VALUE OF THE DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO INTERACTION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF DIFFERENT CULTURES FOR ELABORATIONS IN AREA OF CROSS-CULTURE DIDACTICS | Open and distance education. 2013. № 2 (50).

VALUE OF THE DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO INTERACTION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF DIFFERENT CULTURES FOR ELABORATIONS IN AREA OF CROSS-CULTURE DIDACTICS

Cultural aspect in teaching becomes exceedingly significant due to the coexistence in international academic environment various national systems of education and their products. The paper analyzes the factors that methodologists and instructors should consider in the contemporary multicultural educational environment when they develop and implement programs. The functions of the tutor are characterized from the perspective of cross-cultural multimedia didactics; the leading role is assigned to intercultural competence. The authors come up with the innovative method that is based on the technique of cultural assimilator and allows increasing the level of intercultural competence of a tutor.

Download file

Counter downloads: 936

Keywords

multicultural educational environment, cultural assimilator, tutor’s competence, cross-cultural multimedia didactic, поликультурное образовательное пространство, культурный ассимилятор, кросскультурная мультимедийная дидактика, компетентность тьютора

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Taratuhina Yu.V.	National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow	j.v.taratoukhina@mail.ru
Cherniak N.V.	National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow

Всего: 2

References

van Hook C.W. Preparing Teachers for the Diverse Classroom: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity // In: Issues in Early Childhood Education: Curriculum, Teacher Education, & Dissemination of Information. Proceedings of the Lilian Katz Sympos

Pedersen P.J. Assessing intercultural effectiveness outcomes in a year-long study abroad program // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. – 2010. – Vol. 34, Issue 1. – P. 70–80.

Rehm M., Andre E., Nischt M. Let’s Come Together // Social Navigation Behaviors of Virtual and Real Humans. – Springer, 2005. – P. 122–131.

Joanne P.H., Bentley J.P.H., Tinney M.V., Chia B.H. Intercultural Internet-Based Learning: Know your Audience and What They Value.

Martinez M., Bunderson C.V., Nelson L.M., Ruttan J.P. Successful Learning in the New Millennium: A new web learning paradigm. Paper found in the proceedings for the annual meeting of WebNet, International Conference, Honolulu, HI, 1999.

Hofstede G. Cultural differences in teaching and learning' // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. – 1986. – 10 (3). – P. 301–320.

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences, International Differences in Work Related Values. – Sage Publications, 1980. – 328 p.

Harrington H.L., Hathaway R.S. Illuminating beliefs about diversity // Journal of Teacher Education. – 1995. – 46(4). – P. 275–284.

Henning P.H. Everyday Cognition and Situated Learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. – Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. – P. 143–168.

Gundling E. How to communicate globally // Training & Development. – 1999. – P. 30–31.

Hall E.T. Beyond Culture. – Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 1976. – 320 p.

Cushner K., Mahon J. Overseas Student Teaching: Affecting Personal, Professional, and Global Competencies in an Age of Globalization // Journal of Studies in International Education. – 2002. – P. 44–58.

Driscoll M. Psychology of learning for instruction. – 2nd Ed. – New York: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.

Cushner K. The Role of Experience in the Making of Internationally-Minded Teachers // Teacher Education Quarterly. – 2007. – P. 27–39.

Bentley J.P.H. Learning Orientation Questionnaire Correlation with the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument: A validity study. Doctoral Dissertation. – Brigham Young University, Utah, 2000.

Cockrell K.S., Placier P.L., Cockrell D.H., Middleton J.N. Coming to terms with «diversity» and «multiculturalism» in teacher education: Learning about our students, changing our practice // Teaching and Teacher Education. – 1999. – № 15. – P. 351–366.

Bennett M.J. Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R.M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural experience (2nd ed.). – Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 1993.

Archee R. Online intercultural communication // Intercomm. – Vol. 50:8, 40. – 2003.

Холодная М.А. Когнитивные стили. О природе индивидуального ума. – 2-изд. – СПб.: Питер. – 2004. – 384 с.

Таратухина Ю.В., Баранова И.М. Роль открытых образовательных ресурсов в современном поликультурном информационно-образовательном пространстве // Бизнес-информатика. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 35–42.

Таратухина Ю.В. Кросскультурная мультимедийная дидактика как неотъемлемая составляющая сетевого образования: основные особенности и проблемы // Проблемы полиграфии и издательского дела. – 2011. – № 6. – C. 64–70.

Таратухина Ю.В., Чамина О.Г. Сетевые сообщества образовательной направленности в поликультурном контексте: метод открытого контента // Бизнес-информатика. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 3–10.

Мясоедов С.П. Управление бизнесом в различных деловых культурах. – М.: Вершина, 2009. – 320 с.

Социальная компетентность классного руководителя: режиссура совместных действий / Под ред. А.Г. Асмолова, Г.У. Солдатовой. – М.: Смысл, 2006. – 321 с.

Андреева Е.А. Современные модели тьюторства в России и странах Европейского союза и Ближнего Востока (сравнительный анализ) // Вестник ПАГС. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 131–136.