The mechanismsof induction of plants resistance to phytopatogens with humic substances.
The data of modern domestic and foreign scientific literature devoted to one of the most topical problems of agricultural science - the development of effective preparations of the new generation to struggle with phytopathogens - the inducers of plants resistance, is presented in a review. The effect of elicitors - the inductors of resistance which activates the net of signal ways, including auxin-indolil-3-acetic acid (IAA) and inducing the synthesis of pathogenesis-related proteins (PR-protein) is discussed as a basic mechanism of the following phenomenon. One of these mechanisms is examined - the increasing of reactive oxygen species formation, H2O2, in a first place with the participation of one of PR-proteins families - the cells peroxydases enzymes. The level of ones is known to be higher in cells of plants species resistant to pathogens, then in sensitive ones. The activity of plant peroxidases was shown to be increased at the abundance of IAA and this mechanism - AA-peroxydase signal way ‒ is discussed in a review.As one of the compounds which activate the following signal way, the humic (HS) substances are presented. The latter are known to possess the auxin-like effect connected with the presence of IAA in the structure and the possibility to induce the peroxydases formation in plants cells. The results of experimental and practical investigations of HS application confirming the ability of ones to induce the plants resistance to phytopathogens of Fusarium, Alternaria, Choanephora, Aspergillus, Rhizoctonia etc species are presented. The preparation on the basis of peat HA was shown to decrease the infection level of wheat root rots in the conditions of West Siberia.The mechanisms of these effects discussed from the point of view of HS participation in a IAA - peroxydase signal way. The dependence of this effect from IAA content in different fractions of HS, the molecular mass of ones, the presence of definite chemical groups and physico-chemical characteristics of HS source (soil, peat) discussed as well.The data, presented in a following review, allows to formulate the scientifically based approach to the development of highly effective preparations - inducers of plants resistance on the basis of HS of peat origin, in particular. The resource of this mineral raw material in Tomsk region are known to be one of the greatest in the world.
Keywords
reactive oxygen substances,
indolil-3-acetic acid,
peroxidase,
phytopatogens,
humic substances,
induced resistance of plants,
активные формы кислорода,
индолил-3-уксусная кислота,
пероксидаза,
гуминовые вещества,
фитопатогены,
индуцированная резистентность растенийAuthors
| Udintsev Sergey N. | Тhe State Scientific Institution "Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat of Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences", Tomsk | doctorus1955@rambler.ru |
| Burmistrova Tatiana I. | Тhe State Scientific Institution "Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat of Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences", Tomsk | burmistrova@sibniit.tomsknet.ru |
| Zabolotskaya Anastasiya V. | National Research Tomsk State University | salon7878@mail.ru |
| Zhilyakova Tatiana P. | Тhe State Scientific Institution "Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat of Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences", Tomsk | zhilyakova@sibniit.tomsknet.ru |
Всего: 4
References
Saito M., Ichinoi M., Tsuruta O. Usefulness of gel electrophoresic comparison of peroxidase for identification of Fusarium spp. Trans // Mycol. Soc. Japan. 1980. Vol. 21. Р. 229-235.
Muscolo A., Sidari M., Francioso O. The Auxin-like Activity of Humic Substances is Related to Membrane Interactions in Carrot Cell Cultures // J. Chem. Ecol. 2007. Vol. 33. Р. 115-129.
Muscolo A., Sidari M. Carboxyl and Phenolic Humic Fractions Affect Pinus Nigra Callus Growth and Metabolism // Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009. Vol. 73. Р. 1119-1129.
Pizzeghello D., Nicolini G., Nardi S. Hormone-like activities of humic substances in different forest ecosystems // New Phytologist. 2002. Vol. 155 (3). Р. 393-402.
Muscolo A., Sidari M., Attina E. Biological Activity of Humic Substances Is Related to Their Chemical Structure // Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2007. Vol. 71. Р. 75-85.
Szajdak L., Maryganova V. Quantities of indole-3-acetic acid in secondary transformed peat-moorsh soils // Вестник ТГПУ. 2008. Вып. 4 (78). С. 34-38.
Pizzeghello D., Nicolini G., Nardi S. Hormone-like activity of humic substances in Fagus sylvaticae forests // New Phytologist. 2001. Vol. 151 (3). Р. 647-657.
Quaggiotti S., Ruperti В., Pizzeghello D. Effect of low molecular size humic substances on nitrate uptake and expression of genes involved in nitrate transport in maize (Zea mays L.) // J. Experim. Botany. 2004. Vol. 398. Р. 803-813.
Muscolo A., Cutrupi S., Nardi S. IAA detection in humic substances // Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1998. Vol. 30(8-9). Р. 1199-1201.
El-Ghamry A.M., El-Hai K.M.A., Ghoneem K.M. Amino and Humic Acids Promote Growth, Yield and Disease Resistance of Faba Bean Cultivated in Clayey Soil // Australian J. Basic. & App. Sci. 2009. Vol. 3(2). Р. 731-739.
Юшкова Е.И. Биологическая активность гуминового комплекса различного происхождения и его влияние на рост и развитие растений : дис. … д-ра биол. наук. Воронеж, 2010. 356 с.
Pascual J.A., Garcia G., Hernandez T., Lynch I. Effectiveness of municipal waste compost and its humic fraction in suppressing Pythium ultimo // Microb. Ecol. 2002. Vol. 44. P. 59-68.
