Daily life of the party organization of sverdlovskii obllit in 1930s

The study was conductedin the format is gaining popularity in domestic science areas - stories of everyday life. To unique archival materials examined practicesof everyday life of the party organization of the Ural censors. The study showed that the daily work of the censors was tense, and domesticissues made the psychological climate in the team unsustainable. Power structure does not support the party organizations of workerscensorship. Treatment of Censors to the leaders of Party committees and government organizations do not give a positive effect. Financialdifficulties prevented the coordinated work of the apparatus of censorship. Since wages censor only enough to rent a house and its contentshas already been committed to do. No benefits Ural censors was not provided in the 1930's or early 1940. In most cases, the party "part" ofcensorship policy remains formal. The article noted that the party committees is not clearly presented the problem of political censorship.Party committees at times even wedged into the work of the preliminary control and interfered with the censors to perform their duties. Inattentionto the needs of government censors oppressed and offended their feelings, and most importantly hope for the introduction to the benefitsof a privileged stratum of society. Do not give moral satisfaction from the status of the profession, is constantly experiencing financialhardship, a good specialist left the censorship authority. The study concluded that no stops updating the staff of the Uralic obllitov apparatusin the second half of 1930 - nach.1940's. can be attributed to the so-called "human factor". Meeting the daily needs were still the primary,rather than professional interests. It should be established that outside this research there are some unsolved problems. The question about theCensorship control of press in Ural demands the separate complex study and analyze personal passions of sensors in the process of theirwork. The research of the problem of relationships of Ural writers, artists and others towards the activity of the censorship department andconcrete censors.

Keywords

Authors

References