National Autonomy of Khingan (Xingan) as a public-power institution of control by the Japanese of the Mongolian territories of Manchukuo. Part 1: Eastern and Southern regions / governorships
The purpose of the study is to assess the degree of effectiveness of the national policy of the Japanese in the Mongolian lands they occupied, which became part of the state of Manchukuo formed by them in 1931, and to determine the place of the Khingan (Xingan) national autonomy in it. The source base was made up of periodicals and nonperiodicals in Russian, published on the basis of Orientalist societies and the CER by our compatriots living in Manchuria, foreign media, periodicals and reference publications. The content of the study is based on the fact that the ethnic composition of the population of Manchuria, as well as the entire Outer China, was not monolithic, and therefore the national question in the region played a paramount role for any act. Using anti-Chinese sentiment, the Japanese, by granting the Mongols a high degree of autonomy, enlist their support and loyalty, which is necessary both for securing control over the territories under their control, and for moving further deep into the continent, and for ensuring the security of their sphere of influence from the USSR. Having retained the traditional Mongolian institutions of governance, a new administrative-territorial unit is being formed - the largest in the new empire, with complex intrastate administration, called Khingan or Xingan. The core of the new province was the territories of the western limits of Inner Mongolia actively colonized by the Chinese, on which the Eastern, Southern and Northern regions were formed. Unlike other provinces, there is no position of governor here: each of the territories is governed by its own administration, the coordination of which is provided by the Directorate / Main Directorate / Ministry of Mongolian Affairs, headed by an ethnic Mongol - the prince of a large Western Mongolian khoshun. The autonomy status was confirmed by the preservation of ancient foundations and the possibility of independent internal control, the right to have its own armed forces, carry out educational and religious policies, exemption from a significant part of taxes and fees, and other privileges. Each region, transformed into a governorship in 1934, was headed by an ethnic Mongol - a representative of the ancient tribal aristocracy and the number of descendants of Genghis Khan or his brothers. Regions/governorships were divided into khoshuns, whose borders remained unchanged. The author comes to the conclusion that at the initial stage of the military invasion of the continent, the Japanese side managed to achieve its goals and, without military force, gain support among the Mongolian population. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
Khingan (Xingan),
Manchukuo,
Barga,
Manchuria,
public authoritiesAuthors
| Dudin Pavel N. | Institute of Mongolian Studies, Buddhology and Tibetology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences | dudin2pavel@gmail.com |
Всего: 1
References
Datsyshen, V.G. (2018) SSSR i Man'chzhou-Go: problemy sovetskogo priznaniya kvazigosudarstva [The USSR and Manchukuo: Problems of Soviet Recognition of a Quasi-State]. Evraziya: gosudarstvo ipravo. 10. pp. 38-52.
Sydney Morning Herald (NSW: 1842-1954). (1934) Mongolia. Country Now Prominent. 23rd August.
The Straits Times. (1937) No territorial designs. 18th October.
Sydney Morning Herald (NSW: 1842-1954). (1935) Manchukuo. Western Frontier Incidents. 26th February.
Tsybenov, B.D. (2017) Daury na puti k natsional'noy avtonomii. Ocherki istorii (1912-1958 gg.) [Daurs on the Path to National Autonomy. Historical Essays (1912-1958)]. Evraziya: gosudarstvo ipravo. pp. 65-76.
The Times. (1935) An Eye-witness in Mongolia I. - Benefactions of Japan. 25th March.
The Straits Times. (1933) Big offensive launched. 9th May.
The New York Times. (1934) Mongols get autonomy. 25th April.
Powell, J. (1933) Mongolians declare independence. Inner Mongolia declares itself free from China. Chicago Daily Tribune. 14th October.
The Straits Times. (1933) Passes to be returned?" 24th October.
Kormazov, V.A. (1934) Khintangskaya provintsiya [Hingan Province]. Vestnik Man'chzhurii. 1. pp. 31-74.
Anon. (1942) Velikaya Man'chzhurskaya Imperiya: k desyatiletnemu yubileyu [The Great Manchurian Empire: To the Tenth Anniversary]. Harbin: Izd. Gos. org. Kio-va-kai: Gl. byuro po delam ros. emigrantov v Man'chzhur. imperii.
