Breeding biology of the great tit Parus major (L., 1758) in the south-east of Western Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2023. № 64. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/64/7

Breeding biology of the great tit Parus major (L., 1758) in the south-east of Western Siberia

We analyzed the results of long-term studies (1983-2019) of breeding biology of the great tit (Parus major) in the sub-taiga forest subzone of the south-eastern part of Western Siberia. Data were collected in the surroundings of Tomsk (56°28'N, 84°54'E, 90-100 m a.s.l.), the village Kireyevsk (Tomsk oblast, 56°22'N. 84°05'E, 90 m a.s.l.) and the village Lomachevka (Kemerovo oblast, 56°08N, 86°50'E, 190 m a.s.l.). In total we examined 297 nests, 2194 eggs were measured. Nest-boxes were placed in deciduous (aspen-birch and birch), mixed (pine-birch-aspen) and coniferous (pine and Siberian pine) forests. The density of nest-boxes in all types of forests was 107/10 ha. Nest-box occupation average rate was 4.3% and population average density was 4.7 pairs /10 ha. In deciduous forests tits occupied nest-boxes more often (6.3%) than in mixed (3.6%). and coniferous forests (4.0%). The mean long-term date of the earliest egg laying was May 3 (20 April-14 May); the median laying date was May 12. A long-term advancement of laying dates was revealed (r = - 0.54, p < 0.05). That was consistent with a significant trend to warming in April (r = 0.63, p < 0.05). The dependence of date of earliest egg laying (y) on year (x) is described by linear regression equation: y = 574. 6 - 0,27x (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.01, n = 27). Thus, the annual shift in the beginning of egg laying averaged 0.3 days. Full clutches started no later than 30 days from the date of appearance of the first egg in the season contained 7-16 eggs. The mean clutch size is 11.92 ± 0.12 eggs (n = 202) (See Table 1). The clutch size decreases in the row (line): mixed (12.59 ± 0.15) - coniferous (11.77 ± 0.22) - deciduous forests (11.15±0.23). In all comparison pairs the differences are statistically significant (See Table 2). The clutch size decreased along breeding season and amounts to 0.62 eggs per decade. The dependence of the clutch size (y) on the date of appearance of the first egg (x) is described by the linear regression equation: y = 12.41 - 0.062 • x (R2 = 0.28,p < 0.001). The mean length of eggs (L) 18.60 ± 0.02 mm, the maximum diameter of eggs (B) 13.83 ± 0.01 mm. The volume of eggs calculated from the formula: V = 0.51 TB2 [18] was 1747 ± 3 (1234-2151) mm3. The egg sphericity index (shape index) calculated from the formula: S = (B/L) 100 [19] is 76.21 ± 0.02 (65.50-84.42) %, CV=3.83%. The volume of eggs and the index are negatively correlated (r = - 0.15, p < 0.05), so there is a weak but statistically significant tendency to increase the sphericity index of eggs with a decrease in their volume. The volume of eggs in contrast to the size of the clutch is maximum in deciduous forests and decreases in the row (line): deciduous (1761 ± 6 mm3) -coniferous (1750 ± 7 mm3) - mixed forests (1740 ± 4 mm3). In pair deciduous - mixed forests the differences are statistically significant (p < 0.01) (See Table 2). 