The specificity of Trajan's way to power | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2015. № 4 (36).

The specificity of Trajan's way to power

The author of the article explores the peculiarities of Trajan's way to power considering the achievements of the contemporary historiography. The period of AD 96-100 from the assassination of Domitian to the rule of Nerva and the first years of Trajan's power is under analysis. The author examines such issues as Trajan's origin, the adoption of Trajan by Nerva, the reasons of Nerva's choice of the heir, the possible rivals of Trajan and legitimization of Trajan's power. Trajan who was born in Italica in Spain became the first Roman emperor of the provincial origin. According to A. Canto and contrary to the common version that the ancestors of Trajan came to Italica from Umbria in the III-d century BC (R. Syme, J. Bennett and others), Trajan could have been pure Spaniard by birth. Trajan was the first successful ruler among the Roman emperors who was adopted having no family relations with the adoptive father (Piso adopted by Galba in AD 69 was also not a relative of the latter, but he was killed in some days after adoption). Nerva being old and childless had still relatives living, so his choice of Trajan must have been done under the influence of the certain group of the senators. All the modern scholars (W. Eck, J. Grainger, K. Strobel and others) admit that there were candidates to power besides Trajan, P. Cornelius Nigrinus Curiatius Maternus especially. The main result of the succession crisis of AD 96-99 was that the civil war was avoided. The Roman aristocracy apparently did not want the events of AD 69 to be repeated. Trajan's position as a governor of the Upper Germania where he commanded the large army was possibly a guarantee against war. It is also peculiar that Trajan continued staying in Germania while the ceremony of his adoption by Nerva took place in Rome in October 97. Moreover even after Nerva's death in January 98 Trajan didn't haste with arriving to Rome and delayed it up to the end of 99. Taking into account all the specificity of Trajan's way to power the new emperor had to legitimize it. In 97 - 98 he got all the necessary titles that gave him powers and authority. The role of the official ideology in legitimization was also significant. The concept of Trajan as the best ruler (optimus princeps), vice-regent of Jupiter and parent to citizens began to be developed by Pliny no later than in 97 and was fully set forth in "Panegyricus" in 100. For Nerva and for the Roman society in the whole the oracle and some omens given to Trajan (omina imperii) could also have been important as justification of Trajan's coming to power.

Download file
Counter downloads: 345

Keywords

путь Траяна к власти, адопция, идеология Траяна, Trajan's way to power, adoption, Trajanic ideology

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Danilova Valeria Yu.Vladimir State Universityfasikcat@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Strobel K. Kaiser Traian. Eine Epoche der Weltgeschichte. Regensburg : Friedrich Pustet Verlag, 2010. 479 p.
Dio Cassius. Dio's Roman History with an Engl. / transl. by E. Cary. Cambridge-London : Harvard University Press, 1982. Vol. 8.
Aurelius Victor Sextus. Sexti Aurelii Victoris Historia Romana. Ex recensione Ioannis Friderici Gruneri. Erlangae, 1787.
Евтропий. Бревиарий от основания Города / пер. с лат. Д.В. Кареева и Л.А. Самуткиной ; отв. ред. И.В. Кривушин. СПб., 2001. 305 с.
Syme R. Tacitus. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1958. 2 vols. 856 p.
Крист К. История времен римских императоров от Августа до Константина : в 2 т. Ростов-на-Дону, 1997. Т. 1. 574 с.
Bennet J. Trajan, Optimus Princeps. A Life and Times. London-New York : Routledge, 2006. 317 p.
Grainger J. Nerva and the Roman succession crisis of AD 96-99. London; New York : Routledge, 2004. 162 p.
Canto A. Las raices beticas de Trajano: los Traii de la Italica turdetana, y otras novedades sobre su familia. Sevilla : rd editores, 2003. 84 p.
Plinius. Letters and Panegyricus with an Engl. / transl. by B. Radice. Cambridge-London, 1975. Vol. 1-2.
Tacitus Cornelius. P. Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt / еd. E. Koestermann. Lipsiae, 1950-1964. Vol. 2. Fasc. 1-2.
SpeidelM.A. Bellicosissimus Princeps // NUnnerich-Asmuss A. (Hrsg.). Traian. Ein Kaiser der Superlative am Beginn einer Umbruchszeit? Mainz a. R. : Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 2002. S. 23-40.
Migliorati G. L'idea di guerra nella propaganda di Traiano // Il pensiero sulla guerra nel mondo antico. Milano, 2001. P. 225-241.
Eck W. Traian - Der Weg zum Kaisertum // NUnnerich-Asmuss A. (Hrsg.). Traian. Ein Kaiser der Superlative am Beginn einer Umbruchszeit? Mainz a. R. : Verlag Philipp von Zabern, 2002. S. 7-20.
Blazquez J.-M. Trajano. Madrid : Ariel, 2003. 309 p.
Козловская В.И. Рец. на кн.: J.-M. Blazquez. Trajano. Madrid, 2003 // Вестник древней истории. 2005. № 2. С. 187-194.
Cramer F.M. Astrology in Roman Law and Politics. Philadelphia : American Philosophical Society, 1954. 291 p.
Montero S. Trajano y la adivinacion: prodigios, oraculos y apocaliptica en el Imperio Romano (98-117 d.C.). Madrid : Servicio de publicaciones Universidad Complutense, 2000. 187 p.
Strobel K. Die Donaukriege Domitians. Bonn : Rudolf Habelt, 1989.
Strack P.L. Untersuchungen zur romischen Reichspragung des zweiten Jahrhundrets. Vol. 1. Stuttgart, W. Kohlhammer, 1931. 308 s.
Mattingly H. Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum. Vol. 3. London : British Museum, 1936. 606 p.
Абрамзон М.Г. Монеты как средство пропаганды официальной политики Римской империи. М. : ИА РАН, 1995. 656 с.
Seelentag G. Taten und Tugenden Traians. Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat. Stuttgart : Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004 (Hermes Einzelscgriften, Heft 91). 556 p.
 The specificity of Trajan's way to power | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2015. № 4 (36).

The specificity of Trajan's way to power | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2015. № 4 (36).

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 4418