Andromonoecy and Floral Protandry of Oenanthe aquatica (Apiaceae)
The paper studies the synflorescence structure and flowering biology of the biennial monocarpic wetland plant Oenanthe aquatica. This species has a set of adaptations to prevent self-pollination, including generation of a pseudanthium, andromonoecy, intra- and interfloral protandry, and a specific sequence of flowering within its umbels. The synflorescence of O. aquatica is a panicle of umbels. The size of perfect and male flowers consistently decreases as the order of synflorescence axes grows. The size-related differences between perfect and staminate flowers on axes of the same branching order consist only in the length of their calyx abaxial teeth, corolla diameter, width of abaxial petals, length and width of anthers, and length and height of stylopodium. We have identified two arrangements of staminate flowers in O. aquatica: male flowers are located at the periphery or in the center of the umbellets. The share of staminate flowers in umbels increases as an axis order grows. The female phase of flowers on axes of one order occurs simultaneously within entire synflorescences with the male phase of flowers on axes of the next order, which might mean geitonogamy. Perfect flowers live for five to seven days, while staminate flowers function for no more than one day. The article contains 4 Figures, 2 Tables, 32 References. The Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords
protandry,
flowering sequence,
andromonoecy,
synflorescence structure,
Oenanthe aquaticaAuthors
Godin Vladimir N. | Moscow Pedagogical State University; Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences | godinvn@yandex.ru |
Arkhipova Tatyana V. | Moscow Pedagogical State University | tata50509@mail.ru |
Vetlova Maria A. | Moscow Pedagogical State University | mashoktime@mail.ru |
Kuranova Natalia G. | Moscow Pedagogical State University | nkuranova@inbox.ru |
Всего: 4
References
Ajani Y., Bull-Hereñu K., Claßen-Bockhoff R. Patterns of flower development in Apiaceae-Apioideae. Flora. 2016;221:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.02.004
Sun S., Verdú M. Evolutionary correlation of heterodichogamy and floral longevity. Evolutionary Ecology. 2016;30(6):1023-1030. doi: 10.1007/s10682-016-9865-0
Schulz A. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Bestaubungseinrichtungen und Geschlechtsverteilung bei den Pflanzen. Bibliotheca Botanica. 1890;3(17):1-224. In German
Nuraliev M.S., Sokoloff D.D., Karpunina P.V., Oskolski A.A. Patterns of Diversity of Floral Symmetry in Angiosperms: A Case Study of the Order Apiales. Symmetry. 2019;11(4);473. doi: 10.3390/sym11040473
Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co; 2012. 937 p.
Robinsohn I. Die Färbungsreaktion der Narbe, Stigmatochromie, als morpho-biologische Blütenuntersuchungsmethode. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse. 1924;133:181-211. In German
Hegi G. Ilustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa. Bd. 5, T. 1. Munchen: J.F. Lehmann Verlag; 1926. 1562 S. In German
Troll W. Die Infloreszenzen: Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. I. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag; 1964. 615 S. In German
Petrova S.E., Barykina R.P. Plasticity of Oenanthe aquatica (L.) Poir. life form in the semiwater conditions. Byulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody. Otdel Biologicheskii. 2010;115(5):43-49 In Russian, English Summary
Plunkett G.M., Pimenov M.G., Reduron J.P., Kljukov E.V., van Wyk B.E., Ostroumova T.A., Henwood M.J., Tilney P.M., Spalik K., Watson M.F., Lee B.Y., Pu F.D., Webb C.J., Hart J.M., Mitchell A.D., Muckensturm B. Apiaceae. In: Kadereit J., Bittrich V., editors. Flowering Plants. Eudicots. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Vol. 15. Springer, Cham; 2018. pp. 9-206. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93605-5_2
Cruden R.W. Temporal dioecism: systematic breadth, associated traits, and temporal patterns. Botanical Gazette. 1988;149(1): 1-15. doi: 10.1086/337684
Endress P.K. Structural and temporal modes of heterodichogamy and similar patterns across angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 2020; 193( 1 ):5-18. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa001
Koul P., Sharma N., Koul A.K. Pollination biology of Apiaceae. Current Science. 1993;65(3):219-222.
Demyanova E.I. In addition to the study of anthecology and sexual polymorphism in Apiaceae of forest-steppe Zauralie. I. About proterandry in Apiaceae. Bulletin of Perm University. Biology. 2000;2:53-57. In Russian, English Summary
Ponomarev A.N. Concerning protandry in Umbelliferae. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 1960;135(3):750-752.
Schmitz T., Claßen-Bockhoff R. Patterns of sex distribution in andromonoecious Apiaceae-Apioideae. In: 15. Internationales Symposium Biodiversität & Evolutionsbiologie. Bochum, 2001. 90. In German
Godin V.N., Dozorova S.V., Arkhipova T.V. Andromonoecy of Aegopodium podagraria (Apiaceae) in Moscow region. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2019;45:47-68. doi: 10.17223/19988591/ 45/3 In Russian, English Summary
Godin V.N. Analysis of sexual polymorphism of the plant from subclass Rosidae in Siberia. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2012;5(3):337-342. doi: 10.1134/S1995425512030067
Godin V.N. Sexual forms and their ecological correlates of flowering plants in Siberia Russian Journal of Ecology. 2017;48(5):433-439. doi: 10.1134/S1067413617050058
Godin V.N., Perkova T.V. Flowering biology and sexual polymorphism in the Apiaceae species (Moscow region). Botanicheskiy Zhurnal = Botanical Journal. 2017;102(1):35-47. doi: 10.1134/S0006813617010033 In Russian, English Summary
Froebe H.A., Ulrich G. Pseudanthien bei Umbelliferen. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen. 1978;54(2):175-206. In German, English Summary
Schlessman M.A. Major events in the evolution of sexual systems in Apiales: ancestral andromonoecy abandoned. Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010;128(1-2):233-245. doi: 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0011
Lloyd D.G., Webb C.J. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 1986;24(1): 135-162. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1986.10409725
Kusnetzova T.V. Angiosperm inflorescences and different types of their structural organization. Flora. 1988;181(1-2):1-17. doi: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30344-4
Webb C.J. Andromonoecism, protandry, and sexual selection in Umbelliferae. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 1981;19(4):335-338. doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1981.10426389
Bell C.R. Breeding systems and floral biology of the Umbelliferae, or evidence for specialization in unspecialized flowers. In: The Biology and Chemistry of the Umbelliferae. Heywood V.H., editor. 1971:93-108.
Lindsey A.H. Floral phenology patterns and breeding systems in Thaspium and Zizia (Apiaceae). Systematic Botany. 1982;7(1):1-12. doi: 10.2307/2418648
Knuth P. Handbuch der Blutenbiologie. Bd II, T. I. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann;1898. 696 S. In German
Keighery G.J. Reproductive strategies of Western Australian Apiaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1982;140(4):243-250. doi: 10.1007/BF02418895
Reuther K., Claßen-Bockhoff R. Diversity behind uniformity - inflorescence architecture and flowering sequence in Apiaceae-Apioideae. Plant Diversity and Evolution. 2010;128(1-2):181-220. doi: 10.1127/1869-6155/2010/0128-0009
Harder L.D., Jordan C.Y., Gross W.E., Routley M.B. Beyond floricentrism: The pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology. 2004;19(3):137-148. doi: 10.1111/j. 1442-1984.2004.00110.x
Barrett S.C.H. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003;358(1434):991-1004. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1301