Authentication of terminology shamanic Buryats cult by the example of the concepts of orgoy and mayhabshi | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2017. № 28. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/28/17

Authentication of terminology shamanic Buryats cult by the example of the concepts of orgoy and mayhabshi

The relevance of research. In modern world the processes of globalization lead to the formation of a new cultural community of people, embracing all mankind as a whole, and inevitably contributes to the unification of the cultural traditions, values and behavioral norms. These trends are progressive, irreversible, but as a result is manifest danger of gradual loss of many traditional cultures of wide variety of ethnic groups. In this regard, activities to description, to structuring and to cataloging of aspects of the traditional cultures of indigenous peoples, including the Buryats, acquires unquestionable relevance. Shamanic cult as the basis of religious beliefs of the Buryats an integral part of their traditional culture. Shaman's costume - a multi-complex of attributes which possess a complicated and often entangled semantics having deep archaic roots. But at the same time during the long historical stages of development of culture of the Buryats original meaning of costume elements repeatedly subjected to the transformation and upgrading, in particular, under the influence of other cultures and religions. The changes that took place at different times in the details of the shamanic costume of the Buryats are recorded by researchers of Siberian peoples. Historically, the Buryats is ethnically heterogeneous. Due to these factors, appears a variation of many concepts, which creates ambiguity in the description, classification and interpretation of many of the terms defining the attributes and elements of shamanic costume of the Buryats. Obviously, the actual task is to clarify the terminology of the sha-manic cult. This article is an attempt to understand the etymology of the concepts orgoy and mayhab-shi and give them a more accurate definition. The extent of the scientific problem elaboration. Attributes of the shamanic cult of the Buryats were the object of scientific study by S. P. Baldaev, D. Banzarov, C. J. Zhamtsarano, M. D. Zomonov, G. V. Ksenofontov, I. A. Manzhigeev, T. I. Mikhailov, A. G. Okladnikov, B. E. Petri, G. N. Potanin, E. D. Prokofieva, T. D. Skrynnikova, M. N. Khangalov, G. Ts. Tsybikov and other Russian scientists. To theoretical comprehension of the problem contributed a well-known foreign anthropologists, such as L. Levy-Brull, C. Levi-Stross, J. Fraser, M. Eliade, as well as modern experts in the field of shamanism W. Tkach, K. Humphrey, etc. Investigations to determination the etymology of shamanic terms, which expands our knowledge of the semantics of the costume and promotes to restoration lost ties with representations of distant ancestors of the Buryats are relatively few. In addition, they are ambiguously interprete the many important attributes of shaman clothing, in particular, such as orgoy and mayhabshi. Object of the research is traditional shamanic costume of the Buryats. Subject of the study is the attributes of shamanic costume of the Buryats orgoy and mayhabshi. The aim of research is a conducting of historical and culturalogical analysis of the origin, development and change of the attributes of shamanic costume of the Buryats and clarification of concepts orgoy and mayhabshi. The empirical base of the article are the results of interviews of shamans acting in the local community "Tengeri" (Ulan-Ude). Theoretical and practical significance of this article is the progress to understanding of shamanic cult, as an integral part of the traditional culture of the Buryats and as a consequence, in the preservation of the identity of the Buryat ethnos. Due to the comparative method of research based on the available ethnographic sources we can go from the particular to the general. Specific field studies, the most important part of which is the knowledge of the language of studied people, promote to deeper cognition of traditions of the ethnos and as a result an adequate interpretation of the results of the study.