12.2% females laid second clutches after a successful first breeding cycle. This is noticeably less compared to European populations of the species located at latitude similar to the study area: 28.1% at Ryazan region [6] and 63.4% at Moscow region [7]. The share (proportion) of successful nests where, at least, one young fledged in first, replacement and second clutches is 67.7%. From 2407 eggs, 1773 chicks (nestlings) hatched and 1519 fledglings flew out. The success of incubation is 73.7%, (hatched chicks /eggs in nests where at least one egg was laid), feeding (fledglings / hatched chicks) - 85.7%, breeding (fledglings / eggs in nests where at least one egg was laid) - 63.1%. Predators ravaged 16.0% of nests, in which they destroyed 10.3% of eggs and 4.2% of chicks. 12.1% of nests were abandoned; losses were 6.8% of eggs and 2.1% of nestlings. The wrynecks (Jynx torquilla) threw out 4.3% of the nests; losses were 3.0% of the eggs. Embryonic mortality in nests survived to hatching was 7.9%, partial mortality of nestlings was 8.0% of total number of hatched nestlings. Reproductive success in successful nests (first, replacement and second clutches) was 84.1%, the embryonic mortality -7.9%, and the partial mortality of chicks - 8,3%. The maximum breeding success is observed in mixed forests (66.9%), the minimum is in deciduous forests (55.9%), and the value of the index in coniferous forests is an intermediate values (62.2%). The mean number of fledglings in first, replacement and second clutches per successful attempt and breeding attempt are 10.03 ± 0.18 and 6.77 ± 0.35, respectively. The maximum brood size is observed in mixed forests (10.54 ± 0.22), the minimum is in a deciduous one (9.06 ± 0.36), and the value of the index in coniferous forests is an intermediate values (9.89 ± 0.40). A similar trend is observed in respect to the number of chicks per breeding attempt: mixed forests (7.85 ± 0.48), deciduous forests (5.09 ± 0.60), and coniferous forests (6.68 ± 0.79) (See Table 3, 4). In the European part of the great tit's range, in the latitude range of 55-60° N close to our study area clutch size (first breeding cycle) varies in limits 8.20-11.64 eggs [6, 25, 35, 37-44] and according to our calculations the average is 9.69 ± 0.18 eggs, which is significantly less than in Western Siberia (11.92 ± 0.12 eggs) (p < 0.001). The mean egg volume in European population in latitude range of 55-60° N varies in limits 16541712 mm3 [41, 43, 46-48] (n = 9), and according to our calculations the average is 1675 ± 7 mm3, which also is significantly less than in Western Siberia. The overall breeding success in first, replacement and second nests (fledglings / eggs in nests where, at least, one egg was laid) in the latitude range 50°-67° N in Europe varies in limits 41.6-73.9% [6, 8, 25, 43, 44, 50-56]. According to our calculations this index the average is 62. 0% (n = 20), which almost coincides with our data for Western Siberia (63. 1%). In Europe, in the latitude range of 55-60° N the brood size in first breeding cycle varies in limits 6.81-10.20 [6, 7, 37, 52, 54, 57] and according to our calculations the average is 7.72 ± 0.33 (n =10), which is significantly less than that of the species in our study area (10.03 ± 0.18) (p < 0.001). The observed differences in brood size (2.31 chicks) are close to those of the clutch size in the European part of the species' range and the southeastern part of Western Siberia (2.23 eggs). According to our calculations, the number of chicks per attempt in first breeding cycle in the European populations of the species in the specified latitude interval is 6.24 ± 0.38 (n=10) [6-8, 25, 39, 44, 52, 54, 55, 57] and does not differ significantly from our data for Western Siberia (6.77 ± 0.35). The paper contains 4 Tables and 57 References. We thank A.V. Artemyev for help in writing the paper. The Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Download file
Counter downloads: 3

