On the structure of Mayapan state administrative system | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/55/16

On the structure of Mayapan state administrative system

The article discusses the administrative system of the Mayapan state, a regional Late Postclassic Maya hegemony that controlled an extensive area of the Northern Yucatan. My objective is to reconstruct the hierarchy of administrative tiers of this early state. To achieve this, the examining of the main elements of sociopolitical and geographical organization among the Yucatec Maya of the Contact period (i.e., "province", cuchcabal, cah, cuchteel, cacab, and extended family) - with the emphasis on supralocal, the most unstable structures -is supposed. The sources used are of Early Colonial origin. These are Diego de Landa's Relation de las cosas de Yucatan, the corpus of Relaciones de Yucatan of 1579-81, a number of Franciscan dictionaries (Calepino and Diccionario of Motul, Bocabulario de Maya Than, and Diccionario de Ticul), and documents from the local noble dynasties' (Cocom, Xiu, and Canul) archives. I conclude that: 1) Contact-period "provinces" of Yucatan in most cases demonstrate no continuity with the former second-rank supralocal polities subjugated to Mayapan. Some of them (Mani, Sotuta, etc.) could probably have some Mayapan-era prototypes, albeit different in scales and contours. A number of other "provinces" (Chakan, Ah Kin Chel, etc.) obviously cannot be linked to any supposed subpolity inserted into Mayapan state. 2) Still, such polities undoubtedly existed along with directly subjected local structures (cah) as did Caucel whose rulers in the middle of the 16th century pretended to hold a privilege granted by the Mayapan government. 3) The administrative system of the Mayapan-led hegemony lacked uniformity. Depending on specific conditions (absence or existence of a supralocal polity analogous to the 16th-century cuchcabal) it could have 4 or 5 hierarchical tiers. The second variation was possible if there was in the region a supralocal polity analogous to the 16th century cuuchcabal, a sort of quite extensive early state with a population of several tens of thousands. 4) Cah, a type of geographically and politically organized community having its own settlement center and rural zone as well as its own military and bureaucratic organization was the basic territorial and political unit. 5) Cah was divided into village communities called cuchteelob that were primarily social, and not political, organizations. They could recourse to independent political activity only in anomalous conditions, and it used to be limited to synecism and subsequent formation of a new cah. This articulation by cuchteelob probably used to coincide with the simultaneous infra-cah geographical division by rural settlements called cacabob.

Download file
Counter downloads: 197

Keywords

майя, Юкатан, постклассический период, политическое устройство, Maya, Yucatan, Postclassic period, political structure

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Fedyushin Vladislav V.Moscow State Universityvladfedyushin@gmail.com
Всего: 1

