The Handicrafts Museum as an actual form of museum activity in the second half of the XIX - the first third of the XX centuries (on the example of the Moscow Handicrafts Museum) | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/25

The Handicrafts Museum as an actual form of museum activity in the second half of the XIX - the first third of the XX centuries (on the example of the Moscow Handicrafts Museum)

The development of folk crafts in Russia was closely connected with the formation of handicrafts museums that performed complex tasks of preserving, studying and promoting folk art. The study of their history today is one of the problems that have not yet been sufficiently studied in museology. Handicrafts museums were considered by researchers primarily in the general historical context of the influence of state policy and provincial zemstvos on the development of handicraft industry in Russia. However, the phenomenon of handicrafts museums remains insufficiently studied from the point of view of history and the theory of museum work. The type of the handicrafts museum has not yet been singled out as an actual form of the museum institution of the last quarter of the XIX - the first third of the XX centuries, which spread in several provinces of the Russian Empire. The purpose of the article is to review the main activities of the Moscow Handicrafts Museum -an example of the formation of new types of museums in Russia and their influence on the development of folk crafts in the second half of the 19th century - the first third of the 20th centuries. Moscow Handicrafts Museum opened in 1885. His task was to fully promote the development of folk art and the implementation of handicrafts. One of the main features and goals of creating the Handicrafts Museums in the Russian Empire was the formation of an established system of state patronage over the peasants who were freed from serfdom and promotion of their involvement in the new sector of the economy. The museum staff formed the museum collection, actively participated in organizing the training of folk craftsmen, arranging production workshops, became intermediaries in the art market, and was engaged in active exhibition work around the world, especially at large industrial fairs. In the 1890-1910s, the case started in Moscow spread quickly to almost the whole country. Handicrafts museums immediately arose in several provinces of Russia. One of the program documents of that period was the concept of the development of the Handicrafts Museum, proposed in a report of Sergey Morozov in 1910. Thus, at the beginning of the twentieth century in Moscow, the structure of an effective museum was formed, aimed at systematic work with folk crafts and successfully involving a wide range of partners: artists and scientists, merchants and foreign industrialists. Thanks to the assistance of handicrafts museums in Russia in the late XIX - early XX centuries traditional folk crafts were able to survive and be adequately represented throughout the world. The aesthetic significance of folk art has been recognized. The study of folk art has become an important subject of scientific research. All aspects of the multifaceted history of the formation and development of handicrafts museums and their role in the socio-economic and cultural development of Russia are of great scientific interest and require careful further study.

Download file
Counter downloads: 68

Keywords

Moscow Handycrafts museum, crafts, museology, history of the museum

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Rychkova Ekaterina А.Kizhi State Open Air Museum of History, Architecture and Ethnographyrychkova.info@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Мамонтова Н.Н. К истории художественно-промышленных музеев в России // Научные чтения памяти В.М. Василенко: сб. статей. М., 1998. Вып. 2. 156 с.
Карташова М.В. Кустарно-промышленная политика и ее реализация в последней трети XIX в.: на материалах Нижегородской губернии: дис.. канд. ист. наук. Н. Новгород, 2008. 318 с.
Николаенко В.А. Императорский сельскохозяйственный музей в Санкт-Петербурге и некоторые вопросы аграрной истории России второй половины XIX и начала XX в. : дис. канд. ист. наук. СПб., 2000. 212 с.
Ананьев В.Г. Провинциальные художественные музеи и кустарная промышленность в дискуссиях первой четверти ХХ в. // QUAESTIO ROSSICA / Уральский федеральный университет имени Б.Н. Ельцина. Екатеринбург. 2017. № 1. С. 86-98. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=29093720 (дата обращения: 27.08.2020).
Дорина Е.М. Кустарная промышленность Московской губернии в конце XIX - начале XX века. Проблема капитализации и модернизации: автореф. дис.. канд. ист. наук. Рязань, 2010. 172 с.
Центральный исторический архив г. Москвы (ЦИАМ). Ф. 184. Оп. 4. Д. 301. Л. 2.
Труды комиссии по исследованию кустарной промышленности в России. СПб., 18791888. Т. 1-16.
Голицын Ф. Кустарное дело в России. М. : Тип. В. Ф. Киршбаума, 1904. Т. 1. 256 с.
Рычкова Е.А. Роль Кустарного музея в деятельности земских учебных мастерских московской губернии в конце XIX - начале XX века // Педагогика искусства. 2017. № 4. С. 200-202. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30722000 (дата обращения: 27.08.2020).
Морозов С.Т. Доклад «О постановке Земской губернской организации по содействию кустарной промышленности» на Съезде деятелей по кустарной промышленности, 1910. М. : Тип. Я.Г. Сазонова, 1912. 23 с.
Крапивин В.Г. О деятельности Торгово-промышленного музея кустарных изделий Московского губернского земства. Доклад. Приложение 7-е к докладу по Кустарному отделу. М., 1892. 52 с.
 The Handicrafts Museum as an actual form of museum activity in the second half of the XIX - the first third of the XX centuries (on the example of the Moscow Handicrafts Museum) | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/25

The Handicrafts Museum as an actual form of museum activity in the second half of the XIX - the first third of the XX centuries (on the example of the Moscow Handicrafts Museum) | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2020. № 40. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/40/25

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 412