The issue of contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality in the works of Boris Groys | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/42/1

The issue of contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality in the works of Boris Groys

The authors refer the issue of definition of contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality basing on the research results of a well-known theorist Boris Groys. Analyzing the progress of his ideas, the authors conclude, that the philosopher's considerable contribution to the science is composed of the next phase of the development of the thesis about the art language as the base of contemporaneity construction and of the “natural selection” of contemporary art structures. The latter is not simply reduced to the postmodern “polylogue” variant, but implies a kind of contemporaneity patterns niche and “stabilization”. The patterns naturally tend to become complementary due to simple juxtaposition/ overlay in general time context. According to the authors, this circumstance does not prevent them from being turned by different political forces into locally dominating contemporaneity patterns (as in the case of Gesamkunstwerk Stalin). Contemporary art provides simple experience, that helps to retain the illusion of single and seemingly total contemporaneity. B. Groys leads us to the thought that art provides conditions for generating a significant reflective distance in relation to different social and historical situations. The distance gives an artist the opportunity to consider the reality comprehensively, given the autonomy, through the art language. However, we believe, that the most important philosopher's achievement is not only drawing parallels between cultural and social and historical processes, based on the concept of art strategies influencing the social dynamics. He also managed to approach one of the most significant issues in culture theory and history - the opportunity to define contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality. According to his modernity theory, the origin of contemporaneity is hidden in the avant-garde art manifestation. He interprets the utopic by its nature modernist discourse, applied in art practice, through Nietzscheian will to power as redefining the new age philosophy. This article aims to analyze the progress of the issue of contemporaneity in the works of B. Groys and to explicate the complexity of considering contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality. The authors believe that the thorough study of the phenomenon of total artwork (Gesamtkunstwerk) as a soviet Stalin project and critics' opinion analysis helps to create arguments limiting the opportunity of considering contemporaneity as totality.

Download file
Counter downloads: 20

Keywords

Boris Groys, total work of art, modernism, contemporary art, contemporaneity

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Baboshko Elena Y.National Research Tomsk State Universityelena.baboshko@gmail.com
Galkin Dmitriy V.National Research Tomsk State Universitykulturtsu@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Хабермас Ю. Модерн - незавершенный проект // Политические работы. М., 2005. С. 16-19, 22-28.
Фархатдинов Н.Г. Роберт Уиткин. Разжевывая Клемента Гринберга. Абстракция и два лика модернизма // Социологическое обозрение. 2010. Т. 9, № 2. С. 81-86.
Фурс В.Н. Философия незавершенного модерна Юргена Хабермаса. Минск, 2000.
Малевич К. Собрание сочинений : в 5 т. М. : Гилея, 2004. Т. 5: Произведения разных лет: Статьи. Трактаты. Манифесты и декларации. Проекты. Лекции. Записи и заметки. Поэзия.
Малевич К. Собрание сочинений : в 5 т. М. : Гилея, 2000. Т. 3: Супрематизм. Мир как беспредметность, или Вечный покой: с приложением писем К.С. Малевича к М.О. Гершензону (1918-1924).
Зедльмайр Г. Искусство и истина. О теории и методе истории искусства / пер. с нем. С.С. Ванеяна. М. : Искусствознание, 1999.
Ельшевская Г. История искусства как логическая система: обзор переводов книг классиков зарубежного искусствознания. М. : НЛО, 2002. № 53. С. 28-35.
Тасалов В.И. Ганс Зедльмайр. Дилемма хаоса и порядка в постмодернизме 50-70-х гг. // Искусствознание Запада об искусстве ХХ в. М. : [Б.и.], 1988. С. 43-71.
Колеров М.А. Большой стиль Сталина: Gesamtkunstwerk Alsindustriepalast // Философско-литературный журнал Логос. 2015.Т. 25, № 5 (107). С. 1-32.
Гройс Б. Политика поэтики. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2012.
Гройс Б. Утопия и обмен. М. : Знак, 1993.
Гройс Б. В потоке. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016.
Мизиано В. Gesamtkunstwerk Гройс // Художественный журнал. 2004. № 55. URL: http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/55/28/ (дата обращения: 20.06.2018).
Осминкин Р.С. Политики раннесоветского авангарда: от «беспредметности» к «жизне-строению» // Вестник культуры и искусств. 2016. № 4 (48). С. 111-117.
Гройс Б. Gesamtkunstwerk Сталин. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013.
Гройс Б. Товарищи времени // Художественный журнал. 2011. № 81. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/16/article/218 (дата обращения: 15.07.2020).
Калинеску М. Идея современности // Художественный журнал. 2016. № 98 URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/31/article/541 (дата обращения: 03.10.2018).
Гройс Б. Топология современного искусства // Художественный журнал. 2006. № 61/62. URL: http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/36/article/696 (дата обращения: 5.10.2018).
Гройс Б. Логика равноправия // Художественный журнал. 2005. № 58-59. URL: http:// http://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/30/article/508 (дата обращения: 10.04.2021)
 The issue of contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality in the works of Boris Groys | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/42/1

The issue of contemporaneity as cultural and historical totality in the works of Boris Groys | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 42. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/42/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 425