Institute of special order of court decision making at the consent of the person with the charges brought needs improvement | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2013. № 1(1).

Institute of special order of court decision making at the consent of the person with the charges brought needs improvement

Special order of the court decision making at the consent of the person with the charges brought regulated by Chapter 40 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation should be amended in the way to ensure the implementation of the function of the Russian criminal proceedings. To solve the existing problems the court considering a criminal case in a simplified procedure should be given the right to examine the evidence in order to establish the circumstances listed in Article 73 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation . Since the purpose of criminal proceedings is to make a grounded, fair judgment, the court must be able to examine the evidence to the extent it needs. With this approach, the provisions of Article 317 of the RF Criminal Procedure Code on the inadmissibility of the appeal of a sentence made in a special order, based on its inconsistency with the real circumstances, should be excluded from the criminal procedure law. With this approach it can be argued that the purposes and principles of the Russian criminal proceedings are the same, typical of the continental criminal procedure.

Download file
Counter downloads: 282

Keywords

цель уголовного процесса, принцип публичности, упрощенное уголовное судопроизводство, особый порядок принятия судебного решения, тип уголовного судопроизводства, purpose of criminal procedure, principle of publicity, simplified criminal procedure, special order of court decision making, type of criminal proceedings

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Piyuk Aleksey V.Megion City Courtavaleks2@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Семенцов В.А., Белохортов И.И. Оценка доказательств судом первой инстанции по уголовному делу: монография. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2012.
Свиридов М.К. Установление истины на предварительном расследовании и в судебном разбирательстве // Правовые проблемы укрепления российской государственности: сб. статей. Ч. 51 / отв. ред. М.К. Свиридов, Ю.К. Якимович. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2011.
Петрухин И.Л. Концептуальные основы реформы уголовного судопроизводства // Государство и право. 2002. № 5.
Трубникова Т.В. Некоторые проблемы особого порядка судебного разбирательства // Материалы Междунар. науч.-практич. конф. «Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс РФ: год правоприменения и преподавания». М., 2004.
Строгович М.С. Избранные труды. Т. 3. Теория судебных доказательств. М.: Наука, 1991.
 Institute of special order of court decision making at the consent of the person with the charges brought needs improvement | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2013. № 1(1).

Institute of special order of court decision making at the consent of the person with the charges brought needs improvement | Ugolovnaya yustitsiya – Russian Journal of Criminal Law. 2013. № 1(1).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 11361
Download file