер Самарской области / ред. В.В. Жариков. Тольятти : Кассандра, 2009. 240 с.
Gelashvili D.B., Iudin D.I., Yakimov V.N., Solntsev L.A., Shurganova G.V., Okhapkin A.G., Startseva N.A., Pukhnarevich D.A., Snegireva M.S., Rozenberg G.S. Multifractal analysis of the species structure of freshwater hydrobiocenoses // Biology Bulletin. 2012. Vol. 39, № 3. PP. 271-278. doi: 10.1134/S1062359012010037
Корнева Л.Г. Фитопланктон водохранилищ бассейна Волги. Кострома : Костромской печатный дом, 2015. 284 с.
Трифонова И.С. Экология и сукцессия озерного фитопланктона. Л. : Наука, 1990. 183 с.
Митрошенкова А.Е., Ясюк В.П. Современное состояние экосистемы Яицких озер левобережной поймы реки Самары // Научный диалог. 2014. №1(25). С. 115-128.
Кривина Е.С., Тарасова Н.Г. Трансформация альгофлоры техногенных озер (на примере г. Тольятти) // Вода и экология: проблемы и решения. 2017. № 3(17). С. 203-209. doi: 10.23968/2305-3488.2017.21.3.13-34
Китаев С.П. Основы лимнологии для гидробиологов и ихтиологов. Петрозаводск : Карельский науч. центр Российской акад. наук, Ин-т биологии, 2007. 394 с.
Методика изучения биогеоценозов внутренних водоемов / под ред. Ф.Д. Мордухай-Болтовского. М.: Наука, 1975. 240 с.
Lund J.W.G., Kipling C., Le Cren E.O. The inverted microscope method ofestimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting // Hydrobiology. 1958. Vol. 11. PP. 143-170. doi: 10.1007/BF00007865
Вассер С.П., Кондратьева Н.В., Масюк Н.П., Паламарь-Мордвинцева Г.М., Ветрова З.И., Кордюм Е.Л., Мошкова Н.А., Приходькова Л.П., Коваленко О.В., Ступина В.В., Царенко П.М., Юнгер В.П., Радченко М.И., Виноградова О.Н., Бухтиярова Л.Н., Разумна Л.Ф. Водоросли : справочник. Киев : Наукова думка, 1989. 608 с.
Дедусенко-Щеголева Н.Т., Матвиенко А.М., Шкорбатов Л.А. Зеленые водоросли. Класс Вольвоксовые. Chlorophyta: Volvocineae // Определитель пресноводных водорослей СССР. М. ; Л. : Наука, 1959. Вып. 8. 223 с.
Дедусенко-Щеголева Н.Т., Голлербах М.М. Желтозеленые водоросли // Определитель пресноводных водорослей СССР. М. ; Л. : Наука, 1962. Вып. 5. 272 с.
Царенко П.М. Краткий определитель хлорококковых водорослей Украинской ССР / АН УССР. Ин-т ботаники им. Н.Г. Холодного ; отв. ред. Г.М. Паламарь-Мордвинцева. Киев : Наукова думка, 1990. 208 с.
Komarek J., Anagnostidis K. Cyanoprokaryota. Teil 1: Chroococcales // Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Jena ; Stuttgart ; Lubeck ; Ulm, 1998. Bd. 19/1. 548 p.
Komarek J., Anagnostidis K. Cyanoprokaryota. Teil 2: Oscillatoriales // Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Munchen, 2005. Bd. 19/2. 759 p.
Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 1: Naviculaceae // Die Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Stuttgart ; New York : Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1986. Bd. 2/1. 876 p.
Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. Bacillariophyceae. Teil 3: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae // Die Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Stuttgart ; Jena : Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1991. Bd. 2/3. 576 p.
Reynolds C.S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L., Melo S.Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton // Journal of Plankton Research. 2002. 24. PP. 417-428. doi: 10.1093/plankt/24.5.417
Мегурран Е. Экологическое разнообразие и его измерение. М. : Мир, 1992. 184 с.
Sladecek V System of water quality from the biological point of view // Ergebnisse der Limnologie. 1973. Bd. 7. P. 1-218.
Wegl R. Index fur die Limnosaprobitat // Wasser und Abwasser. 1983. Bd. 26. PP. 1-175.
Barinova S.S., Klochenko P.D., Belous Y.P. Algae as indicators of the ecological state of water bodies: methods and prospects // Hydrobiological Journal. 2015. Vol. 51 (6). PP. 3-21. doi: 10.1615/HydrobJ.v51.i6.10
Горохова О.Г. Водоросли планктона малых водоемов юга лесостепного Поволжья (количественная характеристика фитопланктона) // Известия Самарского научного центра РАН. 2017. Т. 19 (5). С. 192-199.
Яценко-Степанова Т.Н. Оценка экологического состояния некоторых озер поймы реки Урал в Оренбургской области // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2017. № 11 (211). С. 125-128.
Горохова О.Г., Паутова В.Н. Водоросли планктона малых водоёмов юга лесостепного Поволжья (альгофлора: сравнительная характеристика озёр по составу планктона) // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2015. Т. 17, № 4. С. 194-202.
Okhapkin A.G., Scharagina E.M., Vodeneeva E.L., Genkal S.I. Structure and dynamics of phytoplankton in the kOka river mouth at the beginning of the 21th century // Inland Water Biology. 2014. Vol. 7 (4). PP. 357-365. doi: 10.1134/S1995082914040142
Barinova S. The effect of altitude on distribution of freshwater algae in continental Israel // Current Topic of Plant Biology. 2011. Vol. 4. PP. 89-95.
Дрозденко Т.В., Михалап С.Г. Структурно-таксономическое разнообразие и экологические особенности фитопланктона дельты реки Великой (Псковская область) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2018. № 41. С. 118-134. doi: 10.17223/19988591/41/7