Architectural space of the new time: dynamics and organizational features | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/33/10

Architectural space of the new time: dynamics and organizational features

Studying and understanding the ways of space organization, as well as the dynamics of it throughout history is relevant, since it allows us to understand how and why people organize their lives one way or the other. The purpose of this article is to analyze the specifics of understanding and organizing space in the XIX-XX centuries and to identify the interrelations between the way people viewed the world and organized their space, both at a level of a separate building and at a level of organization of the external environment (a city, a street, a yard). Since antiquity, the only measure of space was a human being, and therefore it was centric. The views of space started to form in connection with the movement of a man into the distance, deep into nature - away from himself. The middle ages brought a change in the perception of the world: from horizontal point of view to the vertical one, and that was confirmed by architecture: high cathedrals, town hall buildings, bell towers and castles being built. During this period space acquires an orderly and strictly hierarchical order. During the Renaissance space became a commensurable with a man, which was reflected in the return to the domination of the horizontal view on the space organization: architecture once again became anthropocentric. Unlike linear space during Renaissance period, the space of the New Era is built on the axial principle. This principle of organization predetermined the fixation of the attention at a single point, causing all the space to be viewed from one angle, making it homogenous and unified because of it. The world or globalization is characterized by a change of basic values, the transition from statics to dynamics, from the space of places where one could stop and feel peace to the space of flows and connections that never stop moving and that are constantly replenished with new faces and objects. Postmodern architecture is not only a function and a structure, but also a means of communication. The main tendency of space organization in the architecture of the first half of the 20th century was the separation of the basic life processes and, at the same time, the establishment of the necessary connection between them in a building. To better understand the space organization of the XIX-XX centuries, we can state the transition from a unified, absolute space, viewed from a single angle, to a unified space observed from multiple points of view, to a space divided into separate self-contained sectors that simulate reality and its objects. It can also be noted that the New Age and its architecture has been developing in the environment created by other, new generations, and as a result, it is the environment that begins to dictate to society how to move in a public and personal space. As for old buildings and change in their semantic meaning: the space has turned from a material container for living and acting inside to a space of social relations and communication.

Download file
Counter downloads: 233

Keywords

архитектура, модернизм, постмодернизм, пространство, интерьер, Architecture, modernism, postmodernism, space, interior

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Chaplya Tatyana V.Novosibirsk State Pedagogical UniversityChap_70@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Loiko O.T. The Cyberspace in Relation to the Cultural Memory [Electronic resource] // Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: from Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth : proceedings of the 27th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Milan, Italy, 4-5 May 2016. Milan: IBIMA, 2016. P. 68-74. URL: http://www.ibima.org/ITALY20 16/papers/timo.html (дата обращения: 16.11.2017).
Искусство ансамбля : Художественный предмет - интерьер - архитектура - среда. М. : Изобразительное искусство, 1988. 464 с.
Тихомирова Е.Е., Чжао Цзиннань. Когда жилище становится домом: универсальные культурные смыслы китайской традиции // Вестник Новосибирского государственного педагогического университета. 2012. Т. 7, № 3. С. 98-103. : Избранные политические статьи, выступления и ин-
Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть тервью. М. : Праксис, 2006. Ч. 3. 320 с. в зеркале истории коммуникативного пространства // университета. 2017. № 415. С. 136-143. DOI:
Чапля Т.В. История архитектуры Вестник Томского государственного 10.17223/15617793/415/19
Видеркер В.В. Неомифологический текст в культуре символизма // Философия образования. 2011. № 5 (38). С. 260-268.
Ефремова О.В. Теоретические концепции освоения пространства и особенности формирования художественной пространственной организации современного жилого интерьера // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2011. Т. 13, № 2 (21). С. 468-472.
Фландерс Дж. Сотворение дома. М. : Центрполиграф, 2016. 336 с.
Мак-Коркодейл Ч. Убранство жилого интерьера от античности до наших дней. М.: Искусство, 1990. 245 с.
Кириченко Е.И. Русская архитектура 1830-1910-х годов. М. : Искусство, 1978. 400 с.
Очерки истории теории архитектуры Нового и Новейшего времени. СПб. : Коло, 2009. 656 с.
Николаева Е.В. Фракталы городской культуры. М. : Страта, 2014. 347 с.
Бодрийяр Ж. Система вещей. М. : РУДОМИНО, 1995. 174 с.
Арнхейм Р. Динамика архитектурных форм. М. : Стройиздат, 1984. 192 с.
Гутнов А.Э., Лежава И.Г. Будущее города. М. : Стройиздат, 1977. 126 с.
Заборова Е.Н. Феномен города с точки зрения теории социального пространства // Вестник ЮУрГУ. 2006. № 2 (57). С. 188-195.
Ситар С. Архитектура внешнего мира : Искусство проектирования и становления европейских физических представлений. М.: Новое из-во, 2013. 272 с.
Добрицына И.А. От постмодернизма - к нелинейной архитектуре: Архитектура в контексте современной философии и науки. М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2004. 416 с.
Неботова Е.С. Формирование эстетических принципов архитектуры постмодернизма // Вестник МГУКИ. 2014. № 4 (61). С. 222-225.
Лефевр А. Производство пространства. М. : StrelkaPress, 2015. 432 с. Архитектурное пространство Нового времени: динамика и особенности организации |31
Харламов А.В. Социальное отчуждение в информационном взаимодействии : автореф. дис. филос. наук. Кемерово : КемГУКИ, 2007. 20 с.
Зигель К. Структура и форма в современной архитектуре. М. : Стройиздат, 1965. 267 с.
Шилин В.В. Архитектура и психология. Н. Новгород : ННГАСУ, 2011. 66 с.
Loyko O.T. Well-beingasa Phenomenon: Research Paradigms of the Fifth Age [Electronic resource] // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS). 2017. Vol. 19: Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2016). P. 438-443. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs. 2017.01.59 http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/37280. (дата обращения: 16.11.2017).
 Architectural space of the new time: dynamics and organizational features | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI:  10.17223/22220836/33/10

Architectural space of the new time: dynamics and organizational features | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2019. № 33. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/33/10

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 654