Goropius Becanus, the Adamic language, and the Renaissance Mytholinguistics
The analyses is focused on a linguistic aspect of the cultural and historic theory of Goropius Be-canus, an outstanding humanist of the sixteenth century. A main intention directing Becanus was to substantiate the primordial status and epistemological perfection of his native Dutch and thereby enhance the prestige of his national culture. The author explores the set of beliefs and presumptions underlying the scholar's cultural-historic scheme as well as the modes and means of substantiating "adamicity" of Dutch determined by it. It is argued that the means exploited by Becanus were generally used in the republic of letters for extolling of one or another classical tradition and language: Hebrew, Old Egyptian, Latin etc. Those resources included a spectrum of mythohistoric narratives current in the Renaissance culture. The Dutch scholar assembled them in a new original construct matching his intention. They also included an arsenal of the tools of Humanistic exegesis and etymology enabling him, as he thought, to justify that construct in the eyes of the learned. In the first two sections of this paper the dependence of Becanus' scheme from the basic mytho-genic notions which the contemporary culture proposed maintaining certain mythohistoric narratives is explored. All of those notions were connected with a so called Adamic project. It presented a complex of ideas and hermeneutic strategies determined by them and aimed to reconstruct the primordial, or Adamic, language. Adamic was the primordial language belonging to the protoplasts (while at least they remained in a condition of the initial perfection). Not being (just) an artificial, conventionally imposed semiotic system, this language was thought to be directly correspondent to the intelligible structure of the world, for it was either inherently connected with the very essences of natural things or possessed epistemological excellence allowing to reflect these essences in a perfect manner. Also it is ascertained that Becanus assumed a highly negative attitude towards magical-occultist movement within the Adamic project. And it is cleared up that the ambivalent intellectual renown the scholar had was due to defiant originality of his theory with its central thesis that Dutch is a primordial language sensu stricto. In the third section Becanus' etymological practice is analyzed. It was to provide him and his readers with properly linguistic proofs that his cultural and historic scheme was correct. Typically for the Renaissance mytholinguistics, the practice was reduced to a search for elements of the "Adamic" language in words of latter, historic, ones and to demonstration of a non-contingent, organically motivated link conjoining primordial words with their meaning and then with signified things themselves. In order to make easier this double task Becanus and some of his followers resorted to fragmentation of Dutch words into phonosemantic "atoms" assumed to be pristine.
Keywords
Книга Бытия,
скифская теория лингвогенеза,
этимология,
кратилизм,
эзотеризм,
Genesis,
Scythian theory of language origin,
etymology,
cratylism,
esotericismAuthors
Karabykov Anton V. | Omsk State Technical University | meavox@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Лейбниц Г.-В. Сочинения : в 4 т. М. : Мысль, 1983. Т. II. 686 c.
Krop H.A. The Antiquity of the Dutch Language: Renaissance Theories on the Language of Paradise // Narratives of Low Countries History and Culture: Reframing the Past / ed. J. Fenoulhet and L. Gilbert. London : UCL Press, 2016. P. 108-124.
Карабыков А.В. «И нарёк человек имена.»: стратегии воссоздания адамического языка в культуре Ренессанса // Человек. 2014. № 5. С. 114-131.
Goropius Becanus Hermathena // Opera Ioan. Goropii Becani, hactenus in luce non edita. Antwerp : Plantinus, 1580. 237 p.
Августин Блаженный. О граде Божьем. Минск : Харвест ; Москва : АСТ, 2000. 1296 с.
Goropius Becanus Origines antwerpianae, sive Cimmeriorum becceselana novem libros complexa. Antwerp : Plantinus, 1569. 1058 p.
Карабыков А.В. Между «Кратилом» и Каббалой: Проблема возникновения языка в «Вавилонской башне» (1679) Афанасия Кирхера // Вопросы философии. 2015. № 6. С. 154-163.
Бэкон Ф. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1977. Т. I. 566 с.
