Museum aura in a digital format | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/4

Museum aura in a digital format

In conditions of rough social changes and of ICT of development a museum-temple gives way to modern post-museum. Whether the museum-temple era came to end, or its potential can be demanded? In search of the answer, combining the social-analitical view (Benjamin) with a psychological analysis (Vygotsky), we will address a question of aura which traditionally defined emotional influence of museum exposition. Since moment when Benjamin noted that technical reproduction washes away aura, a scales of high-quality reproduction in network environment grew in thousands times and decisively devaluated sacrality of a museum space. Besides a democratic museum is guided by inquiry of a mass visitor with his specific perception. An ability of museum collections to cause the strongest "power" influence, powerful passions does not raise doubts. However, attempts to find the concrete localization, material traces inducing a mysterious field and defining surprising impact on a viewer do not lead to anything. In that case it is more logical to connect a disappearance of aura with a viewer. Author's creation, museum exhibit "will not take place", without having met the viewer, his response. Art passion, emotional expenditure are provided not with external influence, but by himself viewer, his mental energy and experience. If following Vygotsky behind esthetic signs it can see author's experiences, then a suit of Eskimo and a painting - only certain sign-emotional display of internal insight of the author - of the original. A masterpiece, an exhibit are only a mediator between the viewer and the author. A museum visitor on an exposition uses visual language, reading clear and available graphic signs. However a museum demands not reading of information, but a contemplate, concentrated look lost in rational acceleration. Whether it is possible to revive this look and aura? Digital technologies which were a reason of disappearance of aura give a such hope. ICT technologies can be used not only as an entertainment for a bored tourist. Their potential is more that potential that is demanded in educational, educational programs. Only relying on experience and interests of viewer it is possible to adjust his on meeting with museum, with art. Experience and inquiries of the modern visitor - the network user - most full of are reflected in an array of network data. The analysis of these data (preferences) creates base to find connection of personal tastes and khowledge with those impressions which museum can offer. Similar programming of associations, special virtual assistance can influence perception, initiating interest, bright emotions which leave marks in memory and promote growing. Perhaps, a viewer supported by "emotional" program progress will find aura in museum again.

Download file
Counter downloads: 97

Keywords

aura, museum, information and communication technologies

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Drikker Alexander S.St. Petersburg State Universityasdrikker@mail.ru
Makovetsky Eugene A.St. Petersburg State Universityevmak@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Беньямин В. Произведение искусства в эпоху его технической воспроизводимости // Избранные эссе. М. : Медиум, 1996. С. 15-65.
Маклюэн М. Понимание медиа: внешне расширения человека. М. ; Жуковский : КАНОН-пресс-Ц : Кучково поле, 2003. 464 с.
Vergo P. Introduction // New Museology. London : Reaktion Book, 1989. Р. 1-5.
Hooper-Greenhill E. Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. London : Routledge, 2000. 195 p.
Simon N. The Participatory Museum. 2010. URL: http://www.participatorymuseum.org/pre-face/ (дата обращения: 26.07.2019).
Выготский Л.С. Психология искусства. М. : Искусство, 1968. 572 с.
Разгон А.М. Музейный предмет как исторический источник // Проблемы источниковедения истории СССР и специальных исторических дисциплин: статьи и материалы. М. : Наука, 1984. С. 174-183.
Финягина Н.П. Изучение музейных предметов современного периода в исторических и историко-революционных музеях. М. : Центральный музей Революции СССР, 1978. 72 с.
Шляхтина Л.М., Фокин С.В. Основы музейного дела: учеб. пособие для студентов педагогических и гуманитарных вузов. СПб. : СпецЛит, 2000. 160 с.
Жуковский В.А. Эстетика и критика. М. : Искусство, 1985. 431 с
Станиславский К.С. Работа актера над ролью // Собр. соч.: в 8 т. М. : Искусство, 1957. Т. 4. 477 с.
Дриккер А.С. «Энергетика» художественного воздействия: информационный анализ // Человек. 2006. № 6. С. 21-34.
Эйзенштейн С.М. «Одолжайтесь!» // Собр.соч.: в 6 т. М. : Искусство, 1964. Т. 2. С. 6081.
Гройс Б. Медиаискусство в музее. URL: http://anthropology.ru/ru/texts/groys/mediart.html (дата обращения: 27.08.2019).
Толстой Л.Н. Что такое искусство? // Статьи, письма, дневники. М. : Современник, 1985. 592 с.
Хадсон К. Влиятельные музеи. Новосибирск : Сибирский хронограф, 2001. 194 с.
Cameron D. A Viewpoint: The Museum as a Communications System and Implications for Museum Education // Curator. 1968. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 33-40.
Hooper-Greenhill Е. Museum, Media, Message (Museum Meanings). London; New York : Routledge, 2013. 316 p.
Никишин H.A. «Язык музея» как универсальная моделирующая система музейной деятельности // Музееведение. Проблемы культурной коммуникации в музейной деятельности: сб. науч. тр. М. : НИИ Культуры, 1989. С. 7-15.
Франкфорт Г., Уилсон Дж., Якобсон Т. В преддверии философии. Духовные искания древнего человека. М. : ГРВЛ, 1984. 236 с.
 Museum aura in a digital format | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/4

Museum aura in a digital format | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 412