Download file
Counter downloads: 196

Keywords

атрибут, корона, майхабши, обряд посвящения, оргой, потусторонний мир, ритуал, традиционная культура, шаманский костюм, экстаз, attribute, crown, costume, mayhabshi, rite, orgoy, initiatory, hereafter, ritual, traditional culture, shaman, ecstasy

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Khingeeva Larisa M.East Siberian State Institute of CultureKhingeeva@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Хангалов М.Н. Собрание сочинений. Т. 1. Улан-Удэ, 1958. 550 с.
Хангалов М.Н. Собрание сочинений Т. 2. Улан-Удэ, 1959. 444 с.
Прокофьева Е.Д. Шаманские костюмы народов Сибири // Религиозные представления и обряды народов Сибири: сб. МАЭ. Т. 27. Л.: Наука, 1971. С. 3-100.
Петри Б.Э. Степени посвящения // Шаманизм народов Сибири: Этнографические материалы XVIII-XX вв.: хрестоматия / сост. Т.Ю. Сем. СПб., 2006. С. 175-178.
Цыбиков Г.Ц. Избранные труды: в 2 т. Т. 2: О Центральном Тибете, Монголии и Бурятии. Новосибирск: Наука. Сиб. отд-ние, 1991. 232 с.
Михайлов В.А. Религиозная мифология. Улан-Удэ: Соёл Издательство Министерства культуры РБ, 1996. 111 с.
Маласагаев М. Ф. 362. Оп. 1. Д. 1.
Маласагаев М. Ф. 362. Оп. 1. Д. 13.
Болхосоев С.Б. Белый шаман в традиции предбайкальских бурят-булагатов // Живая природа - живая кочевая культура: Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Республика Бурятия, Тункинский район, 14 июня 2014 г. / науч. ред. Р.И. Пшеничникова. Улан-Удэ, 2014. 147 с.
Базаров Б.Д. Таинства и практика шаманизма: в 2 кн. Кн. 1: Тайна посвящения в шаманы; Кн. 2: Таинства и практика шаманизма. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во ОАО «Республиканская тип.», 2008. 235 с.
Базаров Б.Д. Таинства и практика шаманизма: кн. 3. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во Бурят. гос. унта, 2009. 207 с.
Галданова Г.Р. Доламаистские верования бурят / отв. ред. Л.П. Потапов. Новосибирск : Наука. Сиб. отд-ние, 1987. 113, [2] с.
Михайлов Т.М. Бурятский шаманизм: История, структура и социальные функции. Новосибирск, 1987. 288 с.
Банзаров Д. Чёрная вера, или Шаманство у монголов и другие статьи / под ред. Г.Н. Потанина. СПб., 1891. 129 с.
Жамцарано Ц.Ж. Путевые дневники: 1903-1907 гг. / отв. ред. Ц.П. Ванчикова; сост. В.Ц. Лыксокова, Ц.П. Ванчикова, И.В. Кульганек. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во БНЦ СО РАН, 2001. 382 с.
Гирченко В.П. Русские и иностранные путешественники XVII, XVIII и первой половины XIX в. о бурят-монголах. Улан-Удэ: Гос. бурят-монгольское кн. изд-во, 1939. 92 с.
Манжигеев И.А. Бурятские шаманистические и дошаманистические термины. М.: Наука, 1978. 128 с.
Бабуев С.Д. Буряад зоной урданай hj-удал байдалай тайлбари толи / С.Д. Бабуев, Ц.Ц. Бальжинимаева. Улаан-Удэ: Бэлиг» хэблэл, 2004. 352 х.: зурагууд.
Цыденов Э.М. Обряд посвящения в шаманы в Улан-Удэ: традиции и современность // Новый исторический вестник. 2012. Вып. № 33/2012. С. 73-83.
Релич Ратка. Шаманский транс как феномен традиционной культуры бурят: дис.. канд. культурологии. Улан-Удэ, 2012. 181 с.
Торчинов Е.А. Религии мира: опыт запредельного. Психотехника и трансперсональные состояни. СПб.: Азбука-классика, 2005. С. 123-143.
 Authentication of terminology shamanic Buryats cult by the example of the concepts of <i>orgoy</i> and <i>mayhabshi</i> | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2017. № 28. DOI:  10.17223/22220836/28/17

Authentication of terminology shamanic Buryats cult by the example of the concepts of orgoy and mayhabshi | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2017. № 28. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/28/17

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2980