Prussian carp Carassius gibelio in the Charvak reservoir of Uzbekistan: morphological and molecular-genetic characteristics
Morphological variability in response to environmental features is an important feature of alien species, increasing their adaptive capabilities and facilitating naturalization in new habitats. The prussian carp Carassius gibelio is currently very widespread in the world. Much of its current range is believed to be acquired as a result of human activity, with the prussian carp recognized as an invasive species capable of having a significant impact on recipient ecosystems. On the territory of Uzbekistan, prussian carp has been known in the lower reaches of the Syr-Darya and Amu-Darya since the 4th millennium BC, and was also recorded in the first half of the 20th century. However, its numbers were not large. In the 1960s, the Amur form of the prussian carp was introduced into the water bodies of Uzbekistan, as a result of a targeted introduction from the "Savvino" fish farm near Moscow and the accidental import of herbivorous fish with juveniles from the Russian Far East, after which its unauthorized resettlement began with planting material of cultivated cyprinids. In the 1970s, prussian carp found their way into the Charvak Reservoir. This is a mountain cold-water reservoir, formed on the Chirchik River (the right tributary of the Syrdarya River) and is located between the spurs of the Western Tien-Shan. With an area of only 37 km, it has a volume of about 2 km and a depth of more than 50 m. The reservoir is characterized by summer drawdown of the water level used for irrigation in the river valley Chirchik. This causes an almost complete absence of vegetation in the water area of the reservoir. Despite the atypical conditions, the prussian carp formed a self-sustaining population. There is none below the reservoir dam to the middle reaches of the Chirchik River. Indicators of counting characteristics of prussian carp in reservoir are D III-IV 17-19; A II 5-6; 26-30 (average 29) scales in the lateral line; on the first gill arch, 40-53 (on average 48) gill rakers and generally correspond to the characteristics in this climatic zone. Indices of plastic characteristics, both in traditional morphological analysis (see Table 1) and in the analysis of morphometric distances according to the “truss protocol” assessment method (see Table 2), do not have pronounced differences from the indicators of prussian carp living in a lowland reservoir Tudakul and in the fish ponds of the fish hatchery of the Research Institute of Fisheries of Uzbekistan. Analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the cyt b gene of prussian carp from the Charvak reservoir showed their similarity with samples from the upper reaches of the Yangtze river, China (see Table 3), which proves Far Eastern origin of prussian carp ih the Charvak reservoir. It is likely that it was the prussian carp, brought from the Far East, that ensured the growth in the number of the species in Uzbekistan. The question of the breadth of distribution of the Amur form of prussian carp in the region and the preservation of its native form currently remains open and requires further research using molecular genetic methods. The article contains 2 Figures, 3 Tables and 30 References. The authors are grateful to the directorate of the Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan for creating conditions for the implementation of the planned scope of work. The Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords
Uzbekistan,
Charvak reservoir,
mtDNA,
cytochrome b,
fish morphology,
biological invasions,
non-native species,
Carassius gibelio,
prussian carpAuthors
Boykobilov Jakhongir B. | Institute of zoology, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences | jaxa3522887@gmail.com |
Adilov Bakhtiyor Sh. | Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences | bakhti.genetics@gmail.com |
Interesova Elena A. | Novosibirsk Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("ZapSibNIRO"); Tomsk State University | interesovaea@yandex.ru |
Namozov Sirojiddin M. | Institute of zoology, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences | sirojiddin.namozov.90@mail.ru |
Yuldashov Mansur A. | Tashkent State Agrarian University | mansur.yuldashov64@mail.ru |
Kamilov Bakhtiyar G. | Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Astrakhan State Technical University" in Tashkent region of the Republic of Uzbekistan | b.kam58@rambler.ru |
Всего: 6
References
Khalimova N.T., Kanatbaeva T.S., Ummatova M.E. et al. Morphological characteristics of carp (Carassius Gibelio) in the conditions of pond fish farming in Uzbekistan // lOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2023. Vol. 1142, № 1. P. 012072. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1142/1/012072.
Hakimova R., Yuldashov M., Kamilov B., Ummatova M.E. Morphology, age and growth of Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) in tudakul reservoir in Uzbekistan // Acad. Sci. Repos. 2023. Vol. 4, № 5. С. 74-81.
Yerli S.V., Mangit F., Emiroglu О., Yegen V., Uysal R., Onlu E., Alp A., Buhan E., Yildmm T., Zengin M. Distribution of Invasive Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) (Tele-ostei:Cyprinidae) in Turkey // Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2014. № 14. РР. 581-590.
Мамедов Т.М., Кулиев З.М., Смирнов А.И., Ткаченко В.А. Биологические и экологические особенности карася серебристого Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782) Нахичеванского водохранилища // Рибогосподарська наука Украхни. 2009. № 3. С. 61-67.
Рыбы Казахстана : в 5 т. Т. 3: Карповые (продолжение) / В.П. Митрофанов, Г.М. Дукравец, В.А. Мельников, А.А. Баимбетов и др. Алма-Ата : Наука, 1988. 304 с.
Rolla M., Consuegra S., de Leaniz C.G. Trophic plasticity of the highly invasive Topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) inferred from stable isotope analysis // Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 2020. № 8. Р. 212. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00212.
Yavno S., Fox M.G. Morphological change and phenotypic plasticity in native and nonnative pumpkinseed sunfish in response to sustained water velocities // Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013. № 26. РР. 2383-2395. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12230.
