DIGITAL MULTY-TASKING AND STUDENTS LEARNING
This article contains an overview of some of the psychological and educational research on the impact of digital technologies in the classroom. The prevalence of mobile technology can create problems in teaching students. Mobile technologies generated multitasking have a different impact on cognitive ability and academic performance. Digital multitasking in the educational process occurs when the use of digital technologies in the classroom. In contrast to the well-known problem of information overload and task switching, digital multitasking has fundamentally new and therefore must be analyzed in a different conceptual field. This approach is based on the fact that a person is a cognitive system for processing information. Psychological studies show that there is a drop in productivity under certain conditions the use of students of mobile devices. It possible to identify a range of opinions from the complete negation of the multitasking capabilities to the approval of the inevitable changes in the brain (“digital psihomorfoz”) under the influence of human interaction with digital technology. Digital multitasking does not create fundamental obstacles learning. Nevertheless, we can safely conclude that shifting attention greatly increases the amount of time needed to complete the task. Distraction and time spent switching from task to task, will have a negative impact on the academic performance of students. The use of digital technology teacher creates a multitasking for the student. Specific application of digital technologies in one time or another class is determined by the goals set by the teacher. Using a mobile student in the audience may entail a negative effect on academic performance. Multitasking can qualitatively change the training as a student relies on different information processing systems, which differ in the degree of flexibility, ie, chooses what kind of organizing information to use in a particular case. The author concludes that the studies analyzed digital multitasking, a shift in the education systems and focus on the methodology operationalism attempts to apply the methodology of analytic philosophy of mind. This allows us to analyze the intentions, motives, qualia (phenomenal experience) involved in the educational process and, thus, define new conceptual framework of digital multitasking. In general, researcher` efforts to develop new theoretical analysis of the frameworks of digital multitasking is unlikely to can be considered successful.
Keywords
цифровая многозадачность,
цифровые технологии,
обучение студентов,
digital multitasking,
digital technology,
students learningAuthors
| Ignatova N.Y. | Nizhny Tagil Institute of Technology (Branch) of the Ural Federal University | nina1316@yandex.ru |
Всего: 1
References
Greenfield P. Mind and Media: the Effects of Television, Video Games and Computers. - Harvard University Press, 1984. - URL: http://www.cdmc.ucla.edu/Mind_and_Media_files /MMCHP1.pdf
Prensky М. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom // Hopeful Essays to 21st Century Learning. - Corwin Press, 2012. - URL: http://marcprensky.com/from-digital-natives-to-digital-wisdom/
Gasser U., Palfrey J. Mastering Multitasking // Educational Leadership. - 2007. - Vol. 66 (6). - P. 14-19. - URL: http://cf.linnbenton.edu/wed/dev/hakek/upload/mutli1.pdf
Study: Multitasking hinders learning // eSchool News. - 2006. - July 26. - URL: http://www.eschoolnews.com/2006/07/26/study-multitasking-hinders-learning
Rosen L. Teaching the iGeneration // Educational Leadership. - 2007. - Vol. 68(5). - P. 10-15. - URL: http://www.ascd.org /publications/educational-leadership/feb11/vol68/num05/Teaching-the-iGeneration.aspx
Игнатова Н.Ю. Многозадачность и успеваемость студентов // Открытое и дистанционное образование. - 2014. - № 3 (55). - C. 5-11. - URL: http://journals.tsu.ru/ou/ &journal_page=archive&id =1080&article _id=11272
Креншоу Д. Миф о многозадачности. К чему приводит умение успеть все. - М.: Эксмо, 2010. - URL: http://libes.ru/288511.html
McPeak D. Multitasking vs Switch-tasking. - URL: http://incident-prevention.com/ip-articles /multitasking-vs-switch-tasking-what-s-the-difference
Rubinstein J., Meyer D., Evans J. Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task switching // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. - 2001. - Vol. 27(4). - P. 763-797. - URL: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/xhp 274763.pdf
Speier C., Valacich J., Vessey I. The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making // Decision Sciences. - 2007. - Vol. 20(2). - P. 337-360. - URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download ?doi=10.1.1.77.481&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kirsch D. Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload // Intellectica. - 2000. - Vol. 1(30). - P. 19-51. - URL: http://adrenaline.ucsd.edu/kirsh/Articles/Overload/Cognitive_Overload.pdf
Амен Д. Измени свой мозг - изменится и тело! - М.: Эксмо, 2011.
Small G., Vorgan G. Ibrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. - New York: Collins Living, 2008. - URL: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/sample/read /9780061340345.
Jones Q., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information Overload and The Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration // Information System Research. - 2004. - Vol. 15(2). - P. 94-210. - URL: http://www.ravid.org/gilad/isr.pdf
Sanbonmatsu D., Strayer D., Medeiros-Ward N., Watson J. Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking // LoS ONE. - 2013. - Vol. 8(1). - URL:http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371 /journal.pone.0054 402.
