Missions héliographiques: history and myth. Part 1
The photographic project of the Missions Heliographiques can be called one of the most specific phenomena in the history of photography. It is customary to evaluate it as a system associated with the fixation and protection of historical monuments and, at the same time, as a material correlated with the development of a new visual program and a new visual mythology. Formed on the platform of the Commission for the Protection of Monuments and remaining one of the examples of early photography, the pictorial project of the Missions Heliographiques, at the same time, became a model of a new visual ideology and a marker of a new artistic practice. The project of the Missions Heliographiques articulated the pictorial mythology of photography, indicated the possibility of the manifest and latent existence of the frame. The Missions Heliographiques discovered the paradoxical possibility of the presence in photography of the invisible, illusory and hidden. The text examines the historical aspects, as well as the main directions that are associated with its activities. The research strategy of this work is focused on two main directions. The first is the presentation of factual material related to the activities of the Missions Heliographiques: despite the apparent abundance of material, its activities have been studied fragmentarily. The second research vector is the visual program and the ideological system of images. The dynamics of the visual practice of the Missions Heliographiques and the ideological and visual standard associated with it are considered. The article considers the history of the development of the pictorial narrative, formed under the influence of the Missions Heliographiques. The purpose of this article is to identify the main historical regulations and articulate the basic meaningful concepts related to the the Missions Heliographiques. The article identifies three main vectors of research. The first is the position of the Heliographic Mission in the system of official institutions for the protection of monuments and photographic societies. The second is the position of the Heliographic Mission in the system of architectural photography. The third is the study of the visual practice of the Heliographic mission and the formation of an ideological and visual standard associated with it. The first part of the article deals with the main historical and institutional aspects related to the formation of the Heliographic mission. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
Missions Heliographiques,
architectural photography,
city photography,
monument protection,
Gustave Le Grey,
Hippolyte Bayard,
Henri Le Sec,
Edouard Baldu,
Auguste MestralAuthors
| Vasilyeva Ekaterina V. | St. Petersburg State University | ev100500@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Васильева Е. Город и Тень. Образ города в художественной фотографии XIX-XX веков. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. 280 c.
Mondenard A. La Mission heliographique: Cinq photographes parcourent la France en 1851. Paris: Monum, Editions du patrimoine, 2002. 320 p.
Krauss R. Photography's Discursive Spaces: Landscape/View // Art Journal. 1982. Vol. 42, № 4. The Crisis in the Discipline (Winter). P. 311-319.
Rouille A. La Photographie: entre document et art contemporain. Paris: Gallimard, 2005. 704 p.
Васильева Е. Ранняя городская фотография: к проблеме иконографии пространства // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2019. № 4 (37). С. 65-86.
Mondenard A. La Mission heliographique: mythe et histoire // Etudes photographiques. 2 Mai 1997. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/etudesphotographiques/127 (accessed: 10.07.2023).
Marbot B. A l'origine de la photographie, le calotype au passe et au present. Paris: Bibliotheque nationale, 1979.
Marbot B. After Daguerre: Masterworks of French Photography (1848-1900) from the Bibliotheque Nationale. New York: MOMA, 1980. 187 p.
Lecuyer R. Histoire de la photographie. Paris: SNEP-Illustration, 1945. 455 p.
Gernsheim A., Gernsheim H. The History of Photography from the Earliest Use of the Camera Obscura in the Eleventh Century up to 1914. Londres; New York; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1955. 395 p.
Newhall B. The History of Photography: From 1839 to the Present. New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1937. 240 p.
Christ Y., Neagu P. et al. La Mission heliographique, photographies de 1851. Paris: Inspection Gelnelrale des Museles Classels et Controlels, 1980. 220 p.
Васильева Е. 36 эссе о фотографах. СПб.: Пальмира, 2022. 255 с.
Степанов М. Воображение фотографии // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2022. № 4 (49). С. 148-151.
Berce F. Des monuments historiques au patrimoine du XVIIIe siecle a nos jours, ou "Les egarements du creur et de l'esprit". Paris: Flammarion, 2000. 225 p.
Auduc A. Le budget des Monuments historiques 1830-1920: les moyens d'une politique de protection // Livraisons d'histoire de l'architecture, 1er semester. 2002. № 3. P. 75-102.
Choay F. L'Allegorie du patrimoine. Paris: Ed. du Seuil, 1992. 273 p.
Гройс Б. О Новом // Утопия и обмен. М.: Знак, 1993. С. 113-244.
Васильева Е. Национальная романтика и интернациональный стиль: к проблеме идентичности в системе финского дизайна // Человек. Культура. Образование. 2020. № 3 (37). С. 5772.
Benjamin W. L'reuvre d'art a l'epoque de sa reproduction mecanisee (Das Kunstwerk im Zeit-alter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit) // Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung. 1936. № 5, Heft 1. S. 40-66.
Даниэль С. Картина классической эпохи (Проблема композиции в западноевропейской живописи XVII века). М.: Искусство, 1986. 220 р.
Васильева Е. Фотография и внелогическая форма. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2019. 312 с.
Foucault M. L'Archeologie du savoir. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1969. 288 p.
Trahndorff K.F.E. Asthetik oder Lehre von Weltanschauung und Kunst. 2 Bde. Berlin: Maurer, 1827.
Bergande W. The creative destruction of the total work of art. From Hegel to Wagner and beyond // The death and life of the total work of art / eds. C.Ruhl, C. Dahne, H. Rixt. Berlin: Jovis, 2014. P. 128-145.
Krejci H., Arco A., Steinbrugge B. Utopia Gesamtkunstwerk. Koln: Verlag der Buchhand-lung Walther Konig, 2012. 242 p.
Szeemann H. Der Hang zum Gesamtkunstwerk. Europaische Utopien seit 1800. Ausstel-lungs-Katalog. Zurich: Kunsthaus, 1983. 511 p.
Plata M. de la, Diaz A., Cruz F. Between Le Duc and Merimee. Talking about Vezelay // Structures and Architecture: Concepts, Applications and Challenges. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2013. P. 1972-1979.
Bresc-Bautier G., Chancel-Bardelot B. Un musee revolutionaire: le musee des Monuments fran9ais d'Alexandre Lenoir. Paris: Louvre editions, 2016. 384 p.
Richter M. Tocqueville and Guizot on democracy: from a type of society to a political regime // History of European Ideas. 2004. №" 30. P. 61-82.
Darcos X. Prosper Merimee. Paris: Flammarion, 1998. 544 p.
Васильева Е. Фотография: к проблеме вещи // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Искусствоведение. 2022. Т. 12, № 2. С. 275-294.
