What can iron slag tell an archaeologist?
The article is devoted to the archaeological iron slag. One of the most serious problems in russian archaeometallurgy is that iron slags have been ignored by russian archaeologists as a source of information. Russian researchers are too ready to draw conclusions about the function of the furnace (smelting or smithing), but the lack of knowledge about slag typology leads to confusing smelting and smithing waste, so many conclusions are no proof. Most russian articles don't contain the essential data such as: archaeological context, amount and weight of discovered slags, typology of slags, chemical composition etc. Unfortunately, many slags are thrown out in the field and are not included in the archaeological assemblage. For these reasons, purpose of the article is describe basic scientific knowledges which are "encrypted" in the archaeological slag. During the work the authors came to the following conclusions. Firstly, iron slags can be treated as reliable indicators of existing of iron smelting or smithing process on archaeological site. Slags prove ironmaking much better, than finds of iron artifacts or even blooms, because both iron tools and blooms theoretically could be imported while importing of slag on settlement is unlikely and senselessly. Secondly, the investigation of slag always begins in the field, therefore individual documentation of archaeometallurgical residues is preferred, because it helps identify the concentration of iron production on the site and date remains in some cases. Thirdly, the amount and weight of the discovered slags is also important, because it allows to determine the intensity of ironmaking and reconstruction the role of iron production in economy of ancient and medieval people. Fourthly, the slag typology plays an important role in the study of ancient metallurgy. There are different types of slag. Each of them represents a certain stage of iron production cycle (smelting and smithing). In some cases morphology of smelting slag can help in the reconstruction of the shapes and dimensions of destroyed furnaces and also can indicate a type of furnace, for example, slag blocks and tap slags are formed in different types of furnaces. Some slags allows to know about smithing operation. Thus, spheroid hammerscale can indicate welding technologies, and biggest concentration of hammerscale flakes in excavation area provide us with information on the exact location of the anvil. Finally, chemical and mineralogical composition may reflect a quality of produced iron and indicate iron ore source for ancient and medieval metallurgists.
Keywords
археометаллургия,
археологический шлак,
производство железа,
Archaeometallurgy,
archaeological slag,
ironmakingAuthors
Vodyasov Eugene V. | Tomsk State University | vodiasov_ev@mail.ru |
Zaitceva Olga V. | Tomsk State University | snori76@mail.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Borovsky T., Kijac J., Bul'kol B., Domovec M., Havran J. The influence of slag composition on the distribution of manganese between slag and metal in the electric furnace // Acta Metallurgica Slovaca. 2012. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 28-33.
Charlton M.F., Crew P., Rehren T., Shennan S.J. Measuring variation in iron smelting slags: an empirical evaluation of group-identification pro cedures // The World of Iron. London : Archetype Publications, 2013. P. 421-430.
Cleere H. Twenty years of bloomery studies in Britain // Archaeometallurgy of iron. Prague, 1989. P. 191-213.
Clough R.E. Iron: aspects of the industry during the Iron Age and Romano-British periods. Doctoral thesis, University of London, 1986. 303 p.
Crew P., Salter C.J. Currency Bars with Welded Tips // Bloomery Ironmaking during 2000 years: Seminar in Budalen. Volume III. Trondheim : University of Trondheim, 1991. P. 11-30.
Crew P. CaO enhancement in slags: the influence of fluxing or fuel ash? // Early Ironworking in Europe II conference, Plas Tan y Bwlch. 2007. P. 50- 52.
Crew P. Twenty-five years of bloomery experiments: perspectives and prospects // Accidental and Experimental Archaeometallurgy, HMS Occa sional Publication No. 7. London, 2013. P. 27-54.
Dungworth D., Wilkes R. An investigation of hammerscale // Research Departament Report. Series no 26, 2007. 36 p.
Freestone I.C. Melting points and viscosities of ancient slags : a contribution to the discussion // The journal of the historical metallurgy society. Oxford, 1988. Vol. 22. P. 49-52.
Gomori Janos. The Hungarian bloomeries // Archaeometallurgy of iron 1967-1987. Prague, 1989. P. 125-138.
Hedges R.E.M., Salter C.J. Source determination of iron currency bars through analysis of the slag inclusion // Archaeometry. Oxford. Vol. 21. Part 2. P. 161-177.
Ingoglia C., Triscari M., Sabatino G. Archaeometallurgy in Messina: Iron slag from a dig at block P, laboratory analyses and interpretation // Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry. 2008. Vol. 8, No. 1. P. 49-60.
