On the Prospects for the Development of the Execution of Criminal Sentences and Probation in the Republic of Kazakhstan | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2021. № 17. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/17/24

On the Prospects for the Development of the Execution of Criminal Sentences and Probation in the Republic of Kazakhstan

The progressive system is a complex interdisciplinary institution of criminal and penal law, which includes several independent institutions, In applying them, the legal status of the convict changes depending on the degree of their correction: the scope of their rights is either expanded or limited. In the current legislation, with the establishment of a general rule on various conditions for serving a sentence within one correctional facility, the progressive system has acquired a complete form and can be considered the basis of all punitive and educational influence on convicts. Currently, there is an urgent need for a more detailed classification of positively characterised convicts. Each positive degree of convicts’ behaviour must correspond to certain confinement conditions and to a certain institution of the progressive system, namely: upon reaching Positive Degree 1, the convict is kept in the usual conditions of a correctional facility (an institution for changing confinement conditions within one correctional facility); upon reaching Positive Degree 2, the convict is given light confinement conditions; upon reaching Positive Degree 3, the convict is given preferential confinement conditions; upon reaching Positive Degree 4, the convict is transferred to a facility of a different type; upon reaching Positive Degree 5, the institution of change of punishment is applied; upon reaching Positive Degree 6, parole of the convicted person is possible. It is necessary to release the court from the function of changing the process of executing the sentence and give this function to the supervisory commissions created at the correctional facility. The court will only appoint the type of punishment, and the execution of its decision should be entrusted to the Committee of the Penitentiary System and the Supervisory Commission. In this case, the commission collectively decides on the application of all the institutions of the progressive system, up to the institution of parole. The appointment and execution of probation is also decided on by the supervisory commission.

Download file
Counter downloads: 21

Keywords

criminal policy, humanization, deprivation of liberty, punishments alternative to imprisonment, progressive system of execution of imprisonment, confinement conditions, behavior of convicts

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Skakov Aydarkan B.Academy of Law and Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russiaaidarkan@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Селиверстов В.И. Проблемы дифференциации уголовно-правового воздействия на осужденных, отбывающих лишение свободы // Отбывание лишения свободы осужденными за экономические и (или) должностные преступления: итоги теоретического исследования. М. : Юриспруденция, 2019. 464 с.
Ванесов Г.А. Прогрессивная система отбывания лишения свободы / под ред. Н.А. Стручкова. М., 1970. 87 с.
Астемиров З.А. О сущности и критериях исправления осужденных // Вопросы исправления и перевоспитания заключенных. Ростов н/Д, 1966. С. 20-26.
Ткачевский Ю.М. Освобождение от отбывания наказаний по действующему советскому уголовному праву : автореф. дис.. д-ра юрид. наук. М., 1965. 36 с.
Чукмаитов Д.С. Теоретические основы системы исполнения наказаний по законодательству Республики Казахстан. Алматы : Баспа, 1999. 342 с.
Михлин А.С. Дискуссионные вопросы замены неотбытой части наказания более мягким // Проблемы освобождения осужденных от отбывания наказания : сб. науч. тр. № 67 / под ред. Н.А. Стручкова. М., 1983. С. 30-35.
Уткин В.А. Проблемы теории уголовных наказаний : курс лекций. Томск : Издательский Дом Томского государственного университета, 2018. 240 с.
Бажанов О.И. Прогрессивная система исполнения наказания. Минск : Наука и техника, 1981. 167 с.
Гришко А.Я., Оводкова Л.С. Деятельность прокуратуры и Уполномоченного по правам человека по обеспечению прав и законных интересов лиц в местах принудительного содержания. Рязань : Академия ФСИН России, 2015. 132 с.
Уткин В.А. Альтернативные санкции в России: состояние, проблемы и перспективы. М. : Penal Reform International, 2013. 67 с.
Российское уголовно-исполнительное право : в 2 т. Т. 1: Общая часть : учебник / Ю.А. Кашуба, В.Б. Малинин, В.Н. Орлов и др. ; под ред. В.Е. Эминова, В.Н. Орлова. М. : МГЮА имени О.Е. Кутафина, 2010. С. 28-29.
Уткин В.А. Курс лекций по уголовно-исполнительному праву. Общая часть. Томск, 1995. 62 с.
 On the Prospects for the Development of the Execution of Criminal Sentences and Probation in the Republic of Kazakhstan | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2021. № 17. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/17/24

On the Prospects for the Development of the Execution of Criminal Sentences and Probation in the Republic of Kazakhstan | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2021. № 17. DOI: 10.17223/23088451/17/24

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 276