Globalization theory in the context of modern cultural transformation | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/44/4

Globalization theory in the context of modern cultural transformation

The paper aims to present two paradigms of theory of globalization: traditional and novel. First paradigm includes globalizations concepts concerned with the investigation of the material aspect of the process of globalization. Within the boundaries of this paradigm various concepts of globalization can be fit into a conceptual frame which includes the following main concept: historical, geopolitical, economic, social, legal, political globalization. Historically, the process of globalization is connected with the evolution of the global world community. This consideration bring to the Global Enlightenment problem, which excel narrow interpretation of the Classical Enlightenment of the 18 C. -mainly inspired by national and historical narratives. Social globalizations concepts investigate various trends of social world evolution: westernization, colonization, modernization, post-modernization, running behind development. In contemporary social theory several basic elements of globalization are indentified: deterritorialization: interconnectedness across existing geographical and political borders: speed of velocity of social activity, evaluation of globalization as a relatively long-term process, understanding of globalization as multi-pronged process. Legal concepts of globalization investigate the prospect of “good society” and “responsible community” formation within the boundaries of the globalization process. Political theorists have been busy addressing the normative implication of globalization. Globalization is discussed in debates between cosmopolitans and communitarians. At whole, first paradigm of the globalization theory is oriented on investigation mainly material aspect of modern globalization process: economical, geopolitical, social, etc. The second paradigm of globalization theory is concerned with investigation of the recent process of cultural development: informatization, digitalization, net culture, virtual culture, additional reality, diversity, multicultural trends of development, hybridity, hybrid geopolitics. Multicultural concepts of globalization, based on the recognition of the world diversity, are popular because of their non-repressive and tolerant forms. Virtual reality becomes dominant phenomena in recent culture, creating the “third nature” -world of virtual phenomena created by synthesis of intelligence and high technologies. This third nature exists side by side with two traditional worlds: nature and culture (the second nature, in terms of F. Schelling). Informatization, digitalization, net structures, virtual and additional reality lead to great changes of existence of human being. Human being exists in two dimensions: real and virtual with domination of virtual. Virtual, informational, net structures transform modern globalization process. Global nets lead to realization of human freedom as free choice of life style, which remains open. In conclusion authors stress the fact of existing of two paradigm in theory of globalization: traditional, oriented on investigation of material phenomena (historical, geopolitics, economic, social, etc. concepts) and novel oriented of analysis of immaterial phenomena (virtual, digital, hybrid, multicultural, informational, net, etc.).

Download file
Counter downloads: 41

Keywords

globalization, global culture, virtual culture, informational, net culture

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Korobeynikova Larisa A.National Research Tomsk State Universitylarisa_korobeynikova@rambler.ru
Vodopiyanova Elena V.Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciencesveritas41@yandex.ru
Всего: 2

References

Федотова В.Г. Российское развитие в условиях глобализации // Философские науки. 2001. № 1.
Хомский Н. Прибыль на людях. М. : Праксис, 2002.
Donna Gabaccia. A Long Atlantic in a Wider World // Atlantic Studies. Literary, Cultural and Historical Perspectives. 2004. Vol. 1, № 1.
Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York : Basik Books, A Division Collins Publishers, 1997.
Globalization, Stanford Encyclopedia, plato.Stanford.edu/entries/globalization/
Rizvi F. Democracy and Education after September 11 // Globalization, Societies and Education. 2003. Vol. 1, № 1.
Held D. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1995.
Habermas J. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. MIT Press, 1999.
Frost M. Can Dispersed Practices be Held Ethically Accountable // Global Society. January 2004. Vol. 18, № 1.
Remapping Global Politics. History's Revenge and Future Shock. Val.H. Ferguson, Rutgers University, New Jersey and Richard W. Mansbach, Iowa State University. 2004. 380 p.
Brown C. Do Great Powers Have Great Responsibilities? Great Power and Moral Agency// Global Society. Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations. January 2002. Vol. 8, № 1.
America Alone. The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order. Stefan Halper, University of Cambrige, and Jonathan Clarke, Cato University. Washington D.C., 2004. 382 p.
Vertovec S. Transnationalism. New York : Routledge, 2010.
Rawls D. Theory of Justice. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1971. 560 p.
Kymlicka W. Multicaltural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995. 280 p.
Долгих М.Н. Дизайн в культуре сетевого общества: интерактивная природа и виртуальная жизнь : автореф. дис.. канд. филос. наук. Томск, 2015. 16 c.
Roberts A., Lamp N. Six faces of globalization. Harvard : Harvard University Press, 2020. 400 p.
Sandel M. The tyranny of merit. London : Penguin, 2020.
 Globalization theory in the context of modern cultural transformation | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/44/4

Globalization theory in the context of modern cultural transformation | Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History. 2021. № 44. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/44/4

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 699