Medina J. Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. - Seatle: Pear Press, 2008. - URL: http://ext100.wsu.edu/pierce/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2014/01/BrainRules-JohnMedina-MediaKit.pdf
Prensky М. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom // Hopeful Essays to 21st Century Learning. - Corwin Press, 2012. - URL: http://marcprensky.com/from-digital-natives-to-digital-wisdom
Сандомирский М.Е. Риски интернета: цифровой психоморфоз и инфантильность // http://webscience.ru/details/riski-interneta-cifrovoy-psihomorfoz-i-infantilnost
Chang S., Ley K. A Learning Strategy to compensate for Cognitive Overload in Online Learning // Journal of Interactive Online Learning. - 2006. - Vol. 5(1). - P. 104-117. - URL: http://www.ncolr.org/jiol /issues/PDF/5.1.8.pdf
Viadero D. Instant Messaging found to slow Students’ Reading // Education Week. - 2008. - August 15. - URL: www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/08/27 /01im.h28.html
Ophir E., Nass C., Wagner A.D. Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. - 2009. - Vol. 106(37). - P. 15583-15587.
Savolainen P., Mannering F. Effectiveness Of Motorcycle Training And Motorcyclists’ Risk-Taking Behavior // Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. - 2008. - Vol. 2031/2007. - P. 52-58. - URL: http://trb.metapress.com/content/3332n8q718k25830/
Шварц Б. Парадокс выбора. Как мы выбираем, и почему больше значит меньше. - М.: Добрая книга, 2005.
Keen A. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture. - London: Nicholas Bradley Publishing, 2007. - URL: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~mill3239/home /presentations/panel3-1.pdf
Чалмерс Д. Сознающий ум. В поисках фундаментальной теории. - УРСС: Книжный дом «Либроком», 2013.
Hembrooke H., Gay G. The Laptop and the Lecture: The Effects of Multitasking in Learning Environments // Journal of Computing in Higher Education. - 2003. - Vol. 15(1). - P. 46-64. - URL: http://www.ugr.es/~victorhs/gbd/docs/10.1.1.9.9018.pdf
Willingham D. Have Technology and Multitasking Rewired How Students Learn? // American Educator. - 2009. - Vol. 34 (2). - P. 23-28. - URL: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ889151.
Verhaeghen P., Salthouse T. Meta-Analyses of Age-Cognition Relations in Adulthood: Estimates of Linear and Nonlinear Age Effects and Structural Models // Psychological Bulletin. - 1997. - Vol. 122, № 3. - P. 231-249. - URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed /9354147.
Huk T. «Who benefits from Learning with 3D Models? The Case of Spatial Ability // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. - 2006. - Vol. 6 (22). - P. 392-404. - URL: https://myportfolio-olufs.wikispaces.com/file/view/Who+benefits+from+3D+models.pdf
Jungo R. In-class Multitasking and Academic Performance // Computers in Human Behavior. - 2012. - Vol. 28, iss. 6. - P. 2236-2243. - URL: https://www.academia.edu/1879003/In-class_multitasking_and_academic_performance
Rosen L.D., Carrier L.M., Cheever N.A. Facebook And Texting Made Me Do It: Media-Induced Task-Switching While Studying // Computers in Human Behavior. - May 2013. - Vol. 29, issue 3. - P. 948-958. - URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0747563212003305.
Hartmann M. The Web Generation? The (de)Construction of Users, Morals, and Consumption. - Brussels: Free University of Brussels, 2003. - URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research /EMTEL/reports/hartmann_2003_emtel.pdf
Bawden D., Robinson L. The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and other Paradoxes and Pathologies // Journal of Information Science. - 2008. - Vol. XX (X). - P. 1-12. - URL: http://www.bollettinoadapt.it/old/files/document/21976david_b-2008.pdf
Gantz J.F. The Expanding Digital Universe: A Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth through. - Framingham, MA: IDC, 2010. - URL: www.emc.com/collateral /analyst-reports /expanding-digital-idc-white-paper.pdf
Jones C., Shao B. The NET Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. - York: Higher Education Academy, 2011. - URL: http://oro.open.ac.uk/30014 /1/ Jones_and_Shao-Final.pdf
Foehr U. Media Multitasking among American Youth: Prevalence, Predictors and Pairings. - Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2006. - URL: www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf
Iqbal S.T., Horvitz E. Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks. - URL: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/horvitz/chi_2007_iqbal_horvitz.pdf
Levine L.E., Waite B.M., Bowman L.L. Can Students really Multitask? // Computers & Education. - May 2010. - Vol. 54, iss. 4. - P. 927-931. - URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science /article/pii /S0360131509002656.
Ravizza S., Hambrick D., Fenn K. Non-academic Internet use in the Classroom is negatively related to Classroom Learning Regardless of Intellectual Ability // Computers & Education. - 2014. - Vol. 10(4). - P. 109-114. - URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0360131514001298
Lavie N. Distracted and confused? Selective Attention under Load // TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences. - 2005. - Vol. 9(2). - P. 75-82. - URL: http://www.icn.ucl.ac.uk/lavielab /reprints/Tics-load-review.pdf
Allen D., Shoard M. Spreading the Load: Mobile Information and Communications Technologies and their Effect on Information Overload // Information Research. - 2005. - Vol. 10(2). - P. 227. - URL: http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper227.html
