The struggle against bolshevism as a factor of the intervention policy-making after the armistice of Compiegne (based on the documents of the British war cabinet of ministers dated November-December, 1918) | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/70/12

The struggle against bolshevism as a factor of the intervention policy-making after the armistice of Compiegne (based on the documents of the British war cabinet of ministers dated November-December, 1918)

The article is devoted to the process of the formation of a renewed British policy of intervention in Russia after the Armistice of Compiegne. This policy was based on the necessity to take into account threats to the world retained in the postwar period. According to the official British documents, Bolshevism was considered such a threat. The research objective is to find out the significance and validity of the struggle against Bolshevism as a factor of strengthening of the British intervention in Russia in November-December, 1918. The paper is based on the official documents: the memorandum “Our Present and Future Military Policy in Russia” by the Chief of the Imperial General Staff H. Wilson (November 13, 1918), the memorandum “Future Military Policy in Russia” by the Chairman of the Board of Education H. Fischer (December 5, 1918), the document “Notes on our Policy in Russia”, prepared by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs A. Balfour (November 1918), the decision of the conference in the Foreign Office of November 13, 1918 and minutes of the War Cabinet of Ministers meetings of November 14 and December 10, 1918. In November-December, 1918 Bolshevism was viewed at the official level in connection with the development of an updated policy of intervention after the Armistice. It was included as a separate item on the agenda of the Cabinet of Ministers meeting on November 14, 1918 and the decision on a new wave of the intervention was taken in considering the issue of Bolshevism. Bolshevism and several Bolshevism in the renewed policy of intervention though the goal of establishing a certain form of government in Russia was not set. Explanations on this issue were given at the Cabinet meeting on December 10, 1918 while considering Fisher’s memorandum and Balfour’s document. The author concludes that in November-December, 1918 the fight against Bolshevism was an important factor of the British intervention policy due to the following main reasons: Bolshevism was viewed by the Cabinet of Ministers as a danger to the world because of its possible territorial expansion, and the fight against it was viewed as a means to prevent the influence of Germany in the territory of the former Russian Empire and accordingly to strengthen the role of Great Britain in the postwar world.

Download file
Counter downloads: 107

Keywords

Bolshevism, intervention, Armistice of Compiegne, War Cabinet of Ministers

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Mironyuk Sergei A.Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)privetsergey95@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Черчилль У.С. Мировой кризис. Последствия. М. : Принципиум, 2014. 456 с.
Шубин А.В. Десять вопросов о революции в России (1917-1922). М. : Просвещение, 2018. 64 с.
War Cabinet, 502. Minutes of a Meeting of the War Cabinet // NA. CAB 23/8 Original Reference WC 480-513, 1918 1 Oct - 19 Dec. P. 76-77.
War Cabinet, 511. Minutes of a Meeting of the War Cabinet // NA. CAB 23/8 Original Reference WC 480-513, 1918 1 Oct - 19 Dec. P. 104-105.
G.T. 6443. Future Military Policy in Russia. Memorandum by Dr. H.A.L. Fisher // NA. Cab. 24/71. Original Reference GT 6401-6500, 1918 31 October - 18 December. P. 142-143.
Notes on our Policy in Russia by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs // NA. CAB 23/8 Original Reference WC 480-513, 1918 1 Oct - 19 Dec. P. 106.
Minute of the Proceedings of a Conference held at the Foreign Office on November 13, 1918, at 3:30 p.m. // NA. CAB 23/8 Original Reference WC 480-513, 1918 1 Oct - 19 Dec. P. 78-79.
G.T. 6311. Our Present and Future Military Policy in Russia. Memo by C.I.G.S. // The National Archives (NA). CAB 24/70. Original Reference GT 6301-6400, 1918 1 Oct - 28 Nov. P. 22-23.
Кэш Т. Русская гражданская война и интервенция союзников // Гражданская война в России: перекресток мнений. М. : Наука, 1994. С. 244-251.
Эдельман Дж. Историческое значение русской гражданской войны // Гражданская война в России: перекресток мнений. М. : Наука, 1994. C. 364-375.
Уорт Р. Антанта и русская революция, 1917-1918 / пер. с англ. Л. А. Игоревского. М. : Центрполиграф, 2006. 271 с.
Ullman R.H. Anglo-soviet relations, 1917-1921. Intervention and the War. New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 1961. 492 p.
Уткин А.И. Первая мировая война. М. : Культурная революция, 2010. 560 с.
Капитонова Н.К., Романова Е.В. История внешней политики Великобритании. М. : Междунар. отношения, 2016. 840 с.
Волков Ф.Д. Тайны Уайтхолла и Даунинг-стрит. М. : Мысль, 1980. 462 с.
Быстрова Н.Е. «Русский вопрос» в 1917 - начале 1920 г.: Советская Россия и великие державы. М. : Ин-т рос. истории РАН, Центр гумани тарных инициатив, 2016. 368 с.
История гражданской войны в СССР : в 5 т. М. : Госполитиздат, 1958. Т. 3. 680 с.
История Коммунистической партии Советского Союза. М. : Политиздат, 1977. 782 с.
 The struggle against bolshevism as a factor of the intervention policy-making after the armistice of Compiegne (based on the documents of the British war cabinet of ministers dated November-December, 1918) | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/70/12

The struggle against bolshevism as a factor of the intervention policy-making after the armistice of Compiegne (based on the documents of the British war cabinet of ministers dated November-December, 1918) | Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2021. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/70/12

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1033