Pravitel'stvennyy vestnik Man'chzhou-Go. (1932a) 1st April.
Jiang Niandong et al. (1980) Istoriya marionetochnogo gosudarstva Man'chzhou-Go [History of the Puppet State Manchukuo]. Jilin: Narodnoe izdatel'stvo provintsii Tsilin.
Shen Yan. (2002) Velikolepnyye ruiny postroek marionetochnogo gosudarstva Man'chzhou-Go v Chanchune [The Splendid Ruins of Manchukuo Puppet State Buildings in Changchun]. Jilin: Fotoizdatel'stvo provintsii Tsilin.
Pravitel'stvennyy vestnik Man'chzhou-Go. (1932b) 15th April.
Pravitel'stvennyy vestnik Man'chzhou-Go. (1932c) 27th June.
Pravitel'stvennyy vestnik Man'chzhou-Go. (1932d) 12th November.
Anon. (1934) Man'chzhuriya: ekonomichesko-geograficheskoye opisaniye [Manchuria: An Economic-Geographical Description]. Vol. 1. Harbin: [s.n.].
Manchu-Di-Go. (1936a) Polozheniye ob organizatsii Upravlenii otdel'nykh provintsiy Sin'-An': Vysochayshiy Ukaz No. 164, 29 noyabrya 1 g. Kan-De [Regulations on the Organization of the Administration of the Xing'an Provinces: Imperial Decree No. 164, November 29, 1st Year of Kangde]. In: Sbornik zakonov i rasporyazheniy Man'chzhu-Di-Go na russkom yazyke [Collection of Laws and Decrees of Manchu-Di-Go in Russian]. Vol. 1. Harbin: Osava Zhung. pp. 106-109.
Manchu-Di-Go. (1936b) Polozheniye ob organizatsii znamen: Ukaz Verkhovnogo Pravitelya No. 75, 1 iyulya, g. Da-Tun [Regulations on the Organization of Banners: Decree of the Supreme Ruler No. 75, July 1, Year of Datong]. (1936). In: Sbornik zakonov i rasporyazheniy Man'chzhu-.Di-Go na russkom yazyke [Collection of Laws and Decrees of Manchu-Di-Go in Russian]. Vol. 1. Harbin: Osava Zhung. pp. 122-128.
Sladkovskiy, M.I. (ed.) (1984) Noveyshaya istoriya Kitaya, 1928-1949 [The Modern History of China, 1928-1949]. Moscow: Nauka.
The Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser. (1934) Japan’s bluff. 7th November.
Xu Youchun. (1991) Biograficheskiy slovar' Kitayskoy Respubliki [Biographical Dictionary of the Republic of China]. Shijiazhuang: Narodnoe izdatel'stvo provintsii KHebei.
Boloban, A. (1909) Tsitsikar: ekonomicheskiy ocherk [Qiqihar: An Economic Essay]. Vestnik Azii. 1. pp. 74-121.
Novaya gazeta Vostochnoy Mongolii. (1946) 13th March.
Bogoslovskiy, V.A. (1984) Natsional'nyy vopros v Kitaye (1914-1949) [The National Question in China (1911-1949)]. Moscow: Nauka.
Wang Enjun & Wang Shiyi. (1989) Vekhi natsional'no-osvoboditel'nogo dvizheniya vo Vnutrenney Mongolii: obzor soveshchaniya 3 aprelya [Milestones of the National Liberation Movement in Inner Mongolia: A Review of the April 3rd Conference]. VestnikPedagogicheskogo instituta narod-nostey Vnutrenney Mongolii (Obshchestvennyye nauki). 4. pp. 77-79.
Surin, V.I. (1932) Zheleznyye dorogi v Man'chzhurii i Kitaye: materialy k transportnoy probleme v Kitaye i Man'chzhurii [Railways in Manchuria and China: Materials on the Transport Problem in China and Manchuria]. Harbin: Tip. Kitayskoy Vostochnoy zheleznoy dorogi.
Pravitel'stvennyy vestnik Man'chzhou-Go. (1933) 10th May.
Lattimore, O. (1956) Satellite Politics, the Mongolian Prototype. The Western Political Quarterly. 9(1). pp. 36-43.