McDonnell J.G. Smelting and smithing slags. Ancient monuments laboratory. Report 3970, 1982. 17 p.
McDonnell J.G. Tap slags and hearth bottoms or how to identify slags // Current archaeology. 1983. No. 86. P. 81-83.
McDonell J.G. A model for the formation of smithing slags // Materialy archeologiczne XXVI. Krakow, 1991. P. 23-28.
Miller D., Boeyens J., Kusel M. Metallurgical analyses of slags, ores and metal artefacts from archaeological sites in the north-west province and northern Transvaal // South African archaeological bulletin. Cape Town, 1995. Vol. 50. P. 39-46.
Mortimer C. Chemical analysis of metalwork and metalworking debris. The historical Metallurgy society: Archaeological datasheet № 12. 1995. URL: http://www.hist-met.org/datasheets.html, free (accessed date: 19.02.2017).
Paynter S., Blakelock E., Hatton G. Bloomery iron smelting - experimentation and archaeology // Plas Tan y Bwlch. Snowdonia National park. Reseacrh report series 25. 2012. 52 p.
Piaskowski J. Correlation between the phosphorus content in iron ore or slag and that in bloomery iron // Archaeologia Polona. Wroclaw ; War-szawa ; Krakow, 1965. Vol. VIII. P. 83-103.
Piaskowski J. Classification of the strictures of slag inclusions in early objects made of bloomery iron // Archaeologia Polona. Wroclaw ; War-szawa ; Krakow ; Gdansk, 1976. Vol. XVII. P. 139-149.
Pleiner R. Iron in Archaeology: The European Bloomery Smelters. Archeologicky listav AVCR, 2000. 400 p.
Rosenqvist Anna M. Report on chemical and mineralogical analyses of Norwegian ores, slags and iron // Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urge-schichte, Fruhgeschichte und Mittelalterarchaologie. 1983. Band 40. P. 129-137.
Serneels V., Crew P. Ore-slag relationships from experimentally smelted bog-iron ore // Early Ironworking in Europe, archaeology and experiment. International Conference Plas Tan y Bwlch. 1997. P. 78-82.
Sperl G. Comparative studies in early iron slags // Bergund Huttenmannische Monatshefte (124). 1979. P. 79-84.
Tylecote R.F. Metallurgy in archaeology. London : Edward Arnold (Publishers) LTD, 1962. 387 p.
Wang Q., Crew P. Three ores, three irons, three knives // The World of Iron. London : Archetype Publications, 2013. P. 393-401.
Водясов Е.В., Гусев А.В. Древнейшие свидетельства освоения человеком железа в Нижнем Приобье (по материалам раскопок Усть-Полуя в 2010-2012 гг.) // Вестник археологии, антропологии и этнографии. 2016. № 4 (35). С. 58-68.
Водясов Е.В., Зайцева О.В. Металлургический шлак как археологический источник: проблемы и перспективы изучения // Культура как система в историческом контексте: Опыт Западно-Сибирских археолого-этнографических совещаний : материалы XV Междунар. Зап.-Сиб. археол.-этнограф. конф. Томск : Аграф-Пресс, 2010. С. 400-403.
Зиняков Н.М. История черной металлургии и кузнечного ремесла древнего Алтая. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1988. 276 с.
Кожевников Н.О. Шлаки и другие материальные свидетельства древней металлургии железа // Известия Лаборатории древних технологий ИрГТУ. Иркутск, 2004. Вып. 2. С. 188-192.
Коноваленко С.И., Асочакова Е.М., Барсуков Е.В., Зайцева О.В. Вещественный состав шлаков и руд железоделательного производства на территории Шайтанского комплекса средневековых археологических памятников в Томском Приобье // Минералогия техногенеза-2010. Миасс : Имин УрО РАН, 2010. С. 196-206.
Наумов А.Н. Черная металлургия и железообработка на сельских памятниках Куликова поля в конце XII - третьей четверти XIV вв. Тула : Гос. музей-заповедник «Куликово поле», 2008. 255 с.
Рындина Н.В. Результаты петрографического и спектрального исследования руды и шлаков с поселения Оймак // Археология Северной и Центральной Азии. Новосибирск : Наука, 1975. С. 114-118.
Сунчугашев Я.И. Древняя металлургия Хакасии (эпоха железа). Новосибирск : Наука, 1979. 191 с.