Evolution of socio-political and academic discussions in the US at the turn of the 20th and 21 st centuries on granting China the "most favored nation" (MFN) regime | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. № 53. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/53/5

Evolution of socio-political and academic discussions in the US at the turn of the 20th and 21 st centuries on granting China the "most favored nation" (MFN) regime

The author focuses on the process of granting the most-favored-nation treatment (MFN) regime to China from the US in the field of financial and economic relations between the two countries at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. The purpose of the article is to trace the evolution of this process from the moment of establishment of diplomatic relations between the USA and the PRC in 1979 and before the ratification of the US-China trade treaty by the US Congress in 2001. In this connection, the article deals with a number of tasks connected with the discussions between neo-liberals and neoconservatives -supporters and opponents of granting the "most favored nation" regime in American ruling and academic circles. At the same time, the factors of both external and internal influences are revealed that led to the transition from the annual extension of the "most favored nation" regime to China, approved by the Congress during the years of the republican administration headed by George W. Bush, and until the regime was granted on a permanent and unconditional basis in the years of Administration of Democrats led by B. Clinton. All the 1990s business associations, unlike the American lawmakers and the White House administration, showed little activity on the issue of granting China MFN on an ongoing basis. After the events in Tiananmen Square, the American business community for a long time feared that the Chinese authorities could turn off the path of reform and again "shut down" their country. Thus, the process of granting the "most favored nation" regime to China from the US at the turn of the 20th-21st centuries occurred in two stages. At the first stage (the late 1980s and the first half of the 1990s), the temporary state of the MFN was the subject of heated debates in American ruling and academic circles related to the search for instruments of pressure on Beijing from Washington on the widest range of political and territorial problems in the East Asian region. At the second stage (1995-2001), the financial-economic and trade relations between the two countries depoliticized, which led to the provision of China with a permanent and unconditional MFN as the basis of the US-China trade treaty (1999). In 2001, this treaty was ratified by the US Congress, which reduced the intensity of sociopolitical and academic discussions in the United States around this issue.

Download file
Counter downloads: 202

Keywords

неолибералы, неоконсерваторы, режим «наибольшего благоприятствования» (РНБ), neo-liberals, neoconservatives, most-favored-nation treatment (MFN)

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Sokolov Nikolay N.Tomsk State Universitysokolov.nsokolov@yandex.ru
Всего: 1

References

Trade in Goods (Imports, Exports and Trade Balance) with China // U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division, Data Dissemination Branch. URL: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html; http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c0015.html
Keohane R., Nye J. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little Brown, 1977. 273 p.
Киссинджер Г. Дипломатия / пер. с англ. М. : Ладомир, 1997. 848 с.
Бжезинский Зб. Великая шахматная доска: господство Америки и ее геостратегические императивы : пер. с англ. М. : Международные от ношения, 1998. 256 с.
Киссинджер Г. Нужна ли Америке внешняя политика? : пер. с англ. М. : Ладомир, 2002. 352 с.
Nye J. The paradox of American power: why the world's only superpower can't go it alone. Oxford University Press, 2003. 240 p.
Бжезинский Зб. Выбор. Мировое господство или глобальное лидерство : пер. с англ. М. : Международные отношения, 2004. 288 с.
Suettinger R. Beyond Tiananmen: The Politics of U.S. China Relations 1989-2000. Washington : Brookings Institution Press, 2004. 556 p.
Руденкин В.Н. Лоббизм, группы интересов и коррупция в США // Вестник Уральского института экономики, управления и права. 2008. № 5. С. 88-89.
Hook S. U.S. foreign policy: the paradox of world power. Washington : CQ Press, 2008. P. 82.
Dumbaugh K. China's most-favored-nation status: congressional consideration, 1989-1998 / Congressional Research Service. Updated August 1, 1998. P. 9-11.
Sutter R. U.S. policy toward China: an introduction to the role of interest groups. Lanham ; Boulder ; New York ; Oxford : Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. P. 26.
Human Rights in China : официальный сайт организации. URL: http://www.hrichina.org/
Lampton D. Same Bed Different Dreams: Managing U.S.-China Relations 1989-2000. Berkley : University of California Press, 2001. 510 p.
Pearson M. China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime // China Joins the World: Progress and Prospects / ed. E.C. Economy, M.C. Oksenberg. Council on Foreign Relations, 1999. P. 161-205.
Findlay Ch., Watson A. Economic growth and trade dependency in China // China rising: nationalism and interdependence / ed. G.D. Goodman, G. Segal. Routledge / Curzon, 1997. 196 p.
Kurlantzick J. Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World. Yale University Press, 2007. 306 p.
Sutter R. U.S. policy toward China: an introduction to the role of interest groups. Lanham ; Boulder ; New York ; Oxford : Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. 184 p.
Buzan B., Segal G. Rethinking East Asian security // Survival: Global Politics and Strategy. 1994. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 3-21.
Bernstein R., Munro R. The Coming Conflict with China. Vintage Books, 1998. 272 p.
 Evolution of socio-political and academic discussions in the US at the turn of the 20th and 21 st centuries on granting China the

Evolution of socio-political and academic discussions in the US at the turn of the 20th and 21 st centuries on granting China the "most favored nation" (MFN) regime | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. № 53. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/53/5

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 5475