Keywords

reproductive indiсes, biotop influence, spring temperature influence, Tomsk region, Kemerovo region

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Kuranov Boris D.National Research Tomsk State UniversityKuranov@seversk.tomsknet.ru
Nekhoroshev Oleg G.National Research Tomsk State Universityoleg@green.tsu.ru
Kilin Sergei V.National Research Tomsk State University
Всего: 3

References

Гаврилов В.М., Лебедева Н.В., Ильина Т.А. Международная научная конференция "Птицы-дуплогнездники как модельные объекты в решении проблем популяционной экологии и эволюции" // Зоологический журнал. 2015. Т. 94, № 4. С. 494-496.
Cramp S., Perrins C.M. Flycatchers to Shrikes. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, 1993. Vol. VII. 577 p.
Kluyver H.N. The population ecology of the Great Tit Parus m. major L. // Ardea. 1951. Vol. 39. P. 1-135.
Лэк Д. Численность животных и ее регуляция в природе / пер. с англ. Б.Н. Сидорова; под ред. Н.П. Наумова. М.: Изд-во иностр. лит, 1957. 404 с.
Perrins C.M. Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the Great Tit, Parus major L. //j. Animal Ecology. 1965. Vol. 34. Р. 601-647.
Нумеров А.Д. Популяционная экология большой синицы в Окском заповеднике // Орнитология. М., 1987. Вып. 22. С. 3-21.
Лихачев Г.Н. Размножение и численность большой синицы (Parus major) на юге Московской области // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2002. № 6. С. 757-773.
Artemyev A.V. Population ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in the taiga forest on Lake Ladoga coast // Avian Ecology and Behaviour. 2008. Vol. 14. P. 1-33.
Куранов Б.Д. Гнездовая биология урбанизированных популяций птиц-дуплогнездников // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2009. Т. 16, № 3. С. 429-438. 10.1134/ S1995425509030138.
Куранов Б.Д., Карташев А.Г. Гнездовая экология птиц в урбанизированном ландшафте. Томск: Изд-во Том. гос. ун-та систем упр. и радиоэлектроники, 2023. 166 с.
Гашков С.И., Гриньков В.Г. Гнездовая биология западносибирской популяции большой синицы в городских и естественных местообитаниях за 30-летний период // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2023. № 61. С. 88-112.
Родимцев А.С., Ваничева Л.К. Биология размножения птиц-дуплогнездников на юго-востоке Западной Сибири // Русский орнитологический журнал. 2004. Т. 13, № 266. С. 629-648.
Чернышов В.М. Репродуктивные параметры большой синицы и белой лазоревки в Барабинской лесостепи (юг Западной Сибири) // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2008. Т. 15, № 5. С. 751-762.
Ильина И.С., Лапшина Е.И., Лавренко Н.Н., Мельцер Л.И., Романова Е.А., Богоявленский Е.А., Махно В.Д. Растительный покров Западно-Сибирской равнины. Новосибирск: Наука, 1985. 251 с.
Исаченко А.Г. Ландшафты СССР. Л.: Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та, 1985. 320 с.
Хахалкин В.В., Захарченко А.В., Нехорошев О.Г. Ландшафтно-экологический анализ территории стационара "Ломачевка" как натурной модели // Вопросы географии Сибири. Томск, 1999. Вып. 23. С. 225-236.
Both C., Artemyev A.V., Blaauw B. et al. Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier // Proceeding of the Royal Society of London. B. 2004. Vol. 271. P. 1657-1662.
Hoyt D.F. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs // AUK. 1979. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 73-77.
Мянд Р. Внутрипопуляционная изменчивость птичьих яиц. Таллин: Валгус, 1988. 193 с.
Миловидов С.П., Нехорошев О.Г., Куранов Б.Д. Птицы долин притоков реки Томи (Томская область) // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Биология. 2015. № 4 (32). С. 91-106.
Лихачев Г.Н. Материалы по динамике численности птиц, гнездящихся в искусственных гнездовьях на юге Подмосковья // Труды Приокско-Террасного заповедника / отв. ред. Н.Ф. Реймерс. М.: Лесная промышленность, 1971. Вып. 5. С. 66-110.
Шаповал А.П. Использование искусственных гнездовий птицами на Куршской косе // Русский орнитологический журнал. 2019. Т. 28, № 1777. С. 2514-2517.
Eeva T., Lehikoinen E., Sunell C. The quality of pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) and great tit (Parus major) females in an air pollution gradient // Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1997. Vol. 34, № 1. P. 61-71.
Nilsson J.-E. Resultat av 20ars holkstudier - framst rorande svartvit flugsnappare Ficedula hypoleuca // Ornis Svecica. 2008. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 52-64.
Nilsson J.-E. Numbers and breeding biology of the Great Tit Parus major - results of a 25year nest-box study // Ornis Svecica. 2011. Vol. 21. P. 123-132.
Wawrzyniak J., Gladalski M., Kalinski A., Banbura M., Markowski M., Skwarska J., Zielinski P., Banbura J. Differences in the breeding performance of great tits Parus major between a forest and an urban area: a long term study on first clutches // The European Zoological Journal. 2020. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 294-309.
Porkert J., Gashkov S., Haikola J. et al. Variation and long-term trends in the timing of breeding of different Eurasian populations of Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus // Journal of Ornithology. 2014. Vol. 155, № 4. P. 1045-1057.
Pampus M., Schmidt K.-H., Wiltschko W. Pair bond and breeding success in Blue Tits Parus caeruleus and Great Tits Parus major // Ibis. 2005. Vol. 147. P. 92-108.
