Using marginal species localities for the revision of the western boundary of the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2021. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/55/1

Using marginal species localities for the revision of the western boundary of the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province

Floristic regionalization is a necessary stage of the investigation of plant taxa distribution. The result of floristic regionalization is a scheme of geographic units (phytochoria), which differ by composition and structure of their floras. There are several approaches to distinguish phytochoria and their boundaries: by geographical features of the investigated territory; by vegetation and taking into account the relief of the territory; by endemic taxa; by comparing the floras of the key territories; by concentration of range boundaries and by lines of the range boundaries coincidence. For drawing phytochoria boundaries, this paper proposes to use the westernmost and the easternmost species localities on dot distribution maps and clusters of these localities rather than ranges and concentrations of range boundaries. The research specifies the western boundary of the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province (WbAYP). Published dot distribution maps of 2569 vascular plant species and subspecies of Siberian flora were used to reveal marginal western and eastern localities. They were geocoded by means of Geographic Information System ArcView GIS 3.2a (registration number is 843181116338) and the module ArcView Spatial Analyst 2.0a (registration number is 849601104159). The coordinates of geocoded localities and supplementary data (taxon name, numbers of map and locality) were entered into the Localities Database tables in MS Access (DBLoc). The total number of entries in the database tables was 169854. The marginal western and eastern localities in the limits of 49°-62°N and 80°-100°E were selected for each species/subspecies from the DBLoc. The latitudinal extent of the frame corresponds to the latitudinal length of the WbAYP, and the longitudinal extent corresponds to the distance of approximately 10° to the west and to the east from the border. Selection of the marginal localities was made by means of computer programmes written by the author in the Visual Basic for Applications. At this stage, the Marginal Localities Database was made (DBMarLoc), which comprised data on 1654 dots. Then, for more detailed consideration of the southern, central and northern parts of the boundary, data corresponding to the localities from smaller overlapping frames along the boundary were selected (See Fig. 1). GIS NextGIS QGIS was used to visualize some floristic boundaries in Asiatic Russia. The R free software environment for statistical computing and graphics was used to visualize marginal localities inside the selected frames, as well as to test their patterns against Complete Spatial Randomness (CSR) hypothesis. CSR hypothesis was tested by x2 test (quadrat.test function in spatstat package in R). Southern part of WbAYP. Testing CSR hypothesis for marginal localities in frame 1 (827 dots, a grid of 10x4 squares with side of 1°) (See Fig. 2) gives thep-value less than 2.2e-16, that is less than 0.001 and allows us to reject the null hypothesis of complete spatial randomness of the distribution of dots in the frame. The deviation from the random distribution of marginal localities is manifested in their accumulation in the southwestern part of the frame, corresponding to the Altai Mountains. The dot cluster extends beyond the westernmost point of the Altai-Yenisei Province at 84°E. There, at the Tigerekskiy Ridge, there are the westernmost Siberian localities of Schulzia crinita (Pall.) Spreng., Lloydia serotina (L.) Rchb., Salix vestita Pursh, Minuartia biflora (L.) Schinz et Thell., Smelowskia calycina (Stephan) C.A. Mey., Saxifraga terektensis Bunge, Sibbaldiaprocumbens L., Hedysarum theinum Krasnob., and Doronicum altaicum Pall. Obviously, the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province should include the Western Altai Mountains of Altai Krai and the province boundary shoud be located more to the west than that drawn earlier. Central part of WbAYP. Testing CSR hypothesis for marginal localities in frame 2 (52 dots, a grid of 6x4 squares with side of 1°) gives the p-value 0.045, that is less than 0.05 and does not allow us to accept the null hypothesis of complete spatial randomness of the distribution of dots in the frame. However, attention is drawn to the closeness of the p-value to the threshold level, the excess of which would allow accepting the random distribution of dots in the frame. Testing CSR hypothesis for marginal localities in frame 3 (128 dots, a grid of 4x6 squares with side of 1°) gives the p-value of 6.237e-10, that is less than 0.001 and allows us to reject the null hypothesis of complete spatial randomness. The cluster of marginal localities in coordinates 52°-53°N and 89°-90°E corresponds to the Abakan Ridge and ridges of smaller scale at the junction of the Abakan Ridge and the Western Sayan Ridge at the southern part of the Republic of Khakassia. There, the marginal localities of Aconitum biflorum Fisch. ex DC., Oxytropis kusnetzovii Krylov et Steinb., and Conioselinum longifolium Turcz are found. The cluster of dots in coordinates 54°-56°N and 89°-91°E corresponds to the northern part of the Republic of Khakassia with its western boundary approximately along the meridian 89°E by the slopes of the Kuznetsk Alatau Ridge. The marginal western localities are found there of Salix saxatilis Turcz. ex Ledeb., Betula divaricata Ledeb., Veronica alpina L. s. str. Apparently, WbAYP in its central part should be delineated approximately along the 89°E meridian. Northern part of WbAYEP. Testing CSR hypothesis for marginal localities in frame 4 (56 dots, a grid of 15x5 squares with side of 1°) gives the p-value of 0.11, that is more than 0.05 and allows us to accept the null hypothesis of complete dot spatial randomness in the frame. Comparatively small number of marginal dots and their random distribution does not allow us to outline floristic boundary by marginal localities in this region. Nevertheless it is noteworthy that some marginal localities tend to the Ob’ and Yenisei Rivers and their tributaires. Apparently, the northern part of the WbAYP should be drawn according to the geographical principle by the Yenisei River, which flow among plain and mountain territories: the Yenisei and Ketsko-Tumskaya plains to the west of the river, the Yenisei Ridge and Zaangar Plateau to the east of it. For example, the marginal western localities of Lilium pensylvanicum Ker-Gawl., Filipendula palmata (Pall.) Maxim. and Chrysanthemum zawadskii Herbrich subsp. peleiolepis (Trautv.) Zuev. are marked for specified meridional interval to the east of the Yenisei River. The paper contains 2 Figure and 27 References