Побединцева М.А., Решетникова С.Н., Сердюкова Н.А., Бишани А., Трифонов В.А., Интересова Е.А. Генетическая гетерогенность серебряного карася Carassius gibelio (Cyprinidae) в бассейне Средней Оби // Генетика. 2021. Т. 57, № 4. С. 429-436. doi: 10.31857/S0016675821040111.
Герасимов Ю.В. Смирнов А.К., Кодухова Ю.В. Оценка возможных причин изменений численности и половой структуры в популяциях серебряного карася (Carassius auratus gibelio Bloch., 1783) // Биология внутренних вод. 2018. № 1. С. 70-79. doi: 10.7868/S0320965218010096.
Вехов Д.А. Некоторые проблемные вопросы биологии серебряного карася Carassius auratus lato // Науч.-техн. бюл. лаб. ихтиологии ИНЭНКО. 2013. Вып. 19. С. 5-38.
Куцоконь Ю.К. Распространение и морфобиологические особенности чужеродных видов рыб в бассейне р. Рось (приток р. Днепр) // Российский Журнал Биологических Инвазий. 2010. № 1. С. 19-29.
Knytl M., Kalous L., Symonova R., Rylkova K., Rab P. Chromosome Studies of European Cyprinid Fishes: Cross-Species Painting Reveals Natural Allotetraploid Origin of a Carassius Female with 206 Chromosomes // Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013. № 139. РР. 276-283. doi: 10.1159/000350689.
National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed: 03.06.2024).
Klechtova V., Bohlen J., Freyhof J., Rab P. Molecular phylogeny of the Southeast Asian freshwater Wsh family Botiidae (Teleostei: Cobitoidea) and the origin of polyploidy in their evolution // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2006. № 39. РР. 529-541.
Altschul S F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool // J Mol Biol. 1990. Vol. 215 (3). РР. 403-410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.
Yoder M., Tandingan de Ley I., King I. W., Mundo-Ocampo M., Mann J., Blaxter M., Poiras L., De Ley P. DESS: a versatile solution for preserving morphology andextractable DNA of nematodes // Nematology. 2006. Vol. 8 (3). РР. 367-376.
Strauss R.E., Bond C.E. Taxonomic Methods: Morphology. Chapter 4 // Methods for fish biology, C. B. Schreck; P. B. Moyle editors, Bethesda, USA : American Fisheries Society, 1990. PP. 109-140.
Правдин И.Ф. Руководство по изучению рыб (преимущественно пресноводных). М. : Пищевая промышленность, 1966. 376 с.
Strauss R.E., Bookstein F.L. The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics // Syst. Zool. 1982. № 31 (2). РР. 113-135.
Салихов Т.В., Камилов Б.Г., Атаджанов А.К. Рыбы Узбекистана (определитель). Ташкент : Chinor ENK, 2001. 152 с.
Камилов Г.К. Рыбы и биологические основы рыбохозяйственного освоения водохранилищ Узбекистана. Ташкент : Фан, 1973. 220 с.
Юлдашов М.А., Камилов Б.Г. Результаты интродукций чужеродных видов рыб в водоемы Узбекистана // Научные труды Дальрыбвтуза. 2018. Т. 44 (1). С. 40-48.
Цепкин Е.А. Промысловая ихтиология низовьев Амударьи в эпоху неолита // Бюл. Моск. Об-ва испытателей природы. Отд. Биол. 1988. Т. 93, вып. 4. С. 51-56.
Берг Л. С. Рыбы пресных вод СССР и сопредельных стран. Ч. 2. М. ; Л. : Изд-во Академии наук СССР, 1949. 232 с.
Vilizzi L., Copp G. H., Hill J., Adamovich B. et al. A global-scale screening of non-native aquatic organisms to identify potentially invasive species under current and future climate conditions // Science of The Total Environmental. 2021. Vol. 788, № 147868. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2021.147868.
Самые опасные инвазионные виды России (ТОП-100) / под ред. Ю.Ю. Дгебуадзе, В.Ш. Петросян, Л.А. Хляп. М. : Тов-во научных изданий КМК, 2018. 688 с.
Ruppert J.L.W., Docherty C., Neufeld, K., Hamilton K., Mac Pherson L., Poesch M.S. Native freshwater species get out of the way: Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) impacts both fish and benthic invertebrate communities in North America // Royal Society Open Science. 2017. № 4. 170400. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170400.
Docherty C., Ruppert J., Rudolfsen T., Hamann A., Poesch M. S. Assessing the spread and potential impact of Prussian Carp Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) to freshwater fishes in western North America // BioInvasions Records. 2017. Vol. 6, № 3. PP. 291-296. doi: 10.3391/bir.2017.6.3.15.
Tarkan A., Copp G.H., Top N., Ozdemir N., Onsoy B., Bilge G., Filiz H., Yapici S., Ek-mekfi F.G., Kirankaya §. G., Emiroglu O., Gaygusuz O., Gursoy Gaygusuz Q., Oymak A., Ozcan G., Saf G. Are introduced gibel carp Carassius gibelio in Turkey more invasive in artificial than in natural waters? // Fisheries Management and Ecology. 2012. № 19. РР. 178-187. doi: 10.1m/j.1365-2400.2011.00841.x.
Froese R.D. Pauly D. Eds. Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic publication. (02/2023). URL: www.fishbase.org/ (дата обращения: 10.07.2024).