Possible models of blended learning in training of future bachelors of metallurgical majors | Open and distance education. 2018. № 1(69). DOI: 10.17223/16095944/69/1

Possible models of blended learning in training of future bachelors of metallurgical majors

The article considers the possibility of using e-learning in training of future bachelors in Chemistry at universities. It shows that Russian and foreign researchers use actively the model “flipped classroom” provided by blended learning. It offers a scheme of model implementation «flipped classroom» in computer educational environment for training chemistry taking into account science specifics. A pedagogical experiment was conducted at Siberian Federal University to determine the effectiveness of the methods developed. The experiment was carried out in the groups of metallurgical students on the module “Electrochemical reactions” in the framework of the discipline “Chemistry of inorganic and organic compounds”. It took place in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 academic years per 33 students for each year. The knowledge level of the theoretical material was analyzed by the results of the final tests based on the component analyses. The final test included 27 assignments. The assignments were aimed at identifying the level of knowledge of the conceptual apparatus, the ability to use the acquired knowledge in modified conditions, in particular the ability to describe/predict the processes taking place in the galvanic element, the chemical corrosion of two contact metals in the acid environment/wet air atmosphere, electrolysis of electrolyte solutions in inert electrodes/active anode. In accordance with the purpose of the pilot study were calculated median and coefficient of systematization of knowledge. The coefficient of the systematization of knowledge (coefficient of knowledge) was calculated according to the formula proposed by the A.V. Usova: where li - the number of components learned by i-student; l - the total number of components, that must be learned; N - the number of trainees. Raising the median value: 3.8 (2015-2016), 3.9 (2016-2017) compared to 3.2 (2013-2014) within the framework of traditional training, as well as the systematization of knowledge factor: 0.72 (2015-2016), 0.75 (2016-2017) compared to 0.66 (2013-2014 g.g.) allows you to make a conclusion about the effectiveness of the proposed scheme. Thus, the obtained results suggest that it is appropriate to apply the “flipped class model” as varieties of blended learning model in chemical training of future bachelors. However, its impact depends on the saturation of the electronic environment with educational resources that provide different forms of presentation of the training material, select the path of the material to be developed by students based on their individual characteristics, perform interactive tasks (glossary, construct logic-structural schemes, estimate and evaluate, etc.). Efficient training of students to classroom work frees up time in the classroom and helps solve more complex problems. Students learn how to plan and organize their own work to master the content of the discipline, acquire working skills, communicate in educational computer environment (IDOS), which has positive impact on the quality of their knowledge. With regard to problems, the organization of active student activity in an electronic environment is a labor-intensive process for the teacher, which, unfortunately, is not marked in the academic load. Our further research will involve studies of conditions for effective use of other models of blended learning.

Download file
Counter downloads: 324

Keywords

лектронное обучение, смешанное обучение, модель «перевернутый класс», химическая подготовка, информационно-деятельностная образовательная среда, e-learning, blended learning, model “flipped classroom”, chemical training, information-and-activity-based educational environment

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Vostricova N.M.Siberian Federal University, Institute of nonferrous metals and material science, Krasnoyarsk, Russiavnatali59@mail.ru
Всего: 1

References

Велединская С.Б. Смешанное обучение: секреты эффективности / С.Б. Велединская, М.Ю. Дорофеева // Высшее образование сегодня. - 2014. - № 8. - С. 8-13.
Bonk C.J., Graham C.R. Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. - San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006. - P. 624.
Капустин Ю.И. Информационные технологии в подготовке химиков-технологов / Ю.И. Капустин, Т.В. Гусева, Г.А. Ягодин // Высшее образование в России. - 2007. - № 8. - С. 29-36.
Безрукова Н.П. Современные информационно-коммуникационные технологии в обучении химическим дисциплинам в высшей школе: учеб. пособие / Н.П. Безрукова. - Красноярск: Краснояр. гос. пед. ун-т им. В.П. Астафьева, 2016. - 148 с.
Безрукова Н.П. К вопросу о повышении качества обучения химическим дисциплинам в вузе / Н.П. Безрукова // Вестник Красноярского государственного аграрного университета. - 2006. - № 11. - С. 380-385.
Weaver G.C. Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course / G.C. Weaver, H.G. Sturtevant // J. Chem. Educ. - 2015. - Vol. 92, № 9. - P. 1437-1448.
Mooring S.R. Evaluation of a flipped, large-enrollment organic chemistry course on student attitude and achievemen / S.R. Mooring, C.E. Mitchell, N.L. Burrows // J. Chem. Educ. - 2016. - Vol. 93. - Р. 1972-1983.
Smith J.D. Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom // Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. - 2013. - Vol. 14, № 4. - P. 607-614.
Eichler J.F. Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades / J.F. Eichler, J. Peeples // Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. - 2016. - Vol. 17, № 1. - P. 197-208.
Christiansen M.A. Inverted teaching: applying a new pedagogy to a university organic chemistry class / M.A. Christiansen // J. Chem. Educ. - 2014. - Vol. 91, № 11. - P. 1845-1850.
Вострикова Н.М. К вопросу о современной образовательной среде химической подготовки студентов - будущих инженеров горно-металлургической отрасли / Н.М. Вострикова, Н.П. Безрукова // Химическая технология. - 2016. - Т. 17, № 2. - С. 89-96.
Вострикова Н.М. Использование электронных обучающих курсов при обучении химии студентов горного и металлургического направлений / Н.М. Вострикова. - Новосибирск: Международная научная школа психологии и педагогики, 2015. - № 6 (14). - С. 10-12.
Князева Е.М. Лабораторные работы нового поколения // Фундаментальные исследования. 2012. - Ч. 3, № 6. - С. 587-590.
Вострикова Н.М. Компьютерные тренажёры в организации самостоятельной работы студентов при изучении химических дисциплин / Н.М. Вострикова, Н.П. Безрукова // Химическая технология. - 2009. - Т. 10, № 10. - С. 635-639.
Усова А.В. Методология научных исследований: Курс лекций. - Челябинск: Изд-во ЧГПУ, 2004. - 130 с.
 Possible models of blended learning in training of future bachelors of metallurgical majors | Open and distance education. 2018. № 1(69). DOI: 10.17223/16095944/69/1

Possible models of blended learning in training of future bachelors of metallurgical majors | Open and distance education. 2018. № 1(69). DOI: 10.17223/16095944/69/1

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 854