Локк Дж. Сочинения: в 3 т. М. : Мысль, 1985. Т. I. 621 с.
Del Bello D. Forgotten Paths: Etymology and the Allegorical Mindset. Washington, D.C. : Catholic University of America Press, 2007. 187 p.
Borchardt F.L. Etymology in Tradition and in the Northern Renaissance // Language and the History of Thought / ed. N. Struever. Rochester : The University of Rochester Press, 1995. P. 1-16.
Anderson J.H. Words that matter: Linguistic perception in the English Renaissance. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1996. 340 p.
Aarsleff H. From Locke to Saussure. Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1982. 422 p.
Сорель Ш. Правдивое комическое жизнеописание Франсиона / пер. с фр. Г. Ярхо. М. : Правда, 1990. 592 с.
Карабыков А.В. Трансформация метафизики первозданного языка в ренессансном каб-бализме // Вопросы философии. 2016. № 3. С. 186-197.
Jones W.J. Images of language: six essays on German attitudes to European languages from 1500 to 1800. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999. 297 р.
Metcalf G.J. On Language Diversity and Relationship from Bibliander to Adelung / ed. by T. Van Hal and R. Van Rooy. Amsterdam, Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2013. 181 р.
Travoni M. Western Europe // History of Linguistics. Volume III: Renaissance and Early Modern Linguistics / ed. by Giulio Lepschy. London; New York : Routledge, 2014. P. 2-107.
Considine J. Dictionaries in Early Modern Europe: Lexicography and the Making of Heritage. Cambridge et al. : Cambridge University Press, 2008. 393 p.
Pezron P. The Antiquities of Nations, More Particularly of the Celtae Or Gauls, Taken to be Originally the Same People as Our Ancient Britains / trans. D. Jones. London : Janeway, 1706. 312 p.
Simone R. The Early Modern Period // History of Linguistics. Volume III: Renaissance and Early Modern Linguistics / ed. by G. Lepschy. London; New York : Routledge, 2014. P. 149-236.
Эко У. Поиски совершенного языка в европейской культуре / пер. А. Миролюбовой. СПб. : Александрия, 2007. 423 с.
Naborn R.A. Becanus' Etymological Methods // Voortgang. 1995. № 15. Р. 79-86.
Пиотровский М.Б. Адам // Мифы народов мира : в 2 т. М. : Сов. энциклопедия, 1987. Т. I. С. 39-43.
Marcilio Ficino Opera omnia. Basileae: ex officina Henricpetrina, 1576.
Иосиф Флавий. Иудейские древности: в 2 т. Т. I, кн. 1-12 / пер. Г.Г. Генкеля. М. : АСТ : Ладомир, 2002. 784 c.
Карабыков А.В. Язык Адама, иероглифика египтян и «эмблематическое мировоззрение» Ренессанса // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 1. С. 133-144.
Pierio Valeriano Hieroglyphica, sive de sacris Aegyptiorum literis commentarii, Ioannis Pierii Valeriani Bolzanii Bellunensis. Basileae, 1556. 945 p.
Пьеро Валериано. Иероглифика, или Толкования священных письмён египтян. Посвятительное письмо сиятельнейшему Козимо Медичи / пер. с лат. и комментарии А.В. Карабыкова // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 1. С. 145-153.
Crawforth H. Etymology and the Invention of English in Early Modern Literature. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013. 218 p.
Rothstein M. Etymology, Genealogy, and the Immutability of Origins // Renaissance Quarterly. 1990. № 43 (2). Р. 332-347.
Burke P. Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge et al. : Cambridge University Press, 2004. 210 p.
Olender M. From the Language of Adam to the Pluralism of Babel // Mediterranean Historical Review. 1997. № 12 (2). Р. 51-59.
Maat J. Philosophical Languages in the Seventeenth Century: Dalgarno, Wilkins, Leibniz. Dordrecht : Springer, 2004. 415 p.
Slaughter M. Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1982. 277 p.