References

Quezada S. Maya lords and lordships. Norman, 2014.
Patel S.U. Journey to the east: Piligrimage, politics, and gender in Postclassic Mexico : PhD diss. Berkeley, 2012.
Palka J.W. Maya pilgrimage to ritual landscapes: Insights from archaeology, history, and ethnography. Albuquerque, 2014.
Masson M.A., Cepecs S. Political organization in Yucatan and Belize // The Postclassic mesoamerican world / ed. by M.E. Smith and F.F. Berdan. Salt Lake City, 2003. P. 40-44.
Folan W.J. The political and economic organization of the Lowland Maya // Mexicon. 1980. Vol. 2, n. 5. P. 73-77.
Ланда Д. Сообщение о делах в Юкатане. М. -Л., 1955.
Roys R.L. The political geography of the Yucatan Maya. Washington, 1957.
Okoshi Harada T. Tenencia de la tierra y territorialidad: conceptualization de los mayas yucatecos en visperas de la invasion espanola // Conquista, transculturacion y mestizaje: Raiz y origen de Mexico / ed. por L. Ochoa. Mexico, 1995. P. 81-89.
Relaciones Historico-Geograficas de la Gobernacion de Yucatan (Merida, Valladolid y Tabasco) / ed. por M. de la Garza et al. Mexico, 1983. T. 1-2.
Gabbert W. Becoming Maya: Ethnicity and social inequality in Yucatan since 1500. Tucson, 2004.
Федюшин В.В. Доиспанская политическая организация майя северного Юкатана в представлении европейских колонистов 2-й пол. XVI в. // Этнографическое обозрение. 2017. № 2. С. 93-105.
Bocabulario de Maya Than. Codex Vindobonensis N.S. 3833. Facsimil y transcription critica anotada. / ed. R. Acuna. Mexico, 1993.
Arzapalo Marin R. Calepino de Motul. Diccionario maya-espanol. Mexico, 1995.
Diccionario maya-espanol de Ticul / ed. J. Pio Perez. Merida, 1870.
de Ciudad Real A. Diccionario de Motul (espanol-maya). Motul, s.n. [manuscrito].
Cook S.F., Borah W. Essays in Population History: Mexico and the Caribbean. Berkeley, 1974. Vol. 2.
Jones G.D. The conquest of the last Maya kingdom. Stanford, 1998.
de Vos J. La paz del Dios y del Rey: La conquista de la selva lacandona, 1525-1821. Mexico, 1993.
Bolles D. The Mayan Franciscan vocabularies: A preliminary survey. S.n., 2003.
Bolles D. A translation of the edited text of Post Conquest Mayan literature. Lancaster, 2003.
Memoria de la distribution de los montes (Mam a 15 de agosto de 1557) // Papeles de los Xiu de Yaxa, Yucatan / ed. por S. Qu ezada y T. Okoshi Harada. Mexico, 2001. P. 55-65.
Codice de Calkini / ed. por T. Okoshi Harada. Mexico, 2009.
Rice P.M. The Kowoh in geopolitico-ritual perspective // The Kowoj: Identity, migration, and geopolitics in Late Postclassic Peten, Guatemala / ed. by P.M. Rice and D.S. Rice. Boulder, 2009. P. 21-54.
Пакин А.В. Социально-политическая организация общества юкатанских майя в конце позднего постклассического периода (1441-1541 гг.) : дис.. канд. ист. наук. М., 2014.
Okoshi Harada O. Ch'ibal y cuuchcabal: Una consideration sobre su firncion en la organization pohtica de los mayas yucatecos del poslcasico // El depliegue del poder entre los mayas: Nuevos estudios sobre la organization pohtica / ed. por A. L. Izquierdo y de la Cueva. Mexico, 2011. P. 207-224.
Papeles de los Xiu de Yaxa / ed. por S. Quezada y T. Okoshi Harada. Mexico, 2001.
Гуляев В.И. Города-государства майя (структура и функции города в раннеклассовом обществе). М., 1979.
Scholes F.V., Roys R.L. Los chontales de Acalan-Tixchel. Mexico, 1996.
Gubler R. Datos genealogicos ineditos del linaje Cocom de Yucatan // Mesoamerica. 1993. Vol. 14, № 25. P. 115-133.
Kepecs S. Mayas, Spaniards, and salt: World systems shift in Sixteenth-century Yucatan // The Postclassic to Spanish-Era transition in Mesoamerica: Archaeological perspectives / ed. by S. Kepecs and R.T. Alexander. Albuquerque, 2005. P. 117-138.
Кнорозов Ю.В. «Сообщение о делах в Юкатане» Диэго де Ланда как историко-этнографический источник // Ланда Д. Сообщение о делах в Юкатане. М. -Л., 1955. С. 3-96.
Masson M.A., Peraza Lope C. Kukulcan's realm: Urban life at Ancient Mayapan. Boulder, 2014.
Пакин А.В. Дань в обществе юкатанских майя // Развитие цивилизации и Новый Свет : Первые Кнорозовские чтения. / отв. ред. А.П. Логунов. М., 1999. С. 67-68.
Vargas Pacheco E. Cabecera, unidad y esfera pohtica: Dinamica de la provincia de Acalan // Nuevas perspectivas sobre la geografia pohtica de los mayas / ed. por T. Okoshi Harada, L.A. Williams-Beck y A.L. Izquierdo. Mexico, 2006. P. 127-158.
Gubler R. Primus inter pares: The ruling house of Cocom // INDIANA. 2001. Vol. 17/18. P. 239-268.
Okoshi Harada O. El ciiuchcabal de los Xiu: Analisis de su formation y consolidation. // Contributions in New World archaeolog y. 2012. Vol. 4. P. 229-249.
 On the structure of Mayapan state administrative system | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/55/16

On the structure of Mayapan state administrative system | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/55/16

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 2196