Soviet Science Policy in the Years of the 'Late Stalinism' (second half of 1940s - beginning of 1950s): Markers and Metamorphoses
After the end of the WWII science policy as a system set of goals and tasks directed on utilisation of science products for implementing state priorities, and actions focused on their achievement was de facto missing in the country with the exception of key defence tasks where application of research was more systematic. Science and technology development was determined by a combination of specific branch politics which were often based on different conceptual platforms and did not have a fundamental science background. Basic research, contrary to equipment production and technology, did not belong to the state priorities up to the middle of 1950s. Meanwhile, the analysis of the political process and existing practices allows outlining some markers of science 'proto-policy'. Three elements/ aspects are basically used for structuring such an analysis - these are economic, ideological and organisational aspects. After the end of the war changes in the economic elements of science policy included some increase of funding and, specifically, substantial rise of salaries of scientists. In addition to that, the principle of overwhelming state planning was extended to science and technology. Ideological aspects of science 'proto-policy' fully reflected contradictions and conflicts of the epoch and negatively impacted the sphere of science. Ideological campaigns hampered the development of science, distorted the natural logics of evolution of knowledge, changed psychological climate and atmosphere in the scientific community and stimulated penetration of bureaucratic principles of management to science. In organisational respect science was not yet considered as an integrated subject of management and that was reflected in the administration structure since there was not a single state body responsible for research. In the meantime, substantial transformations in organization of military science started as early as in the years of the WWII. They were based on change of accents referring to science in favour of setting up there a full cycle 'research-equipment-technology-production' which later impacted both military and civilian sectors of economics. The experience of R&D coordination in the sphere of military technology, although accessible to a very limited number of people, was very meaningful for the development of science and technology as a whole. Evidently, it demonstrated the necessity of introduction of a single science and technology cycle and elaboration of not merely a technological policy, but rather of a science and technology policy for the solution of the most important military and economic tasks. This, however, became a peculiarity of the next historical period.
Keywords
советская научная политика,
управление наукой,
сталинизм,
Soviet science policy,
management of science,
StalinismAuthors
Vodichev Evgeny G. | Novosibirsk State Technical University and Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation) | odichev@mail.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Гайдар Е.Т. Долгое время. Россия в мире: очерки экономической истории. 3-е изд. М., 2005.
Анчишкин А.И. Наука. Техника. Экономика. М., 1989.
Stuart Leslie W. The Cold War and American Science. The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. N.Y. : Columbia University Press, 1993.
Рэнд К. Кембридж - научно-технический центр США. М., 1968.
Козлов Б.И. Академия наук СССР и индустриализация России. Очерк социальной истории. 1925-1963. М., 2003.
Безбородов А.Б. Власть и научно-техническая политика в СССР середины 50-х - середины 90-х гг. М., 1997.
Дуженков В.И. Проблемы организации науки (региональные аспекты). М., 1978.
КПСС в резолюциях и решениях съездов, конференций и пленумов ЦК. М., 1976. Т. 6.
9. Вестник АН СССР. 1946. № 2.
Артемов Е. Т. Научно-техническая политика в советской модели позднеиндустриализационной модернизации. М. : РОССПЭН, 2006.
Журавель В.А. Технологии Третьего рейха на службе СССР // История науки и техники. 2002. № 5. С. 53-63.
Захаров В.В. Научно-технический трансферт из Германии в СССР в 1945-1949 гг. URL: http://www.statearchive.ru/assets/files/ Svag_nauka/02.pdf, свободный.
Козлов Б.И. Академия наук СССР и индустриализация России: Очерк социальной истории 1925-1963. М., 2003.
Turkevich John. Soviet Science Policy Formulation // Thomas J.R. and Kruse-Vaucienne U.M., eds. Soviet Science and Technology: Domestic and Foreign Perspectives. Washington, D.C. : National Science Foundation, 1977.
Thomas John R. A Current Assessment of Soviet Science // Thomas J.R. and Kruse-Vaucienne U.M., eds. Soviet Science and Technology.
Holloway David. Soviet Military R&D: Managing the «Research - Production Cycle» // Thomas J.R. and Kruse-Vaucienne U.M., eds. Soviet Sci ence and Technology.
Создание первой советской ядерной бомбы. М., 1995.
Советский атомный проект. Конец атомной монополии. Как это было. Нижний Новгород - Арзамас-16, 1995.
Лебедев В.Э. Научно-техническая политика региона: опыт формирования и реализации (1956-1985 гг.). Свердловск, 1991.
Гвишиани Д.М. Социальная роль науки и политика государства в области науки // Социологические проблемы науки. М., 1974.
21. Правда. 1946. 7 марта.
Зезина М.Р. Материальное стимулирование научного труда в СССР. 1945-1985 // Вестник Российской Академии наук. 1997. Т. 67. № 1.
Наука и кризисы (историко-сравнительные очерки) / ред.-сост. Э.И. Колчинский. СПб., 2003.
Балакин В. С. Отечественная наука в 50-е - серед. 70-х гг. XX в. (Опыт изучения социокультурных проблем). Челябинск, 1997.
Graham Loren R. Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. Vintage Books. A Division of Random House, N.Y.
Есаков В.Д. Мифы и жизнь // Наука и жизнь. 1991. № 11.
Кожевников А.Б. Игры сталинской демократии и идеологические дискуссии в советской науке: 1917-1952 гг. // Вопросы истории естествознания и техники. 1997. № 4.
Сойфер В.Н. Власть и наука. (Разгром коммунистами генетики в СССР). М., 2002.
Paul R. Josephson. Totalitarian Science and Technology. Second Edition. New York, Humanity Books, 2005.
Есаков В.Д. Мифы и жизнь // Наука и жизнь. 1991. № 11.
Paul R. Josephson. Physics and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford. 1991.
Российский государственный архив новейшей истории (РГАНИ). Ф. 4. Оп. 9. Д. 647.
33. РГАНИ. Ф. 4. Оп. 9. Д. 22.
Академия наук в решениях Политбюро ЦК РКП (б)-ВКП (б)-КПСС. 1922-1991/ 1922-1952. М., 2000.
Аксенов А.С. Апогей сталинизма: послевоенная пирамида власти // Вопросы истории КПСС. 1990. № 1.
Korol A. Soviet Research and Development: Its Organization, Personnel and Funds. Cambridge, Mass. 1965.
Водичев Е.Г. Исследовательский университет: общепринятые концепты и российские ретроспекции // Личность. Культура. Общество : сб. науч. ст. Новосибирск, 2010.
ЩукаА.А. Физтех и физтехи. 3-е изд., пер. и доп. М., 2010. URL: http://museum.phystech.edu, свободный.
WEB-Музей МФТИ «Система физтеха». URL: http://museum.phystech.edu/books/book-museum/authors.html, свободный.
Пыстина Л.И. Проблемы изучения форм связей науки с производством в послевоенный период // Социально-исторический аспект организации науки в Сибири. Новосибирск, 1989.
Беляев Е.А. КПСС и организация науки в СССР. М., 1982.
Несмеянов А.Н. На качелях XX века. М., 1999.