International academic mobility: motivation and adaptation problems of young scientists from Russia and Europe | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/19

International academic mobility: motivation and adaptation problems of young scientists from Russia and Europe

Article analyses motivation and adaptation problems of young Russians and Europeans who participated in international academic mobility. The study was conducted since 2014 by qualitative methods - focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The results of the study show that along similar motivation and adaptation problems indicated by participants of the study, contextually it is different experience. The study reveals problems that Russian universities should address to be more attractive for European students and scholars. Russian Federation and European countries pursue internationalisation policy that formally could be considered as similar, although there are essential differences in the way it is implemented. All respondents - Russian and European, put affront professional goals for the academic mobility - to receive new knowledge or to approbate received knowledge that would help them in their further professional growth. Without exception respondents talked about positive professional experience, that they received, and that would be useful in their professional carrier. Respondents referred to additional motives for the mobility that were connected with general orientation towards international character of their profession and personal motivation. The success of mobility requires some personal characteristics that are important a person who is ready for 'travel': curiosity, desire to learn about other countries, peoples and cultures. Our study demonstrated that there is no linear correlation between previous mobility experience and evaluation of academic mobility in Russia or in Europe. Extensive international experience in Europe could create expectations of easy and fast adaptation in Russia. Unfulfilled expectations could cause frustration exactly because of previous experience and this caused complains towards Russia as a country to be difficult to live in and to study. Sometime adaptation problems originated from personal specifics of the very person and it was important when a person understands this and finds ways of dealing with such problems. Foreign universities that pursue active internationalisation normally create special programs aimed at providing logistic, cultural and language assistance to international students, including psychological aid. Russian universities should examine this experience. Good language skills were important factors for adaptation. Those European students who have good Russian language skills, didn't mention adaptation problems, they easily integrated, found friends and improved their knowledge and skills. The same is true for Russian students. At general Russian students were more positive regarding organisation of academic process, university's administration system and communication with teaching staff at European universities. European students on contrary often criticised organisation of education process, administration system of international mobility at Russian universities.

Download file
Counter downloads: 223

Keywords

академическая мобильность, молодежь, Россия, Европа, интернационализация образования, academic mobility, youth, Russia, Europe, internationalisation of education

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Deriglazova Larisa V.Tomsk State Universitydlarisa@inbox.ru
Всего: 1

References

The European Higher Education Area in 2018: Bologna Process Implementation Report. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission. EACEA. Eurydice, 2018.
Цветкова Н.А., Ярыгин Г.О., Лопач О.В. Политика международной академической мобильности Российской Федерации // Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. 2015. № 4 (13). С. 108-115.
Маркина Д.М. Социально-экономические факторы, оказывающие влияние на мотивацию обучения в России иностранных студентов на при мере РАНХИГС // Социально-экономические явления и процессы. 2018. Т. 13, № 2. С. 58-63.
Чернова В.Ю. Роль международного научно-технического сотрудничества в формировании тенденций миграции научных кадров // Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. 2018. Т. 7, № 1 (22). С. 257-260.
Tempus IV. Reform of higher education through international university cooperation. Fifth call application guidelines. EACEA 25/2011. 2011. Euro pean Commission. Tempus. URL: https://erasmusplus.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/5th_call_application_guidelines_en.pdf (дата обращения: 8.04.2019).
Государственная программа «Глобальное образование». URL: http://educationglobal.ru/ns/employers/become_employer/ (дата обращения: 8.04.2019).
Проект «Экспорт образования». URL: http://government.ru/info/27864/ (дата обращения: 8.04.2019).
Обучение иностранных граждан в высших учебных заведениях Российской Федерации : статистический сборник / Министерство образова ния и науки Российской Федерации. М. : Центр социологических исследований, 2015. Вып. 12. 196 с.
Россия в цифрах. 2018: Краткий статистический сборник. M. : Росстат, 2018. 522 с.
Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет. Итоги научно-исследовательской деятельности в 2017 г. Томск, 2018. 167 с.
Абрамова М.О., Рыкун А.Ю., Сухушина Е.В., Южанинов К.М. Образовательные, трудовые и миграционные ориентации студентов томских университетов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2014. № 1 (25). С. 5-18.
Алексеев Т.Д. Включенность молодых ученых в международное сообщество: инструмент профессионального развития «на родине» или стимул к внешней мобильности? // Мониторинг общественного мнения. 2013. № 4 (116). С. 111-126.
Грошева Г.В., Дериглазова Л.В. Влияние международной академической мобильности на идентичность молодежи // Европейский путь для России: за и против. Воронеж : Издательский дом ВГУ, 2017. С. 135-148.
Грошева Г.В., Дериглазова Л.В., Поправко И.Г. Изучение международной молодежной академической мобильности качественными методами // Антропология в поисках нового языка описания : тезисы. Томск, 2016. С. 58-59.
Дериглазова Л.В., Балякин А.А., Погорельская А.М., Шабалина А.Д., Катаман Д.О., Трифонова Д.Д., Шведов Д.В., Лескина Н.В., Михайлов А.М., Озубекова М., Смоленчук О.Ю., Чугунова Н.Е. Университет будущего: стратегия развития вуза // Вестник Томского государственного университетата. История. 2018. № 52. С. 71-81.
Роузи Л. Модернизация органов государственной власти в Европейском союзе и Российской Федерации: взгляд молодежи (на английском языке) // Европа и Европейский союз глазами ученых / ред. Л.В. Дериглазова. Томск : Изд-во Том. ун-та, 2018. С. 97-134.
Standard Eurobarometer, 2018. Standard Eurobarometer 89. European citizenship. March. Published June 2018.
Shenderova Svetlana. Permanent uncertainty as normality? Finnish-Russian double degrees in the post-Crimea world //Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. October 2018. P. 1-19.
 International academic mobility: motivation and adaptation problems of young scientists from Russia and Europe | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/19

International academic mobility: motivation and adaptation problems of young scientists from Russia and Europe | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2019. № 59. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/59/19

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 3170