Politikalsocialisation as “care of’ in context of cultural-symbolical scenarios of communications

In article political socialisation is considered as a part of processes personal and social “cares of’, representing cultural experts of self-transformation, self-checking and society self-transformation. The given experts in work are presented as the general orientation of the political phenomena, allowing to form and transform the political culture of the person including a set of means of understanding of a society as interconnected the cultural-historical integrity informed on the basis of symbolical means of self-transformation of set the general outlook of individuals. In this plan “the care of’ appears as area of existence and genesis of values political which role is interfaced to reproduction and transformation of forms social “managements of self’, about a live continuum of the purposes and means of human relations. At the same time social “the care of’ appears as a product performative the certificates designing a society under the influence of the changing social situation of the person. Performativnyj character social “cares of’ creates possibilities socioculture designing of the political phenomena, political culture in the course of political socialisation of the person. Thus social “the care of’ occurs in a context of cultural-symbolical scenarios of communications which are caused by “own values’ or rather mobile the unchangeable structures of a social order. In this respect symbolical scenarios of communications create isolation public “cares of’ on certain historical values of society, form it difference, senses and forms of an autonomy and self-changes in world around. Scenarios “the care of’ can be considered cares of as set of symbolical forms of public consciousness. It provides autopoecis communications in society, symbolical connection of communications, a choice of their means, institutional forms. Communications scenarios, expressing symbolical social “will to live”, allow to organise “practice of’ as sets the connected paradigms, actions and forms, values and senses of transformation of society and the person, the general purposeful processes of self-knowledge and society self-transformation. In this respect the above-stated scenarios represent public expectations or the structures necessary for joining of one communications to another. Cultural scenarios of communications represent socioculture expectations concerning ways samoreference societies which express readiness for reproduction and changes, to self-correction of structures of consciousness of society, representing its aspiration to self-change, training, to perception of evolution of culture of a society. In this respect scenarios act as possibilities of existence and training ways autopoecisa the communications, entering into cultural toolkit of the social consciousness providing interrelation, a reconstruction and deconstructions of understanding of the political phenomena.

Keywords

Authors

References