Phytolits of some mesomorphic species of bluegrasses (Poa L.) section Stenopoa and possibility of their use in systematics
Phytolits are the amorphous inclusions of a silicon dioxide. They can be found inleaves, interstices and glumes of many plants. Phytolits of grasses, being in most casescommon epidermal cells, impregnated with silicon, can serve for the diagnostic purposesin the same measure as the different taxa of grasses differ on a structure of epidermis.The purpose of our research was the specification of diagnostic value of phytoliths charactersfor bluegrasses systematics at specific and section level and an estimation of possibilityof using these characters for differentiation for morphologically close species.Three mesomorphic species of bluegrasses, belonging to closely related sectionsStenopoa (Poa palustris L. and P. nemoralis L.) and Tichopoa (P. compressa L.) havebeen investigated.The search of abaxial epidermis of 10 samplings (3-5 samples from each one) haven'trevealed essential anatomic distinctions among them. In costal zone all investigatedsamples had a pricles and hooks. The long cells of costal zone are narrower than ofintercostals zone, with parallel sinuous walls. Short cells are short and narrow, in pairor they may be solitary. The cells of intercostals zone are mainly long, but at some samplesthe special arrangement of long cells occurs: in the middle of intercostals zone thecells to be longer than in marginal part, and short cells and stomata appear. The stomataoccur in horizontal rows, usually 2 or 1 (between small veins). The walls of long cellsmay vary very much, from non-sinuous to markedly sinuous. The pricles may occur onthe leave margins as well.The search of phytolits has revealed their considerable variety both in form, and insizes. The search of epidermis allow to assume that they belong both to costal (more narrowand short cells) and intercostals (wide and long ones) areas. By origin the observedphytoliths represent the covering cells of epidermis, filled with silica, and trichomes, presentedby pricles and hooks of various shape and form. The observed covering cells ofepidermis as a whole belong to 4 types: 1) long cells with sinuous walls; 2) short cellswith sinuous walls; 3) long cells with non-sinuous walls; 4) short cells with non-sinuouswalls. Nevertheless, researches have shown the division to be quite relative and assuredthat a lot of intermediate forms between these 4 types occur. All observed phytoliths arecharacteristic for festucoid grasses. The marked difference in phytoliths of P. palustris,P. nemoralis, and P. compressa and sections Stenopoa and Tichopoa as well, has notbeen not revealed, and, in spite of they being significant variable, the unique form, characteristiconly for one of the investigated sections or species has not been found. Thus,the authors regard the phytoliths characters as being of limited taxanomical value, butthese data can be used for identification of phitoliths, isolated from fossils.
Keywords
P. nemoralis,
P. compressa,
Pоа palustris,
phytoliths,
epidermis,
plant anatomy,
P. compressa,
P. nemoralis,
Pоа palustris,
фитолиты,
эпидерма,
анатомия растенийAuthors
Olonova Marina V. | Tomsk State University | olonova @green.tsu.ru |
Mezina Natalia S. | Tomsk State University | olonova @green.tsu.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Олонова М.В. Исследование анатомического строения листьев Poa palustris и Poa argunensis в популяциях // Труды Междунар. конф. по анатомии и морфологии растений. СПб., 1997. С. 298-299.
Олонова М.В. Анатомическая структура эпидермы сибирских мятликов секции Stenopoa // Биоморфологические исследования в современной ботанике: Материалы Междунар. конф. (Владивосток, 18-21 сентября 2007). Владивосток, 2007. С. 330-334.
Барыкина Р.П., Веселова Т.Д., Девятов А.Г. и др. Справочник по ботанической микротехнике. Основы и методы. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2004. 312 с.
Москалева Г.И. Анатомические методы исследования культурных растений: Метод. указания. Л.: ВИР, 1989. 76 с.
Мирославов Е.А. Структура и функция эпидермиса листа покрытосеменных растений. Л.: Наука, 1974. 184 с.
Ellis R.P. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae. II. The epidermis as seen in surfase view // Bothalia. 1979. Vol. 12. P. 641-671.
Мирославов Е.А. Некоторые черты ксероморфного строения эпидермиса листа ряда злаков // Ботанический журнал. 1962. Т. 47, № 9. С. 1339-1342.
Галкин М.А. К использованию анатомических исследований в диагностике и таксономии растений на примере мятликов // Актуальные вопросы фармацеи. Ставрополь, 1974. Вып. 2. С. 329-331.
Пояркова Е.Н. Анатомическое строение листьев мятликов флоры УССР // Ботаниче- ский журнал. 1966. Т. 51, № 6. С. 841-844.
Girija R.P. Key to some Kanzas (USA) grasses based upon leaf anatomy // Rev. Fac. Sciens. Univ. Lisboa. 1969-1970. P. 16, № 1. P. 281-290.
Олонова М.В. Морфолого-анатомические признаки сибирских видов рода Роа (Роасеае) // Ботанический журнал. 2003. Т. 88, № 11. С. 86-95.
Цвелев Н.Н. Злаки СССР. Л.: Наука, 1976. 788 с.
Clifford H.T., Watson L. Identifing grasses. Data, methods and illustrating. Brisbane, 1977. 146 p.
Garcia-Gonzalez R. Epidermis foliares de algunas especies de Festuca, Poa y Bellardiochloa en el Pirineo Occidental // Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid. 1983. T. 39, № 2. P. 389-404.
Ball T.V., Ehlers R., Standing M.D. Review of typologic and morphometric analysis of phytoliths produced by wheat and barley // Breeding Science. 2009. Vol. 59, № 5. P. 505-512.
Metcalfe C.R. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. I. Gramineae. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960. 731 p.
Blinnikov M.S. Phytolyths inplants and soilsof the interiorpacific Nord West USA // Review of Paleobotany and palynology. 2005. № 135. P. 71-98.
Piperno D.R. Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press, 2006. P. 89-102.
Brown D.A. Prospects and limits of a phytilith key for grasses in the central United States // Journal of Archaeological Sciense. 1984. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 345-368.
Delhon C. Potentiel de l'analys des phytolithes contenus dans les pates ceramicues et les materiaux de construction // Cahier des themes transversaux ArScAn. 2005-2006. Vol. 7. P. 86-93.
Elbaum R., Weiner S., Albert R.M., Elbaum M. Detection on burning of plant materials in the archaeological record by changes in the refractive indices of siliceous phytoliths // Journal of Archaeological Sciense. 2003. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 217-226.
Гольева А.А. Опыт в использовании анализа фитолитов в почвоведении // Почвоведение. 1995. № 12. С. 1498-1503.
Скрипник О. Использование информации о почвах для восстановления ландшафтного разнообразия степей // Степной бюллетень. 2003. № 13. С. 10-12.
Fisher R., Bourn C.N., Fisher W.F. Opal phytoliths as an indicator of the floristics of prehistoric grasslands // Geoderma. 1995. Vol. 68, № 4. P. 243-255.
Kurmann M. An opal phytolith and palynomorph study of extant and fossil soils in Kansas (U.S.A.) // Paleogeography, Paleoclymatology, Paleoecology. 1985. Vol. 49, № 3-4. P. 217-235.
Krishnan S., Samson N.P., Ravichandran P., Dayanandran P. Zphytoliths of Indian grasses and their potential use in identification // Botanical Journal of Linnean Society. 2000. Vol. 132. P. 241-252.
Мырлян Н., Медяник С. Использование фитолитов для палеореконструкций: определение, методы химической обработки и морфологическое разнообразие // Bulletinul Institutului de Geologie si seismologie al ASM. 2008. № 2. Р. 39-47.