Balen J.H. A Comparative Study of the Breeding Ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in Different Habitats // Ardea. 1973. Vol. 55 (1-2). P. 1-93.
Равкин Е.С., Равкин Ю.С. Птицы равнин Северной Евразии. Новосибирск: Наука, 2005. 304 с.
Гришанов Г.В., Беляков В.В. Наземные позвоночные Калининградской области: справ. пособие. Калининград: Калинингр. гос. ун-т, 2000. 69 с.
Maziarz M., Wesolowski T., Hebda G., Cholewa M. Natural nest-sites of Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval temperate forest (Bialowieza National Park, Poland) // Journal of Ornithology. 2015. Vol. 156. P. 613-623.
Nilsson S.G. The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition // Ornis Scandinavica. 1984. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 167-175.
Van Balen J.H., Booy C.J.H., van Franeker J.A., Osieck E.R. Studies on Hole-Nesting Birds in Natural Nest Sites. 1. Availability and occupation of natural nest sites // Ardea. 1982. Vol. 70. P. 1-24.
Sanz J.J. Climate change and breeding parameters of great and blue tits throughout western Palaearctic // Global Change Biology. 2002. Vol. 8. P. 409-422.
Visser M.E., Adriaensen F., van Balen J.H. et al. Variable responses to large-climate change in European Parus populations // Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2003. Vol. 270. P. 367-372.
Sanz J.J. Effects of geographic location and habitat on breeding parameters of Great Tits // AUK. 1998. Vol. 115, № 4. P. 1034-1051.
Лихачев Г.Н. О величине кладки некоторых птиц в центре европейской части СССР // Орнитология. М.: МГУ, 1967. Вып. 7. С. 165-174.
Orell M., Ojanen M. Breeding success and population dynamics in a northern great tit Parus major population // Annales Zoologici Fennici. 1983. Vol. 20. P. 77-98.
Паевский В.А. Демография птиц. Л.: Наука, 1985. 285 с.
Horak P., Mand R., Leivits A. Egg size in the great tit Parus major: individual, habitat and geographic differences // Ornis Fennica. 1995. Vol. 72. P. 97-114.
Сотников В.Н. Птицы Кировской области и сопредельных территорий. Киров: Триада плюс, 2008. Т. 2: Воробьинообразные, ч. 2. 432 с.
Чичкова А.С. Особенности размножения птиц-дуплогнездников в условиях урбанизированной среды: автореф. дис.. канд. биол. наук. Пермь: Перм. гос. ун-т, 2009. 23 с.
Смирнов О.П., Тюрин В.М. К биологии размножения большой синицы в Ленинградской области // Орнитология. М.: МГУ, 1981. Вып. 16. С. 185-188.
Крутовская Е.А. Материалы к экологии птиц искусственных гнездовий заповедника "Столбы" // Труды заповедника "Столбы" / отв. ред. Г.В. Хорошко. Красноярск: Краснояр. кн. изд-во, 1966. Вып. 5. С. 232-267.
Ojanen M., Orell M., Vaisanen R.A. Egg and clutch sizes to four passerine species in Northern Finland // Ornis Fennica. 1978. № 55. P. 60-68.
Нумеров А.Д., Приклонский С.Г., Иванчев В.П., Котюков Ю.В., Кашенцева Т.А., Маркин Ю.М., Постельных А.В. Кладки и размеры яиц юго-востока Мещерской низменности. М.: ЦНИЛ охотничьего хозяйства и заповедников, 1995. 168 с. (Труды Окского биосферного государственного заповедника; вып. 18).
Лысенков Е.В., Лапшин А.С., Спиридонов С.Н. Птицы Мордовии: оологические и нидологические материалы. Саранск: Мордов. гос. пед. ин-т, 2003. 139 с.
Шубин Н.Г. Экология млекопитающих юго-востока Западной Сибири. Новосибирск: Наука, 1991. 263 с.
Donner J., Mayer G. Die Abhangigkeit der Fortpflanzungrate vom Lebensalter bei der Kohlmeise // Naturkundliches Jahrbuch der Stadt Linz. 1964. Vol. 10. S. 337-352.
Horak P. Low fledgling success of urban Great Tits // Ornis Fennica. 1993. Vol. 70. P. 168172.
Solonen T. Breeding of the Great Tit and Blue Tit in urban and rural habitats in southern Finland // Ornis Fennica. 2001. Vol. 78. P. 49-60.
Шутова Е.В. О вторых кладках большой синицы Parus major на севере европейской части России // Русский орнитологический журнал. 2005. Т. 14, № 285. С. 358-359.
Scholin K.G. En langtidsstudie av talgoxens Parus major hackningsbiologi i ett mellans-venskt blandskogsomrade // Ornis Svecica. 2009. Vol. 19. P. 222-232.
Венгеров П.Д. Экология размножения большой синицы (Parus major) в островном лесу Центрального Черноземья (на примере Воронежского заповедника) // Вестник Оренбургского государственного педагогического университета. 2018. № 1 (25). С. 9-24. 10.32516/2303-9922.2018.25.2. URL: http://vestospu.ru/archive/2018/articles/2_25_2018.pdf.
Микляева М.А., Околелов А.Ю., Золотова О.М., Попова Е.Е., Козачек А.В. Влияние природно-техногенных условий ландшафта на формирование биологической гетерогенности популяций большой синицы (Parus major L.) // Вопросы современной науки и практики. 2021. № 1 (79). С. 51-59.
Borgstrom E. Hackningsbiologiska ron fran en langtidsstudie over en skandinavisk population av talgoxe Parus major // Ornis Svecica. 2007. Vol. 17. P. 65-74.
 Breeding biology of the great tit <i>Parus major</i> (L., 1758) in the south-east of Western Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2023. №  64. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/64/7

Breeding biology of the great tit Parus major (L., 1758) in the south-east of Western Siberia | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya - Tomsk State University Journal of Biology. 2023. № 64. DOI: 10.17223/19988591/64/7

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 250