Abd-El-Kareem F. Induced Resistance in Bean Plants Against Root Rot and Alternaria Leaf Spot Diseases Using Biotic and Abiotic Inducers under Field Conditions // Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 2007. Vol. 3(6). Р. 767-774.
Hoitink H.A.J., Ramos L.Z. Disease suppression with compost: history, principles and future // Intern. Conf. «Soil & Compost Eco Biology». Leon - Spain, 2004. Р. 185-198.
Ziedan H.E. Soil treatment with biofertilizers for controlling peanut rot and pod Rot diseases in Nobaria Province // Egypt J. Phytopathol. 2000. Vol. 28. P. 17-26.
Scheuerell S.J., Mahaffee W.H. Variability associated with suppression of Gray Mold (Botrytis cinerea) on Geranium by foliar applications of nonaerated and aerated compost teas // Plant. Dis. 2006. Vol. 90. P. 1201-1208.
Сысоева Л.Н., Бурмистрова Т.И., Трунова Н.М. Применение продуктов переработки торфа в качестве индукторов защиты растений от грибных инфекций // Химия растительного сырья. 2008. № 1. С. 123-126.
Abd-El-Kareem F., Abd-El-Latif F. M., Fotouh Y.O. Integrated Treatments Between Humic Acid and Sulfur for Controlling Early Blight Disease of Potato Plants under Field Infection // Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 2009. Vol. 5(6). Р. 1039-1045.
Siddiqui Y., Meon S., Ismail R. In vitro fungicidal activity of humic acid fraction from oil palm compost // Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009. Vol. 11. Р. 448-452.
Moliszewska E., Pisarek T. Influence of humic substances on the growth of two phytopathogenic soil fungi // Environ. Int. 1996. Vol. 22. Р. 579-584.
Loffredo E., Mariagrazia B., Fedele C., Nicola S. In vitro assessment of the inhibition of humic substances on the growth of two strains of Fusarium oxysporum // Cooper. J. Intern. Soc. Soil. Sci. 2007. Vol. 1. Р. 1-18.
El-Mohamedy R. S.R., Ahmed M.A. Effect of Biofertilizers and Humic Acid on control of Dry Root Rot Disease and Improvement Yield Quality of Mandarin (Citrus reticulate Blanco) // Research J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 2009. Vol. 5(2). Р. 127-137.
Шаповал О.А., Вакуленко В.В., Прусакова Л.Д. Регуляторы роста растений // Защита и карантин растений. 2008. № 12. С. 53-88.
Wedge D.E., Smith B.J. Discovery and evaluation of natural product-based fungicides for disease control of small fruits // Disease management of fruits and vegetables. Springer Netherlands, 2006. Vol. 2. Р. 1-14.
Pflug W., Ziechman W. Humic acids and disruption of bacterial cell wall by isozyme // Soil Boil Biochem. 1982. Vol. 14. Р. 165-166.
Козявина К.Н. Изменение активности антиоксидантной ферментной системы и фрагментации ДНК Pisum sativum L. при апоптозе и некрозе под действием двухвалентных ионов магния и экстракта триходермы : автореф. … канд. биол. наук. Воронеж, 2010. 24 с.
Граскова И.А., Антипина И.В., Потапенко О.Ю., Войников В.К. Влияние патогена на динамику активности внеклеточной пероксидазы суспензионных клеток картофеля // J. Stress. Physiology & Biochemistry. 2005. Vol. 1(1). Р. 16-20.
Газарян И.Г., Хуштульян Д.М., Тишков В.И. Особенности структуры и механизма действия пероксидаз растений // Успехи биологической химии. 2006. Т. 46. С. 303-322.
Passardi F., Zamocky M., Favet J. Phylogenetic distribution of catalase-peroxidases: are these patches of order in chaos? // Gene. 2007. Vol. 397. Р. 101-113.
Szajdak L., Maryganova M. Occurrence of auxin in some organic soils // Agron. Res. 2007. № 5(2). Р. 175-187.
Neill S.J., Desikan R., Clarke A. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signaling molecules in plants // J. Experim. Botany. 2002. Vol. 53. Р. 1237-1247.
Almagro L., Ros L V.G., Belchi-Navarro S. Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions // J. Experim. Botany. 2009. Vol. 60(2). Р. 377-390.
Garcia-Brugger A., Lamotte O., Vandelle E. Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defences // Molec. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006. Vol. 7. Р. 711-724.
Scherer N.M., Thompson C.E., Freitas L.B. Patterns of molecular evolution in pathogenesisrelated proteins // Genetics & Molec. Biol. 2005. Vol. 28. Р. 645-653.
Loon L.C., Rep M., Pieterse C.M.J. Significance of inducible defence-related proteins in infected plants // Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006. Vol. 44. Р. 135-162.
Zhao J., Davis L.C., Verpoorte R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites // Biotechnol. Adv. 2005. Vol. 23. Р. 283-333.
Тютерев С.Л. Механизмы действия фунгицидов на фитопатогенные грибы. СПб. : ИПК «Нива», 2010. 172 с.
Поликсенова В.Д. Индуцированная резистентность растений к патогенам и абиотическим стрессовым факторам (на примере томата) // Вестник БГУ. 2009. сер. 2. № 1. С. 48-60.
Санин С.С., Назарова Л.Н. Фитосанитарная обстановка на посевах пшеницы в Российской Федерации (1991-2008 гг.). Аналитический обзор // Защита и карантин растений. 2010. № 2. С. 69-88.