Download file
Counter downloads: 138

Keywords

floristic regionalization, dot distribution maps, geocoding, Siberia, Asiatic Russia

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Artemov Igor’ A.Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencesartemov_1@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Комаров В.Л. Предисловие // Флора СССР. Т 1 / под. ред. М.М. Ильина. Л. : Изд-во АН СССР, 1934. С. 1-12.
Горчаковский П.Л., Никонова Н.Н., Фамелис Т.В. Растительность и ботаникогеографическое деление территории // Определитель сосудистых растений Среднего Урала / под ред. П.Л. Горчаковского. М. : Наука, 1994. С. 6-12.
Определитель растений Республики Тывы / И.М. Красноборов и др. ; под ред. Д.Н. Шауло. Новосибирск : Изд-во СО РАН, 2007. 706 с.
Takhtajan A. Floristic Regions of the World. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1986. 522 p.
Liu Z.-W., Peng H. Notes on the key role of stenochoric endemic plants in the floristic regionalization of Yunnan // Plant Diversity. 2016. № 38 (6). PP. 289-294. doi: 10.1016/j. pld.2016.11.011
Ревушкин А.С. Высокогорная флора Алтая. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1988. 320 с.
Малышев Л.И., Байков К.С., Доронькин В.М. Флористическое деление Азиатской России на основе количественных признаков // Krylovia. 2000. Т. 2, № 1. С. 3-16.
Bom J., Linder H.P., Desmet P. The Greater Cape Floristic Region // Journal of Biogeography. 2007. № 34 (1). PP. 147-162. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01595.x
Bannister J.R., Vidal O.J., Teneb E., Sandoval V Latitudinal patterns and regionalization of plant diversity along a 4270-km gradient in continental Chile // Austral Ecology. 2012. № 37. PP. 500-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02312.x
Jung S., Cho Y-C. Redefining floristic zones in the Korean Peninsula using high-resolution georeferenced specimen data and self-organizing maps // Ecology and Evolution. 2020. № 10 (20). PP. 11549-11564. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6790
Бубырева В.А. Флористическое районирование северного макросклона Русской равнины на основе сгущений границ ареалов // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Биология. 2004. Серия 3. Вып. 1. С. 35-68.
Баранова О.Г Предварительное флористическое районирование Удмуртской Республики // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Биология. Науки о земле. 2016. Т 26, вып. 2. С. 27-34.
Разумовский С.М. О границах ареалов и флористических линиях // Бюллетень Главного ботанического сада. 1969. Вып. 72. С. 20-28.
Разумовский С.М. Флористическое районирование по ключевым местностям // Разумовский С.М. Труды по экологии и биогеографии (полное собрание сочинений). М. : Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2011. С. 482-483.
Ревушкин А.С. Материалы к флористическому районированию Алтае-Саянской провинции // Флора, растительность и растительные ресурсы Сибири. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1987. С. 32-46.
Конспект флоры Азиатской России: Сосудистые растения / Л.И. Малышев [и др.]; под ред. К.С. Байкова. Новосибирск : Изд-во СО РАН, 2012. 640 с.
Толмачев А.И. Основы учения об ареалах (Введение в хорологию растений). Л. : Изд-во ЛГУ, 1962. 100 с.
Burgman M.A., Fox J.C. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning // Animal Conservation. 2003. № 6. PP. 19-28. doi: 10.1017/S1367943003003044
Флора Сибири. Новосибирск, 1987-1997. T. 1-13.
Artemov I., Egorova A. Locations of plants on dot distribution maps in the Flora of Siberia (Flora Sibiraea, 1987-1997). Version 1.2. Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS. Occurrence dataset. 2021. doi: 10.15468/jb84wg
Харитонова И., Вольман Н. Программирование в Access 2002 : учебный курс. СПб. : Питер, 2003. 480 с.
Gunderloy M., Harkins S.S. Automating Microsoft Access with VBA. Indianopolis : Que, 2004. 384 p.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, 2020. URL: https://www.R-project.org/(дата обращения: 12.01.2021).
Савельев А.А., Мухарамова С.С., Чижикова Н.А., Пилюгин А.Г Теория пространственных точечных процессов в задачах экологии и природопользования (с применением пакета R) : учеб. пособие. Казань : Изд-во Казан. ун-та, 2014. 146 с.
Определитель растений Алтайского края / под. ред. И.М. Красноборова. Новосибирск : Изд-во СО РАН, филиал «Гео», 2003. 634 с.
Крылов П.Н. Очерк растительности Сибири. Томск, 1919. 24 с.
Лащинский Н.Н., Лащинская Н.В. Высшие сосудистые растения // Флора Салаирского кряжа / отв. ред. Н.Н. Лащинский. Новосибирск : Академическое изд-во «Гео», 2007. С. 155-251.
 Using marginal species localities for the revision of the western boundary of the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2021. №  55. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/55/1

Using marginal species localities for the revision of the western boundary of the Altai-Yenisei floristic Province | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2021. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/55/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 194