Structure of geopolitics | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/9

Structure of geopolitics

The purpose of this article is to analyze the structure of modern geopolitics, the description of the views of the classics, the founders of geopolitics and modern geopoliticians on the structure of this science. The structure of classical geopolitics is represented by the concepts of the German geographer Friedrich Ratzel, the Swedish state scholar Rudolf Chellen and the German geopolitician Erich Obst. Classics of geopolitics do not formulate the structure of their science in a complete form, but the idea of it can be derived by analyzing their works. In particular, Ratzel concluded that to study and understand society, it is necessary to take into account not only its "soil" but also its "blood", to involve data not only from geography, but also from history, anthropology, ethnography, and cultural studies. These scientific disciplines constitute, according to Ratzel, the structure of political geography created by him, or geopolitics. In addition, Ratzel science, as he himself admitted, can be structured according to the spheres of nature, that is, is divided into: the geosphere (land area); hydrosphere (aquatic environment); atmosphere (air). Rudolf Chellen continued Ratzel's geopolitical approach and applied it to the study of states. The Chellenge model of the state involves five different aspects of it: the territory, the economy, the people, society and government, and five scientific disciplines exploring these aspects: geopolitics (the science of the state as a geographical area); economy policy (science of economics, where the state acts as a national economy); demopolitics (the science of the country's population); sociopolitics (the science of a society governed by the state); powerpolitics (the science of power, in which the state acts as a system of domination and control). Chellen defines the structure of geopolitics more strictly than Ratzel. It consists of topopolitics, morphopolitics and physiopolitics. Erich Obst structured the world on the borders of the land surface occupied by the colonial powers and on the population living in this area. As a result, he has a picture that characterizes the distribution of the surface and population of the globe between the great powers. The structure of geopolitics as a science, according to Obst, can be represented as its differentiation into two components: the geopolitics of the territories of states and, in general, the earth's surface; geopolitics of the population of the state and, in general, the population of the Earth. Modern geopolitics continues the traditions established by the classics. It continues the Ratzel-Chellen line of differentiation of scientific directions of geopolitics, it adheres to Obst's line on the differentiation of the world according to zones of influence of the leading powers. The modern world is now divided between the great powers not only by spheres (political, military, economic, cultural), but also by sub-spheres. In the political sphere, the sub-spheres of domestic and foreign policy are clearly distinguished, in the economic sphere, the sub-spheres of finance, production, trade, energy, transport, tourism, etc., in the cultural sphere, the sub-spheres of art, sports, fashion, etc. Modern geopolitics includes, in addition to classical environments (geosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere), the underwater environment, space and virtual environments of the Internet, radio, TV, printed materials. In the process of complicating international life, the emergence of other spheres and subsubspheres is possible. This manifests itself in the structure of the real world, as well as in the structure of geopolitics, as a scientific discipline. Thus, on the basis of the ideas of the classics in modern geopolitics, an environment-sphere structure has developed. Since its inception, modern geopolitics has significantly expanded the subject of its research, and today its structure includes such scientific subdisciplines as geohistory, geoeconomics, geoculturology, geoethnopolicy, geoconfessiology, geoconflictology, global studies, geofuturology, and others.

Download file
Counter downloads: 144

Keywords

структура геополитики, дифференциация геополитики по сферам, дифференциация геополитики по субсферам, средно-сферная структура современной геополитики, научно-дисциплинарная структура современной геополитики, The structure of geopolitics, the differentiation of geopolitics by spheres, the differentiation of geopolitics by sub-spheres, the environment-sphere structure of modern geopolitics, the scientific and disciplinary structure of modern geopolitics

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Isaev Boris А.St. Petersburg State University of Aerospase Instrumentationisaevboris@yandex.ru
Ignatyeva Irina F.The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russiaiifed@mail.ru
Всего: 2

References

Игнатьева И.Ф., Исаев Б.А. Геоэкономика как структурный элемент геополитики // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Фи лософия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 44. С. 213-223.
Ратцель Ф. Земля и жизнь сравнительное жизнеописание : в 2 т. СПб., 1906. Т. 2. 758 с.
Челлен Р. Государство как форма жизни / пер. с швед. и примеч. М.А. Исаева; предисл. и примеч. М.В. Ильина. М. : Российская политиче ская энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2008. 319 с.
Ден В.Э. Учение Рудольфа Челлена о предмете и задачах геополитики. URL: file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/Den%20vs%20Rudolf_Kjellen.pdf (дата обращения: 03.01.2019).
Дугин А. Фридрих Ратцель. URL: https://www.geopolitica.ru/article/fratcel (дата обращения: 07.11.2018).
Обст Э. Англия, Европа и мир. М. ; Л. : Соцэкгиз, 1931. 325 с.
Исаев Б.А. Политология. История политических идей, современные политические идеологии, политические и партийные системы, между народные отношения и национальная безопасность. СПб. : Питер. 2005. Сер. Краткий курс (5-е изд.). 174 с.
Исаев Б. А. Геополитика : учебник для вузов. Стандарт третьего поколения. СПб. : Питер, 2016. 496 с.
Исаев Б. А. Геополитические эпохи развития Российского государства. Политическая экспертиза // ПОЛИТЭКС. 2005. Т. 1, № 2. С. 140-152.
Игнатьева И.Ф. Многомерность туризма: философский, экономический, политический аспекты // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2017. Т. 33, № 3. С. 307-315.
Игнатьева И.Ф. Туризм как фактор предупреждения геополитических конфликтов // Конфликтология. 2014. № S. С. 409-411.
Jordan Thomas. Structures of geopolitical reasoning. Outline of a constructive-developmental approach [Published as: Occasional Papers 1998:9, Kulturgeografiska Institutionen, Handelshogskolan, Goteborgs Universitet]. URL: http://www.perspectus.se/tjordan/Structuresgeopol.html. (дата обращения: 08.01.2019).
Deudney D. Geopolitics as Theory: Historical Security Materialism First Published March 1, 2000 Research Article. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354066100006001004 (дата обращения: 08.01.2019).
Hepple W. The revival of geopolitics. Author links open overlay panelLeslie // Political Geography Quarterly. Volume 5, Issue 4, Supplement 1. October 1986. P. S21-S36. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0260982786900558 (дата обращения: 08.01.2019).
Zhiding H.U., Dadao L.U. Re-interpretation of the classical geopolitical theories in a critical geopolitical perspective // Journal of Geographical Sciences. № 26 (12). Р. 1769-1784. URL: http://www.geogsci.com/article/2016/1009-637X/38805 (дата обращения: 08.01.2019).
Geopolitics of Academic Production. URL: http://knowledgegap.org/ (дата обращения: 12.01.2019).
Сирота Н.М. Школы и теории геополитики. СПб. : ГУАП, 2010. 158 с.
 Structure of geopolitics | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/9

Structure of geopolitics | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/9

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3169