Tactical plan of on-site verification of testimony

It is appropriate to allocate a number of common tactics to optimize the proceeding process of the investigation in the complex of tactics used during the on-site verification of testimony. Without repeating the mechanism for carrying out and fixing the investigative action already stated in the literature, I would like to highlight some of the most important elements of the on-site verification of testimony, the use of which is necessary and possible in the course of its proceeding and recording of its progress and results: Tactics to establish psychological contact and obtain the voluntary consent of the person to participate in the on-site verification of testimony. The procedural aspect of this consent is in the need to fix the rule in Article 194 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Tactics of the order of movement of all participants of the on-site verification of testimony in the course of its proceeding. Tactics of a free story, which now has the status of a procedural rule (Part 4 of Article 194 of the RF Criminal Procedure Code) and starts the on-site vrification of testimony. The rule of non-interference of the investigator in the giving of testimony by the person verified with the ability to ask questions only after the person ends the story about what happened. Part 2 of Article 194 of the RF Criminal Procedure Code fixes inadmissibility of any foreign intervention and leading questions during the on-site verification of testimony. Tactical and psychological techniques to determine the psychological type of the person whose testimony is verified to provide an appropriate influence on the person for better accuracy and reliability of the information they provide. Tactics to enhance the memory of the person whose testimony is verified. It is one of the most effective means of correction of distortions that appear when testifying. The most efficient in this case is the use of associations the person verified has in connection with the place of testimony verification. Using the knowledge of experts and additional means of fixation of the process and results of the on-site verification of testimony. The choice of the expert depends in each case on the type of crime and the criminal event space features that define the kind of expertise that can be claimed in conducting and recording the progress and results of the on-site verification of testimony, as well as the type of technical or scientific and technological means that are planned to be used during the investigative procedure.

Keywords

Authors

References